Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Interesting question regarding what Government accounts opposition parties have access to, before an General Election. From what I understand, Government department accounts that are published are always lagging behind and would not include some amounts which are classified as 'commercially sensitive'.  Therefore opposition parties and Parliamentrary select committees would not have access to accounts which contain real time up to date information. If a new Government have found £20 billion of spending liabilities they did not know about, this could be true, as £20 billion is not that much when you look at total Government expenditure. Government department are making decisions on spending all of the time and it could be the previous Government were planning tax changes and/or spending cuts to balance the books.  Jeremy Hunt has recently said that if the Tories had stayed in Government and held an Autumn budget, it would have been very difficult to cut taxes as some had wanted.
    • Everyone knows the tories were hiding the costs - and even added 4 billion quid to the taxpayers high interest credit card to fund a chunk of the NI tax reduction - prime example - look at how much cost was hidden re the Rwanda dogwhistle -10 Billion quid     and re the handful of rebels on the benefit limit If the disasters (like the Rwanda rubbish) of Tory dogs being wagged by the extremist minority ERG tail doesn't highlight the issues .. Enlighten yourself here .. (fat chance) Sir Keir Starmer is right to show Labour rebels the door WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Editorial: Suspending seven MPs following their rebellion over the two-child benefit cap is more than a prime minister flexing his political muscle. It is a...  
    • Trump instigated that didnt he @theoldrouge despite losing the election - and Biden mitigated as much as he could within his boundaries?   "President Donald Trump ordered a rapid withdrawal of all U.S. troops from Afghanistan and Somalia in the wake of his 2020 election loss"   “The order was for an immediate withdrawal, and it would have been catastrophic,” said Rep. Adam Kinzinger, R-Ill., one of two Republican members of the special panel. “And yet President Trump signed the order.”   Trump ordered rapid withdrawal from Afghanistan after election loss WWW.MILITARYTIMES.COM The memo was among the latest revelations from the congressional committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol building.   Although i agree that Biden should have done more to mitigate Trump driven disasters
    • ok your WS is wrong. Paragraph 16 and 17 says  you did not contract with evri but this is not true - see below  Furthermore to the eBay Powered By Packlink T&Cs that Evri is referring to, Clauses 3b and c of the T&Cs states:  (b)   Packlink is a package dispatch search engine that acts as an intermediary between its Users and Transport Agencies. Through the Website, Users can check the prices that different Transport Agencies offer for shipments and contract with the Transport Agency that best suits their needs on-line. (c)  Each User shall then enter into its own contract with the chosen Transport Agency. Packlink does not have any control over, and disclaims all liability that may arise in contracts between a User and a Transport Agency post 251 of occy thread - £844 lost    you should also add a paragraph on donough v Stevenson talking about the fact that even without contract there is still duty of care to goods and by failing to deliver this duty has been breached.   Make those changes and post it back up here and I'll check over things again
    • no we cant add the occy thing because leicster are being difficult people so we're just going to go without it for now
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Appeal to TEC for £604 Old Address Blunder/Baliffs issues


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5594 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Last night had to pay £604 to release car from Baliffs. No paperwork given, apparently related to traffice contravention 14 Oct 2007. We moved house 13 Oct 2007. DVLA were sent our new address and our car reg form updated in the week we moved in. Council car parking cannot help me and say I can only appeal. They cannot send any paperwork. I now have Form PE3 from Northampton TEC which I will complete tonight. Does anyone hold out much hope of our being successful in this appeal? Obviously councils never recheck addresses once a PCN is issued, and this fine just rolled and rolled. Baliffs obviously found us either through DVLA or electoral roll. I cannot be the only person to have slipped through the net as a result of a house move like this - but I need my £604 back. Any views or comments gratefully received.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will move your thread.Can you confirm who the baliffs are ?

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for moving post - sorry I put it in the wrong place. The baliffs were Newlyn plc and the council involved is Waltham Forest. The first we heard of any outstanding debt was when the baliff clamped our car and demanded just over £600 to release it back to us. Payment related to some traffic infringement back in oct 07 when we moved to our new address. When I spoke to the council's parking people they confirmed they had our old address. So we received no letters (we even had a 3 month postal divert on and still received nothing), DVLA were informed when we moved and we had our new licences back by Nov 07 and that's it really. We now have to appeal to Northampton courts who hear all these appeals. We didn't do anything wrong, doesn't the council have a duty of care to find someone, and if they didn't hear back isn't it beyond the bounds of possibility or the wit of man that people have a habit of moving and - oh yes - maybe we'll recheck wtih DVLA? In despair.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You will get your money back...in time !!!

 

You need to complete the PE2 and PE3 and on the PE3 you need to state the following:

 

I was unable to complete this Statutory Declaration in time as I was unaware of the above parking charge notice until a bailiff from Newlyn Ltd clamped my car and I was forced to pay £604 for it's release.

 

Enquiries made with the local authority revealed that this contravention occured on 13th October 2007 and all documentation had apparently been sent to : xxxxxx. I moved from this address the day after this contravention ( 14th October 2007). I updated my details with DVLA and received confirmation in November 2007 of this.

..............................

 

It would be good to send with your application some form of proof of when you moved and DVLA change.

 

You need to telephone the Traffic Enforcement Centre this morning on 08457 045 007 and they will e-mail you the forms. When you call you need to ask them to confirm the address on the Warrant and I would suggest that you ask them for the date of the warrant as the warrant expires after one year.

 

Sadly, the local authority have 19 business days to respond (one month) and because of severe delays at TEC you will not hear the response for a further 3 weeks. You are therefore looking at 2 months !!.

 

However, the local authority can ACCEPT this application in one day if you pressure them.

 

If this application is rejected PLEASE make sure that you post back here and APPEAL.

 

Our firm have assisted with hundreds of Out of Time applications and most are concerning cases such as yours.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...