Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

GE Money - CL Finance CLAIM FORM RECVD


bigted28
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5486 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there,

 

I need some help, and have been told this is the place to go!!

 

I have received a claim form from CL finance regarding my Burtons Store Card

 

I am yet to send the CCA request as i am sure all the have is the application form that i signed at the cash desk some 5-6yrs ago

 

I need some advice as to what to do now, i have linked a copy of the claim form to this post.

 

I did have an arrangement with Burton GE Money to pay this off and have been in touch constantly regarding my situation

I was £10 outstanding on my monthly arrangement, now they want everything , and it has been passed to CL finance apparently since Dec 08.

 

Obviously there isnt going to be enough time to get a reply from GE Money in relation to a cca request which is being sent Tuesday.

 

I will send in my AoS extending the time with the intention of defending all of the claim.

I'm sure there are charges on this card which i can also look into.

 

I hope someone has an idea as to what kind of defence I can submit, and the next course of action for me

 

Many thanks

 

BT :cool:

 

http://i638.photobucket.com/albums/uu101/bigted28/BURTONcopy.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi bigted

 

Welcome to CAG.

 

With your AoS send a not to the court and to the claimant pointing out that the claim refers to a written agreement but a copy of the agreement was not attached to the claim form as required by CPR Practice Direction 16 paragraph 7.3. Ask them to send one forthwith.

 

Send a CCA request under s78(1) as well - you shoulkd ask for a coy of the executed agreement and statement of account.

 

When it comes to your defence - you can say that the claim is not sufficiently particularised as

 

1. there is no copy of the agreement and threrfore no evidence that you owe them anything or that they have made the claim against the right person

2. without prejudice to that, there is no statement of account so there is no evidence that the claim amount is correct

 

(assuming they don't send an agreement). We wil help you with the defence - it is a standard "embarassed" defence you need.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Response received stating that they have received my defence, queried this with the court, who state that any correspondence other than AoS is accepted as a defence.

Advised them it is not my full defence, and was meant as AoS only.

Will have to wait and see whaty happens.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...