Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Its not clear from your posts how this debt was incurred ? You moved into the house and they were the existing supplier ? So the debt is for the previous owner ?
    • defence is due on Friday haven't had a response from Morality yet with regards to the CPR request. Have found this from a previous thread would it be ok to use?   1.The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.   2.The Claimant has not complied with paragraph 3 of the PAPDC ( Pre Action Protocol) Failed to serve a letter of claim pre claim pursuant to PAPDC changes of the 1st October 2017.It is respectfully requested that the court take this into consideration pursuant to 7.1 PAPDC.   3.Furthermore, the claimant has given no details as to the breakdown of their claim so the defendant is unable to defend specifically.   4. The claimant openly admits that they do not have access to the agreement nor was the Assignor required to retain a copy. Therefore their claim is unsubstantiated. Pursuant to the civil procedure rules Practice Direction 16 (7.3) Where a claim is based upon a  written agreement:   (1) a copy of the contract or documents constituting the agreement should be attached to or served with the particulars of claim and the original(s)  should be available at  the hearing. With the court’s permission the Claimant is put to strict proof to:- a) show and disclose how the Defendant has entered into an agreement; b) show and disclose how the Claimant has reached the amount claimed ; c) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim;   5. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5 (4) it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.   6. It is therefore denied that the defendant is indebted to the claimant as alleged or at all.
    • He should have an account number after they emailed conformation of the on line agreement.
    • You won't find much, because the vast majority of motorists are just interested in not paying their invoice, those who say they will sue then disappear presumably after changing their minds, and the two successes I can think of (Hitman and Moaning Crusader) won their cases by default. The argument about your case  is simple though - are PE lying about the date they sent the SAR, or not? That's why I scribbled down some ideas in post 66 so they would be ready later on for your Witness Statement.
    • We have had to to temp disable it due to a system glitch you can view all recent activity by clicking the blue " Latest Activity " tab.   Andy
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Advice please with solicitor's letter received re unknown Halifax debt


JD2009
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5510 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My daughter has recently received a letter from HL Legal Solicitors acting on behalf of CapQuest Debt Recovery Ltd, relating to a debt CapQuest allegedly purchased from Halifax PLC for almost £3000, which she has no knowledge of. The letter goes on to say that in April 2008 a Statutory Demand for bankruptcy was sent to her and that no response was ever received. (She has no knowledge of this either). Further, it goes on to say that in July 2007 she agreed to repay the debt at £45 per month and that payments were not maintained. (Again, this cannot be the case as this is the first correspondence she has seen with regard to the alleged debt). They continue by saying that if she fails to contact them a Bankruptcy Petition will be issued.

 

My daughter has no knowledge of this debt, although she did have an account and Credit Card previously with Halifax. Following an acrimonious split from her partner early this year, Halifax wrote to her regarding an outstanding £1,100 balance on her credit card that her ex-partner had run up as an authorised user. (He had suppressed all correspondence and she was naively unaware of this debt also). A full and final settlement at approximately £800 was agreed and paid in respect of the credit card debt. (At the time, she had enough to cope with and I had not discovered CAG, so "helped her out" of what we thought was an isolated problem). Also at that time Halifax were asked whether there were any other amounts outstanding and she was told no.

 

To further complicate matters: Following the split with her partner, the house they privately rented was lost and she and her four year old daughter are presently residing temporarily at our house. The letter she received was redirected by the Royal Mail.

 

My initial thoughts were to write to the solicitors denying any knowledge of the debt or their allegations of earlier correspondence and/or agreements to pay and demand that they return to CapQuest /Halifax to provide legal proof of the debt. However, as I have said above, neither CapQuest nor the solicitors are aware that my daughter is currectly living at our address and I am wary that adverse information could be registered against our address.

 

Any help and guidance would be very much appreciated.

 

Thanks in advance (and apologies for the length of post explaining the background).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

It can be a bit quiet on here at the weekends so don't worry if you don't get an immediate reply. If you need more help than I'm giving, just "bump" your posts.

 

For now, have a look here

 

The Consumer Forums - Debt collectors

 

Letter 18 is the one.

 

DO NOT sign it. only print your name

send by recorded delivery to HL (this is important) Do a track and trace via the royal mail website to confirm it has been delivered and print off the proof of delivery. Keep the post office receipt too.

