Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for the reply do you think it’s just a threat for the 14 days or they will send court letters 
    • That’s great, thank you so much. We will contact Doves and the finance company again and hope they will resolve it. Out of interest, where would we stand if we did pay the costs? Would we then be able to claim that back or should we just wait for a response from them before we take the car back from Mercedes?     
    • As I'm off on holiday on Wednesday and won't be around I'll bring things forward and be pessimistic and decide that Iceland won't cooperate.  There are two things to ponder. The private parking companies have a lot in common for obvious reasons.  But also some differences. Excel and its sister company VCS are by far the most litigious.  They take large numbers of motorists who don't pay them to court - perhaps the majority.  That's not because they have a good case.  Indeed their case is rubbish.  It's because, sadly, enough people are terrified of the idea of going to court and just pay up when the court papers arrive.  It's a numbers game to Excel/VCS. In cases where the motorist is in it for the long haul, Caggers win 85% of the time in court against Excel/VCS (yes, I did once go back and counted all the court cases over the previous 30 months).  But Excel/VCS take the odd defeat because of the mugs who just panic and pay.  So take this into account when deciding what to do. Secondly, without boring you with the reasons, I know about the world of local journalism.  Papers have great difficulty in filling their column inches.  If you do contact the local media there is a 100% chance that they will publish something and embarrass Iceland - and maybe get them to back down. Again, have a think if this is a road you want to to go down. If you don't win by Wednesday!  
    • Followed up with letter which is no surprise as I’m easy to find via electoral roll. Letter says we have been asked to recover from you on behalf f our client in Middle East x amount. if you believe you are not liable please contact us - yeah right! If you wish to make payment here are our client bank details which look genuine and relate directly to a Dubai bank. ” if you don’t engage our client may take further action” etc blah blah blah. its the same type phrases used by CWD/IDRWW/IDR etc…..   I ignored the email, blocked the text number and will wait to see if I receive any formal action via Mail but seems like the same tactic I’ve seen for 10 years plus and I’ve ignored all. just for people’s info
    • Hi. I expect the experts will be along later to advise you. In the meantime, I've amended your thread title to show the car park name and location. HB
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Parking Next to Double yellows in an old entrance


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5533 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have recieved a PCN for "Parking in a restricted street during prescribed hours". I was parked off the road in a blocked off entrance to private property. As I wasn't parked on the road, I assumed that it was legal for me to park there. Does the PCN apply?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Without pictures it is hard to tell.

 

Lines apply to the whole road from the centre of the carriageway to the boundary of the highway (that includes verge, pavement, etc.).

 

However, if you were on private property, it may be that the PCN is wrongly issued.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi patdavies,

 

I was parked parallel to the yellow lines (and road) in the area that would have been the pavement, if the pavement had continued across the old entrance. No wheel or part of the car was over any part of the yellow lines or the road.

 

You said the lines apply "to the boundary of the highway (that includes verge, pavement, etc.)". Does that include private land that used to be an entrance onto private land, that is between sections of pavement? I have permission from the owners of the land to park there.

 

I don't want to contest this if I am in the wrong. However I am frustrated as I was not aware that I was parking illegally and cars are parked there every day (including today!).

 

Thanks for your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You said the lines apply "to the boundary of the highway (that includes verge, pavement, etc.)". Does that include private land that used to be an entrance onto private land, that is between sections of pavement? I have permission from the owners of the land to park there.

 

I don't want to contest this if I am in the wrong. However I am frustrated as I was not aware that I was parking illegally and cars are parked there every day (including today!).

 

Thanks for your help.

 

If it is private land then the PCN is unenforceable (Contravention did do not occur). I suspect that it is the latter.

 

If, however, it is public land that you drive across the access the private land from the road (a illustration would be the lowered part of the pavement that you drive across to reach your driveway) then the road is a part of the public highway and the ticket is valid.

 

The only way to tell is to ask the highway authority for details of the boundaries of the public highway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm slightly confused as to how you were parked but will add this incase it helps.

 

As has been said above, the highway normally extends to the rear of the footway. Any traffic orders on the highway will also cover the footway.

 

So, if you have a straight road with double yellows and you pull up onto the pavement or verge to park, then you can get issued with a parking ticket (and/or obstruction if it was a Police Officer.)

 

EDIT: Where there is no pavement, such as across a junction, then the limits of the highway are generally a straight line from back of footway one side to back of footway the other side.

If you feel I've helped then by all means click my star to the left...a simple "thank you" costs nothing! ;)

 

Restons MBNA -v- WelshMam

 

MBNA Cards

 

CitiCard

M&S and More

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it is private land then the PCN is unenforceable (Contravention did do not occur). I suspect that it is the latter. ...

 

The only way to tell is to ask the highway authority for details of the boundaries of the public highway.

 

If I challenge the PCN do I need to include evidence that I was not on the public highway?

 

How do I contact the highway authority for these details?

 

Thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

If I challenge the PCN do I need to include evidence that I was not on the public highway?

 

How do I contact the highway authority for these details?

 

Thanks again

 

Records are publically viewable during normal office hours, check if you have to make an appointment for someone to assist. You may have to pay circa £20 plus for a copy of a record due to Ordnance Survey Copyright.

