Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • hehe know it very very well you are in scotland  you totally ignore  a private parking speculative invoice is NOT A FINE. in scotland they are a scam dx  
    • it does NOT SAY WILL... read it again... instructed does NOT MEAN WILL..it has no legal meaning... and the 'they' is not the legal debt owner.... stuff and all any 3rd party DCA can do, let alone any dca in the 1st place..no legal powers whatsoever..none of 'em. all the debt owner can do is the same as you or i if someone owes us money...start a court claim. dx  
    • I found it cheers Dave!!   I think focusing on lack of compliance with legislation should be the one, seeing as we just lost the case to them by not complying, it will be worth pointing it out. I also want to poi t out their m.o. Which is less than honourable to say the least. Hopefully the judge will side with the little old lady and not the peoppe who use deceit to line their pockets!!   She said she is happy to speak up but is kindly asking for assistance in the form of a bullet pointed printed paper for her to take in so she can read out her points and leave it at that (without rambling).    Straight and to the point!!    Daves post #66 is legendary 🙌    Thanks for the help guys 😊    Let's kick some ass    
    • I differ from my site team colleague slightly in the the six-month rule applies if you have asserted your rights within the six months. My understanding is that you haven't asserted your rights during that time. In other words you haven't informed them that you are giving them a single opportunity to repair and if they decline or if the repair fails then you are rejecting the car for a refund. Please correct me if I'm wrong. On that basis, you are covered by the consumer rights act but not in terms of the right to reject. You are covered under the consumer rights act in that you are entitled to purchase a vehicle which is of satisfactory quality and remains that way for a reasonable period of time. You don't have to prove that the fault existed at the time of sale – although that's what they will try to tell you and even the motoring ombudsman will try to tell you that. But the motoring ombudsman is an industry led organisation which pretends to be an ombudsman but in fact favours the industry and its advice is wrong and even deceptive. I think you should start off by writing both to the finance company and also to the dealership. Describe the fault to them. Send them the evidence you have that the windscreen was incorrectly fitted and the damage which has been caused as a result. Send in the quotation for the work and require them to respond within seven days and that they must agree that the work will be carried out by a competent professional an authorised repairer. Not one of their cheapskate once. Also, you will want them to agree to provide you with a courtesy car. Also have you incurred any expenses associated with this? Travel, car hire, cost of inspections –?? Have you told us the name of the finance company? My site team colleague is correct that if they cause any trouble then you should see them as co-defendants. You can be certain that they will put their hands up. It will go to court. You would sue them for the cost of the work. You would recover your costs of the installation plus your court costs. I don't think you will be able to sue for the rejection of the vehicle on the basis of what you tell us in terms of having not asserted your rights. However you will be able to recover the cost of all the works – making good everything so that the car is in the condition that it would have been in had the replacement windscreen been properly fitted. I wonder who fitted the replacement windscreen? I think I would be out to sue them as well. Post the draft of your letter to the dealership and also to the finance company here so that we can have a look before you send it off. Incidentally to answer your question about what should you do immediately,  I would suggest that you send the letter tomorrow. Wait until the end of the week. If they don't respond or if they respond negatively, then write to them immediately and tell them that you are not prepared to do without the vehicle. As they have failed to respond to your putting work in hand and you will be approaching them for the costs of all the repairs and if they cause you any difficulty in you will simply sue them. A bill of about £4000 is easy. It puts you within the small claims track so there is no risk of costs even if you lose – which is most unlikely on the basis of what you say
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Parking Next to Double yellows in an old entrance


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5534 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have recieved a PCN for "Parking in a restricted street during prescribed hours". I was parked off the road in a blocked off entrance to private property. As I wasn't parked on the road, I assumed that it was legal for me to park there. Does the PCN apply?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Without pictures it is hard to tell.

 

Lines apply to the whole road from the centre of the carriageway to the boundary of the highway (that includes verge, pavement, etc.).

