Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Annual Statements for Loan Agreements Query


Dipply75
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5495 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

Am fighting with RBS over an unsecured personal loan taken out in December 2005 and am looking for clarification on one of the 2006 amendments to the CCA 1974.

 

Section 77a states:

 

Statements to be provided in relation to fixed-sum credit agreements

 

After section 77 of the 1974 Act insert—

“77A Statements to be provided in relation to fixed-sum credit agreements

 

(1) The creditor under a regulated agreement for fixed-sum credit—

(a) shall, within the period of one year beginning with the day after the day on which the agreement is made, give the debtor a statement under this section; and

(b) after the giving of that statement, shall give the debtor further statements under this section at intervals of not more than one year.

 

 

So, from when this amendment came into effect there should have been an annual statement provided for the loan, yes?

 

 

Then it states:

 

 

Where this subsection applies in relation to a failure to give a statement under this section to the debtor—

(a) the creditor shall not be entitled to enforce the agreement during the period of non-compliance;

(b) the debtor shall have no liability to pay any sum of interest to the extent calculated by reference to the period of non-compliance or to any part of it; and

© the debtor shall have no liability to pay any default sum which (apart from this paragraph)—

(i) would have become payable during the period of non-compliance; or

(ii) would have become payable after the end of that period in connection with a breach of the agreement which occurs during that period (whether or not the breach continues after the end of that period).

 

 

I read this as a clear statement that the debtor has no liability to pay an interest calculated for the period no statements are provided (period of non compliance). Not, no liability until the statements are provided or only liable after compliance etc...in other words, the cannot charge interest for the period of non compliance, full stop. Not that they can deduct it then just add it back on after sending the missing statements.....

 

Can anyone offer an opinion on this? Am I able then to tell RBS to cancel/refund any interest charged during the period of non compliance, as this will be my next step :)

 

 

And is there anyone out there that does receive an annual statement for their loan?

 

 

Any advice appreciated!

Dipply75

 

I am in no way a legal advisor and only speak from my own experiences and the helpful advice of those in the same boat! :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have to say I'm a little confused.

 

Why do you feel that the amendment of the CCA in 2006 applies to a loan taken out in 2005?

 

Annual statements become compulsory for fixed sum credit agreements from 1st October 2008. Prior to this date the requirement was to provide a copy of the credit agreement within seven days of signing the original. In practice you would normally receive a copy at the time of signing. Without the copy the creditor can only enforce a default with a court order.

 

In this case it seems very much like the original obligations of the loan agreement will stand, including any penalties including interest, hope this helps!

Edited by rickyd
extra information discovered after posting
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Rickyd, thankyou so much for replying, that is very helpful!

 

Firstly I had read about so much of the act being retrospective so could apply it to an existing loan but I had no idea the 2006 act did not come into force until the end of 2008.

 

I know there are others with different loan providers that have been receiving annual statements for about 2 years now, I guess thats why I assumed I should be getting one also. I am shocked at the 2 year gap between the act being passed and coming into effect....call me cynical but not surprising that they pass an act 2 years ago supposed to help us yet the help only started 6 months ago!

 

Thanks for the help, much appreciated :)

Dipply75

 

I am in no way a legal advisor and only speak from my own experiences and the helpful advice of those in the same boat! :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

My best guess is that with fixed rate loans, the reason that statements are less important is because there are no changes along the way from the terms set out in the loan agreement. The only change from the original details is when an early settlement figure is requested and this would bring a freshly created statement specifically tailored to the date and outstanding amount. Although you could say the same for fixed rate mortgages they are covered by altogether different legislation that requires an annual statement be issued even for interest only loans where absolutely nothing changes until the end, as a home is at risk if payments are missed. Glad you found my reply useful:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...