Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • old and new threads merged i though you were going to send the SB letter in 2017? dx  
    • dunno you've not scanned up what you've had before how can we tell?  
    • Today , after a lot of years i received a letter from this lot. Very friendly, "Were writing to remind you that we haven't had any contact from you in a while".  The velvet fist, followed by  a veiled threat to get their preferred debt collectors involved. Yep dead right. In 1992/3 I took out a Student load under duress from DHSS. up to 2000 I had successfully gotten deferment on low income. But rather than sign on as unemployed ,I decided to be self employed. I applied and they asked for all sorts of documents. I obliged and then correspondence ceased from them, circa 2001. To date I have had no correspondence from Student Loans. I was made redundant in 2009 and reached 65 in 2012 , at which age the loan should have been cancelled. Now , today, 12 years on retirement and 11 ( at least years after last contact) I get a letter with veiled threats. Do I , as I smell a scam a) ignore it and hope that Erudio will think that this phishing attempt has failed or b) respond with a statute barred letter or c) remind them of legal terms that loan should be cancelled 12 years ago or d) combination of b) +c)      
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Procedure for returning faulty 2 month new phone - carphonewarehouse - o2 contract?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5483 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My 2 month new Nokia 5800 music xpress mobile on contract from carphonewarehouse is continually powering down at apparently random moments. The firmware is uptodate.

 

CWH tell me that the phone would have to be sent away for repair.

 

My questions are this.

 

1. As the phone is only 2 months old, can I request a new phone rather than repair?

 

2. As I pay monthly should they supply me with a phone while it is away for repair? i.e. I pay monthly for the phone, so if it is faulty through no fault of my own shouldn't they supply a phone, otherwise why should I pay for the period it is away being fixed?

 

Thanks for any advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The sale of goods act means that the retailer are responsible for the goods within the first 6 months if they go faulty. The act declares that they are responsible for repairing or replacing the equipment. If they are repairing it then they are conforming to the act and you don't really have too much room to argue. If the phone was a few weeks old you might have more scope to expect a replacement, but not if it's 2 months old.

 

As for suppling you with a temporary phone whilst your phone is being repaired, they have no obligation to do so. In terms of your monthly payments, this is for provision of your network services and i assume that you still have your sim card. Some phone shops do supply a loan phone for the price of a refundable deposit. Failing that, just borrow an old phone off a friend and stick your sim in that as an interim measure.

 

Although annoying to be without your fairly new 5800, the shop are accurately fulfilling their obligations under the sale of goods act and i'm sure it will only be a short time before the equipment and situation is fully rectified.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Update.

 

The phone has been away for repair, and came back "no fault found"

 

GREAT.

 

Two days later, the phone is STILL switching off and will not come back on without a battery removal.

 

When I went to collect it the salesman said to take it back again if the fault re-occurred, and they would send it away again. But what is the point in that, they already had it for 2 weeks and could not replicate or find a fault that happens daily!

 

This is extremely annoying for a new phone. The fault has been around since new, gradually gotten worse, been away for repair, now 4 months down the line it is quite plainly not fit for use.

 

Advise?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have to give then the chance. What probably happened is that the phone was put on the diagnostic tester which evaluated everything from the power cells to the transmitter and receiver modules, and if it passed them all, it generates a 'No Fault' log and it is sent back.

 

If your fault is caused by loose battery contacts or a duff battery, they don't often pick this up, which is why I always try a different battery, and check the battery contacts too. If the fault still persists, I return it with a note advising how to reproduce the fault.

 

The next time it comes back, DON'T leave the shop, but give it a good 20 mintes of use to ensure it has been fixed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You mean chances plural, because they have already had a chance. How many chances do they get under consumer law?

 

I actually think I know what it is. I've googled around and this issue has been posted about by many users, the most commonly accepted fix is to jam a bit of paper in beside the battery to stop it from moving on the contacts.

 

I did that and it worked fine for a day before powering off again, I think that may be the problem - the battery does not fit snug on the contacts. Design/Build flaw.

 

Not sure where that leaves me in the eyes of consumer law though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As many as it takes. The requirement is that both parties have to be 'reasonable'. If the fault is intermittent (as is often the case with electronic items) then further investigations are made if the customer continues to complain of problems. Since it complete the 'first level' diagnostics with nothing untoward, they actually get a good number of handsets mistakenly returned wih nothing wrong, or customers trying to get out f contracts in the blief tat if they keep saying 'it doesn;t work' will somehow magically make the contract disappear.

 

If the problem is as evident as you state, hopefully you can demnstrate it doing what it does in the shop, and they can confirm your experience.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My 2 pence worth

 

It sound to me that a "proper" diagnostic test has been run on the Nokia Fault finding sheets that Nokia engineers are given, and not on the actual phone.

 

It would be nice to check that first level diagnostic just to see what they came up with.

 

Nokia over the years has been reknown to rush out handsets and then between 1-3 months release the softwares patches and updates.

 

Thats just my humble opinion.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was able to replicate the issue, and find the fault myself, so it is off back to Nokia Repairs.

 

It's a known issue with 5800, I read about it on the official Nokia forums, Support surely do not read their own forums.

 

If you hold the phone in your right hand, and lightly tap it into your left hand, it instantly goes off.

 

If you open the back, put your finger on the battery, and just press lightly to any side, it goes off.

 

Problem is loose battery contacts. Either a terrible design, or a manufacture flaw.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Goodness, MOST of my phones do that. You can either re-tension the spring contacts, ot wedge in some tissue paper to ensure it stays in contract.

 

Most of your phones switch off when tapped lightly on the side? And you are happy with that?

 

None of my phones have ever done that before. It's certainly not satisfactory to set about making ad hoc adjustments to any product, never mind sticking flammable paper next to a battery.

 

Anyway, thanks for the feedback, case closed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...