 

However, if you were on private property, it may be that the PCN is wrongly issued.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi patdavies,

 

I was parked parallel to the yellow lines (and road) in the area that would have been the pavement, if the pavement had continued across the old entrance. No wheel or part of the car was over any part of the yellow lines or the road.

 

You said the lines apply "to the boundary of the highway (that includes verge, pavement, etc.)". Does that include private land that used to be an entrance onto private land, that is between sections of pavement? I have permission from the owners of the land to park there.

 

I don't want to contest this if I am in the wrong. However I am frustrated as I was not aware that I was parking illegally and cars are parked there every day (including today!).

 

Thanks for your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You said the lines apply "to the boundary of the highway (that includes verge, pavement, etc.)". Does that include private land that used to be an entrance onto private land, that is between sections of pavement? I have permission from the owners of the land to park there.

 

I don't want to contest this if I am in the wrong. However I am frustrated as I was not aware that I was parking illegally and cars are parked there every day (including today!).

 

Thanks for your help.

 

If it is private land then the PCN is unenforceable (Contravention did do not occur). I suspect that it is the latter.

 

If, however, it is public land that you drive across the access the private land from the road (a illustration would be the lowered part of the pavement that you drive across to reach your driveway) then the road is a part of the public highway and the ticket is valid.

 

The only way to tell is to ask the highway authority for details of the boundaries of the public highway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm slightly confused as to how you were parked but will add this incase it helps.

 

As has been said above, the highway normally extends to the rear of the footway. Any traffic orders on the highway will also cover the footway.

 

So, if you have a straight road with double yellows and you pull up onto the pavement or verge to park, then you can get issued with a parking ticket (and/or obstruction if it was a Police Officer.)

 

EDIT: Where there is no pavement, such as across a junction, then the limits of the highway are generally a straight line from back of footway one side to back of footway the other side.

If you feel I've helped then by all means click my star to the left...a simple "thank you" costs nothing! ;)

 

Restons MBNA -v- WelshMam

 

MBNA Cards

 

CitiCard

M&S and More

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it is private land then the PCN is unenforceable (Contravention did do not occur). I suspect that it is the latter. ...

 

The only way to tell is to ask the highway authority for details of the boundaries of the public highway.

 

If I challenge the PCN do I need to include evidence that I was not on the public highway?

 

How do I contact the highway authority for these details?

 

Thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

If I challenge the PCN do I need to include evidence that I was not on the public highway?

 

How do I contact the highway authority for these details?

 

Thanks again

 

Records are publically viewable during normal office hours, check if you have to make an appointment for someone to assist. You may have to pay circa £20 plus for a copy of a record due to Ordnance Survey Copyright.

If you feel I've helped then by all means click my star to the left...a simple "thank you" costs nothing! ;)

 

Restons MBNA -v- WelshMam

 

MBNA Cards

 

CitiCard

M&S and More

Link to post
Share on other sites

... EDIT: Where there is no pavement, such as across a junction, then the limits of the highway are generally a straight line from back of footway one side to back of footway the other side.

 

That would put me on the highway! However the owners of the business assure me that that section is owned to them, as it was previously an entrance to their land, and they pay business rates for that section of land.

 

So I suppose I need to confirm who owns it. Any ideas?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Records are publically viewable during normal office hours, check if you have to make an appointment for someone to assist. You may have to pay circa £20 plus for a copy of a record due to Ordnance Survey Copyright.

 

Forgive my ignorance but where are they viewable? The PCN says our County Council is the enforcement authority, are they the highway agency? do I contact their offices?

Link to post
Share on other sites

That would put me on the highway! However the owners of the business assure me that that section is owned to them, as it was previously an entrance to their land, and they pay business rates for that section of land.

 

So I suppose I need to confirm who owns it. Any ideas?

 

Their deeds may well show ownership extending to the road but it doesn't mean that the area does not form part of the adopted highway, unless it has been formally "stopped up."

