Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • it's 85k of turnover (well, now £90k). However, you're digging yourself into another hole here. That ship has probably long since sailed. Is it worth pursuing this? You're not going to get anything back from it either way.
    • Hi,   A few pointers from yesterday to take note of evris cpr 27.9 failed again so we should really make issue of this also their WX fail to comply with CPR so again we should take issue with their statement of truth  you cant get tort if you get damages under subsection 7 of CRA because its double recovery  - not sure what we think of this? however its the first time i saw the judges make reference to your non automatic rights from s49 which s54 and 57 assist with. We should start stating this specifically for claims as I think its much better than just 49 and 57 as we need to make it clear where our non automatic rights come from as 54 automatic frankly dont help  I have sent the claim form and defences to the admin email because I can’t upload them for some reason as it wont let me but thought this may help as its the first time we’ve taken tort to trial. although i think the DDJ was honestly struggling to understand some parts of the law because he was asking me about them and how he should interpret them, especially for the automatic. Will apply for transcript if you want it?
    • I decided on confrontation - which I hate.  Omg the arrogance of the driver.  They refused to say who had given them the alleged permission to park on the private land - unless I proved ownership.  I couldn't believe they could be so objectionable.   They advised they couldn't take public transport to work as they lived too far away.  They couldn't rent a local garage as none were available. I simply said that's their issue not mine. It was infuriating that this person had such misplaced entitlement.  However I decided to humour them and show them the title deeds.   They couldn't respond.  Although at this point they alleged some guy in a city up north - whose name they couldn't remember - gave permission!!    They then asked if they could buy the garages and land!! Yet can't afford to park on a meter !! They seemed to back down and agree to now park elsewhere.  I hope so. 
    • I've worked out the contractor invoiced apx 250k - Without adding vat to the invoices.  So based on above he should have added vat to all invoices once he reached 85k?  Obviously he had to pay his labourers - would those payments get taken off what he received?  Or it doesn't matter cos he invoiced for the high sum?
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Are they pulling his leg???


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5549 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My partner has a personal unsecured loan with Halifax. He was paying this back until January 2009 even though he lost his job. He was advised to contact them and negotiate a reduced payment, however, when he did, they refused to listen. He asked them if they wanted him to knock down someone in order to get their money, the woman's response was that 'it was up to him but the payment needed to be paid'. He was more than shocked. They even gave him an overdraft on one of his accounts which he did not request and froze his account until he agreed that the repayment could be deducted from the overdraft! He has tried many times to negogiate without any success. He has now applied to open another bank account. In the meantime, Halifax have charged him £50 default fee and £10 for a phone call they made to him requesting payment. Even though they state that they can charge for everything and anything, is this legal? He is now going to write to them and send token payments every month of £5 even if they refuse.

 

Does anyone have any more suggestions?:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't know much about fees but I thought that these were supposed to be fair and in the region of £12...so £50 default fee seems totally over the top in my opinion!!

 

A few Halifax default notices I've seen have been invalid due to the remedy time...can you scan and post up? (obscure personal details of course!!)

If you feel I've helped then by all means click my star to the left...a simple "thank you" costs nothing! ;)

 

Restons MBNA -v- WelshMam

 

MBNA Cards

 

CitiCard

M&S and More

Link to post
Share on other sites

hya shortwoman

the action you have taken so far is the correct start that is needed to obtain relief of your situation. ie opening a new bank account asap.

 

we wonder what happened from the careing help and support of the halifax. oh well you need to try and pay them if possible the full ammount each month or what you can afford if that is not possible. remember it is essential to write and maintain a clear record of all contact try not to get into phone dialogue with them ask for all communication to be placed in writing.

 

as soon as you have in place a new bank account follow up with an sar for the unsecured loan. and later for all costs/bank charges when your account with them has stabilised.

the road to recovery of your situation is now in your hands the effort you are prepared to put into this will reap its rewards in the near future.

 

for good measure why not post up details of your unsecured loan and let us have a look at it. have you been paying for payment protection insurance if yes why have you not claimed?..what date did you take out this loan?

as you can see there are lots of questions that need to be asked and understood to ensure that the correct advice is given.

 

keep fighting

 

djc

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

this is exactly how i found cag .tried to reason with halifax to pay reduced payments

 

halifax started adding stupid charges to my hubby for phonecalls taking money out of the bank account they claimed they could do what they wanted because he hadnt paid his cc and loan he apparently signed to accept these charges

 

So after getting nowhere and being pushed pillar to post i requested proof that they could do this via a copy of his credit agreement with ts &cs

 

funny enough that was in december still had nothing apart from an unreadble application form and unreadable loan

 

so if you havent done it i would send them a ca request dont sign the letter and make sure you post it signed for .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks all for your response. After looking at his loan papers I found that they were incomplete. He has page one then it goes to page 5 then there are other papers stating the charges. He said he signed for the loan in the bank but only received the papers he had without a copy of anything he had signed for. I want to request a copy of this before we go any further, which Act do I quote as I have forgotten.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya

something like this should do

 

 

 

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Re:− Account/Reference Number

 

This letter is a formal request pursuant to s.77/78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. I require you to provide me with a true copy of the credit agreement relating to the above account, together with any other documentation the Act requires you to provide.

 

I expect you to comply fully and properly with this request, within the statutory time limit. You are reminded that should you fail to comply with my request, the provisions of s.77 will apply.

 

If it is your view that you are not the creditor, s.175 of the CCA 1974 applies in the case of a simple assignment, and places a duty upon you to pass this request to the creditor. In the case of an absolute assignment, you are a creditor as defined by s.189. If you contend that you purchased the rights but not the duties of any agreement, you are reminded that s.189 of the Act is clear that an assignment is of both rights and duties.

 

Your attention is drawn to ss.5(2), 3(b),6 and 7 of the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 (CPUTR).

 

I enclose a cheque in the sum of £1.00, which is the statutory fee. Note that these funds are not to be used for any other purpose.

 

If you are unable to comply fully and properly with this request, you should confirm this in writing at the earliest opportunity, and certainly within the statutory time limit for compliance, and return the fee.

 

We look forward to hearing from you.

 

Yours faithfully

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...