If you feel I've helped then by all means click my star to the left...a simple "thank you" costs nothing! ;)

 

Restons MBNA -v- WelshMam

 

MBNA Cards

 

CitiCard

M&S and More

Link to post
Share on other sites

... EDIT: Where there is no pavement, such as across a junction, then the limits of the highway are generally a straight line from back of footway one side to back of footway the other side.

 

That would put me on the highway! However the owners of the business assure me that that section is owned to them, as it was previously an entrance to their land, and they pay business rates for that section of land.

 

So I suppose I need to confirm who owns it. Any ideas?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Records are publically viewable during normal office hours, check if you have to make an appointment for someone to assist. You may have to pay circa £20 plus for a copy of a record due to Ordnance Survey Copyright.

 

Forgive my ignorance but where are they viewable? The PCN says our County Council is the enforcement authority, are they the highway agency? do I contact their offices?

Link to post
Share on other sites

That would put me on the highway! However the owners of the business assure me that that section is owned to them, as it was previously an entrance to their land, and they pay business rates for that section of land.

 

So I suppose I need to confirm who owns it. Any ideas?

 

Their deeds may well show ownership extending to the road but it doesn't mean that the area does not form part of the adopted highway, unless it has been formally "stopped up."

 

Aside from land purchased for new roads etc, Highway Authorities do not "own" the subsoil. Nonetheless, roads/pavements forming part of the adopted highway are maintainable at public expense and a right of passage over them exists.

 

I honestly don't know much about business rates other than to say where I live, it used to be calculated based on rateable value.

If you feel I've helped then by all means click my star to the left...a simple "thank you" costs nothing! ;)

 

Restons MBNA -v- WelshMam

 

MBNA Cards

 

CitiCard

M&S and More

Link to post
Share on other sites

Their deeds may well show ownership extending to the road but it doesn't mean that the area does not form part of the adopted highway, unless it has been formally "stopped up."

 

Aside from land purchased for new roads etc, Highway Authorities do not "own" the subsoil. Nonetheless, roads/pavements forming part of the adopted highway are maintainable at public expense and a right of passage over them exists.

 

Thanks again for your help WelshMam2009,

 

So are you saying that even if that section was owned by the business it could still be part of the highway, and therefore I will have to pay the PCN (or more if I challenge it)?

 

 

Not sure what "stopped up" means or how I find out if that section is or not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Forgive my ignorance but where are they viewable? The PCN says our County Council is the enforcement authority, are they the highway agency? do I contact their offices?

 

Yes, they should have the records but just ring up first to check.

If you feel I've helped then by all means click my star to the left...a simple "thank you" costs nothing! ;)

 

Restons MBNA -v- WelshMam

 

MBNA Cards

 

CitiCard

M&S and More

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again for your help WelshMam2009,

 

So are you saying that even if that section was owned by the business it could still be part of the highway, and therefore I will have to pay the PCN (or more if I challenge it)?

 

Yes...sorry!! :(

 

 

Not sure what "stopped up" means or how I find out if that section is or not.

 

Stopping up is a legal process where control of the land reverts back to the land owner, is no longer maintainable at public expense and no right of passage exists.

 

This can happen for a number of reasons such as new roads rendering old ones obsolete or perhaps large building re-developments.

 

I doubt very much that this has happened in your case. However, when you view the records, the area will not be coloured up as adopted highway if it has been stopped up.

If you feel I've helped then by all means click my star to the left...a simple "thank you" costs nothing! ;)

 

Restons MBNA -v- WelshMam

 

MBNA Cards

 

CitiCard

M&S and More

Link to post
Share on other sites

I doubt very much they own the access across the footway as this would prevent people legally walking down the street.

 

No it wouldn't if it were adopted highway.

 

As I said earlier, Highway Authorities rarely own subsoil and any land search will verify this.

If you feel I've helped then by all means click my star to the left...a simple "thank you" costs nothing! ;)

 

Restons MBNA -v- WelshMam

 

MBNA Cards

 

CitiCard

M&S and More

Link to post
Share on other sites

Glasgow does issue many tickets in these situations, with motorsts feeling providing they are 'behind' the line, they are somehow exempt from the restriction. Thr Appleals service has refused to back them up, supporting the Council's contention that any former access wide enough to permit a car to park even though not in use (or a permanently closede gate) is still deemed to be part of the road and the 'controlled element' of the restrictions for this street.

 

You could certainly take it to appeal - as it won't cost you any more - but don't be surprised if it is rejected.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The mistake drivers make is the confusion between road and carriageway the restriction for a yellow line covers the road not the carriageway and the road includes the footway and and crossing points over the footway.

 

I agree.

 

However, this

However the owners of the business assure me that that section is owned to them, as it was previously an entrance to their land, and they pay business rates for that section of land.

at least as far as the paying of rates is concerned, may make the land not part of the highway.

 

OP can only resolve this by contacting the highway authority (not the Highways Agency!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I very much doubt they'll be paying rates on their access road - it would be handy if there were pictures to allow a visual check of the sightlines involved, but even then this is no guarantee, especially if the car was 'adjacent' to the roadway in question.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...