 

Aside from land purchased for new roads etc, Highway Authorities do not "own" the subsoil. Nonetheless, roads/pavements forming part of the adopted highway are maintainable at public expense and a right of passage over them exists.

 

I honestly don't know much about business rates other than to say where I live, it used to be calculated based on rateable value.

If you feel I've helped then by all means click my star to the left...a simple "thank you" costs nothing! ;)

 

Restons MBNA -v- WelshMam

 

MBNA Cards

 

CitiCard

M&S and More

Link to post
Share on other sites

Their deeds may well show ownership extending to the road but it doesn't mean that the area does not form part of the adopted highway, unless it has been formally "stopped up."

 

Aside from land purchased for new roads etc, Highway Authorities do not "own" the subsoil. Nonetheless, roads/pavements forming part of the adopted highway are maintainable at public expense and a right of passage over them exists.

 

Thanks again for your help WelshMam2009,

 

So are you saying that even if that section was owned by the business it could still be part of the highway, and therefore I will have to pay the PCN (or more if I challenge it)?

 

 

Not sure what "stopped up" means or how I find out if that section is or not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Forgive my ignorance but where are they viewable? The PCN says our County Council is the enforcement authority, are they the highway agency? do I contact their offices?

 

Yes, they should have the records but just ring up first to check.

If you feel I've helped then by all means click my star to the left...a simple "thank you" costs nothing! ;)

 

Restons MBNA -v- WelshMam

 

MBNA Cards

 

CitiCard

M&S and More

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again for your help WelshMam2009,

 

So are you saying that even if that section was owned by the business it could still be part of the highway, and therefore I will have to pay the PCN (or more if I challenge it)?

 

Yes...sorry!! :(

 

 

Not sure what "stopped up" means or how I find out if that section is or not.

 

Stopping up is a legal process where control of the land reverts back to the land owner, is no longer maintainable at public expense and no right of passage exists.

 

This can happen for a number of reasons such as new roads rendering old ones obsolete or perhaps large building re-developments.

 

I doubt very much that this has happened in your case. However, when you view the records, the area will not be coloured up as adopted highway if it has been stopped up.

If you feel I've helped then by all means click my star to the left...a simple "thank you" costs nothing! ;)

 

Restons MBNA -v- WelshMam

 

MBNA Cards

 

CitiCard

M&S and More

Link to post
Share on other sites

I doubt very much they own the access across the footway as this would prevent people legally walking down the street.

 

No it wouldn't if it were adopted highway.

 

As I said earlier, Highway Authorities rarely own subsoil and any land search will verify this.

If you feel I've helped then by all means click my star to the left...a simple "thank you" costs nothing! ;)

 

Restons MBNA -v- WelshMam

 

MBNA Cards

 

CitiCard

M&S and More

Link to post
Share on other sites

Glasgow does issue many tickets in these situations, with motorsts feeling providing they are 'behind' the line, they are somehow exempt from the restriction. Thr Appleals service has refused to back them up, supporting the Council's contention that any former access wide enough to permit a car to park even though not in use (or a permanently closede gate) is still deemed to be part of the road and the 'controlled element' of the restrictions for this street.

 

You could certainly take it to appeal - as it won't cost you any more - but don't be surprised if it is rejected.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The mistake drivers make is the confusion between road and carriageway the restriction for a yellow line covers the road not the carriageway and the road includes the footway and and crossing points over the footway.

 

I agree.

 

However, this

However the owners of the business assure me that that section is owned to them, as it was previously an entrance to their land, and they pay business rates for that section of land.

at least as far as the paying of rates is concerned, may make the land not part of the highway.

 

OP can only resolve this by contacting the highway authority (not the Highways Agency!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I very much doubt they'll be paying rates on their access road - it would be handy if there were pictures to allow a visual check of the sightlines involved, but even then this is no guarantee, especially if the car was 'adjacent' to the roadway in question.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...