 

fox

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you challenge and in doing so divulge that your daughter is residing at your address?? Has to be your decision. However, as her parents, your daughter will not be too difficult to find using tracing agents and Halifax are reknowned for using Power2Contact.

 

It sounds as if the ex has been having some fun and games with this one. Was the card cancelled?? Are you sure that it was a full and final settlement and not partial?? (Sorry, hope this isn't insulting!!)

 

In terms of the statutory demand, do you know if the bankruptcy petition went ahead?? Companies shouldn't be making idle threats that they have no intention of carrying out.

 

It all seems rather peculiar and, personally, I would be inclined to send the "prove it" letter. Don't disclose what you have but dig out all correspondence relating to the full and final settlement so that you have it to hand.

 

There isn't much else you can do until you receive a reply and hopefully this all begins to unravel.

 

Whatever happens, there are plenty of experienced and qualified people on this site who will be able to guide you as and when the time arises.

 

Best of luck!!:D

If you feel I've helped then by all means click my star to the left...a simple "thank you" costs nothing! ;)

 

Restons MBNA -v- WelshMam

 

MBNA Cards

 

CitiCard

M&S and More

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks for the quick response silverfox1961.:) Your thoughts are along the same lines as mine, which is very reassuring.

 

I have read the letter template you are suggesting and think it is more than appropriate. My only concern is that any letter would, by necessity, need to give mine and my wife's address as being my daughter's temporary address and I am aware that DCA's etc. are not averse to ignoring what they can and cannot legally register with CRAs. Do you or anyone else have any thoughts on this point? I really cannot see any way around the address issue and do not feel that ignoring the letter entirely is a good idea.

 

Thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

An address is not blackmarked only the person & unless you have some financial association with your daughter, such as a joint bank a/c, you will not be linked to her.

 

Although once they do have an address for her there's no telling what other skeletons will start falling out of the cupboard. It may be wise if she checked her credit file too just to see what might be lurking around the corner.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you challenge and in doing so divulge that your daughter is residing at your address?? Has to be your decision. However, as her parents, your daughter will not be too difficult to find using tracing agents and Halifax are reknowned for using Power2Contact.

 

It sounds as if the ex has been having some fun and games with this one. Was the card cancelled?? Are you sure that it was a full and final settlement and not partial?? (Sorry, hope this isn't insulting!!)

 

In terms of the statutory demand, do you know if the bankruptcy petition went ahead?? Companies shouldn't be making idle threats that they have no intention of carrying out.

 

It all seems rather peculiar and, personally, I would be inclined to send the "prove it" letter. Don't disclose what you have but dig out all correspondence relating to the full and final settlement so that you have it to hand.

 

There isn't much else you can do until you receive a reply and hopefully this all begins to unravel.

 

Whatever happens, there are plenty of experienced and qualified people on this site who will be able to guide you as and when the time arises.

 

Best of luck!!:D

 

Thanks WelshMam2009.:)

 

Yes, my daughter's ex certainly was and still is having "fun and games" in making matters far more difficult than they should be! So much so that if I posted regarding other issues, it would read like War and Peace! It wasn't until he left my daughter and Granddaughter that we discovered various worrying correspondence that he had obviously hidden so well even he had forgotten about it. The problem is trying to piece together the bits and pieces and that, to date, we have not found any other correspondence in regard to this specific issue. All added to his being very difficult and verbally threatening with regard to seeing their daughter! An absolute nightmare! (My daughter has recently sought the services of a solicitor with regard to the non-financial issues, but at this stage the restrictions of legal aid entitlement mean that dealing with the financial matters cannot be taken on by the solicitor, although the solicitor is aware of what looks like a fraud situation).

 

To answer your question regarding whether bankruptcy proceeding were ever issued, we are presuming not as the letter refers to my daughter having this "one last chance" to prevent that happening by contacting them.

 

The correspondence with Halifax regarding previous settlement of her credit card balance is presently being stored by a very good friend along with many of her possessions and we will ask him to dig out the letter, which we are certain did refer to "full and final settlement", however, our worry is that this latest issue may relate to another unknown debt previously sold by Halifax that has been incurred by her ex in her name.

 

 

P.S. Thanks also to cerberusalert for your response. I agree that it would be wise to obtain a credit report for my daughter. Just so much to deal with at present that it's all quite overwhelming for her. Thanks for the advice.

Edited by JD2009
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...