Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Capital One agreement received. Help please


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5545 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi. Have received my docs today from Capital One which was in respect of my CCA request. Have attached scanned copies. Can anyone have a look for me, to tell me if it is unenforceable.

 

What concerns me is that they say in the letter that, it is the original agreement but they then say that my personal details, signature box, signature and date of signature have been omitted from the copy provided as permitted UNDER REGULATION 3 OF THE CONSUMER CREDIT (Cancellation notices and copy documents) regulations 1983.

 

Can they withold suppling the signature etc details?

 

What’s my next step?

 

Any help appreciated.

 

Gordon

Edited by anxious1234
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd be tempted to send them Scots letter below & see what their response is;

 

Re: my request under the Consumer Credit Act 1974

 

Thank you for your recent letter sent to me, the contents of which are noted. I appreciate your quick response to my original letter. However, the reply received by me does not fulfil your requirements under the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

The Act demands that I be supplied with a true copy of any properly executed credit agreement that exists in relation to the above account. I may ask for this on demand providing that a fee of £1.00 is paid. This fee was sent with my original letter.

 

My request remains outstanding. The items you sent in your reply, does not constitute a true copy of any credit agreement that may or may not have been signed by me on the opening of this account. It neither confirms that I am liable for any alleged debt to you, nor gives me any chance to evaluate whether any original agreement was ‘properly executed’.

 

I still require you to send me a true copy of the original credit agreement that you allege exists. As you will know, under the Consumer Credit Act 1974, a judge is not permitted to make any enforcement order unless the creditor can provide a true signed copy of the original credit agreement. This means that unless you can produce such an agreement, this alleged debt is not enforceable in law.

 

You had until XX/XX/2008 to provide me with the true copy I requested. You are now in default of my request. Any account I hold with you is now in legal dispute. Whilst the account remains in dispute, you are not permitted to ask for any payment, nor am I obliged to offer any payment to you. Furthermore, whilst the dispute remains, you are not entitled to charge any interest on the account, nor make any further charges to the account. Additionally, you are not entitled to register any information on this account with any credit reference agency.

 

To register information with a credit reference agency, you must have written consent from the customer to collate and share such information. This consent is given in the form of a signed credit agreement, so until you produce such an agreement, you may not do this.

 

The requirement for consent to share data is a clear requirement of the Data Protection Act 1998. any such attempts to share my data without my consent will be met with a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office

 

To sum up, I will not be making any further payments to you until you provide me with the document I have requested. Whilst you remain in default of my request, you are not permitted to take any action against this account. This includes adding further charges and passing any information to the credit reference agencies.

 

Should you not have any signed credit agreement in relation to this alleged debt, please confirm this in writing to me.

 

 

I look forward to your reply.

 

Yours faithfully

Print name do not sign

 

**amend to suit your circumstances.**

Link to post
Share on other sites

The regulations state:

(2) There may be omitted from any such copy-

(a) any information included in an executed agreement, security instrument or other document relating to the debtor, hirer or surety or included for the use of the creditor or owner only which is not required to be included therein by the Act or any Regulations thereunder as to the form and content of the document of which it is a copy;

(b) any signature box, signature or date of signature (other than, in the case of a copy of a cancelable executed agreement delivered to the debtor under section 63(1) of the Act, the date of signature by the debtor of an agreement to which section 68(b) of the Act applies

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, they are legally entilted to omit them then. In which case, surely they can not be forced into suppling them now. Therefore, how will I know what and if they have an enforceable agreement.

 

Gordon

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi. Forgive me from sounding stupid, if I do. But all over the forum we are told to send CCA requests to get sight of the original agreements, so that we can check if enforceable or not.

But from the look of it now, this is a waste of time when they do not have to supply these.

 

So what are we expected to do? Just write to the card company as suggested in http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk...uldnt-use.html stating that it is not a request under section 78 of the CCA1974. If this is the case can we not get this clear in the Forum to save people alot of wasted time ?

 

Gordon

 

PS Have you checked the agreement copies they have sent me to see if they look enforceable or not?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The reason that http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/173201-why-you-shouldnt-use.html is not used willy nilly is because it is part of pre-action protocol, so anyone using it must be willing to go the full mile if need be.

 

The majority of creditors don't hide behind section 78 of the CCA1974 and will actually provide what they have. Whereas Crap1 are devious little pricks and will try every trick in the book to attempt to hoodwink people into believing that they have an enforceable agreement, which leads me to your question. As it stands, yes the agreement above would be enforceable if it were yours.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok. Thanks. So I send the 2nd letter and see what happens.

 

If no actual original agreement supplied then I will wait and see if they issue proceedings, if they do then request the original as suggested.

 

 

Gordon

Link to post
Share on other sites

Crap1 are notorious for failing to provide enforceable agreements, chances are their in-house monkeys Debitas will eventually pass it onto an outside DCA who can easily be dispatched because until they do provide an enforceable agreement they are stuffed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anxious, you have left all your personal details in the attachments. Suggest you delete the attachments, delete your personal details, and re-attach them :eek:

 

I also got the same thing today btw, in respect of one of my accounts so will use the CPR3.16 (?) letter as a pre-action (getting ready to go to court) and demand the agreement:mad:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/capital-one/177738-aa99-capital-one-acc.html#post2064878

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/capital-one/164583-aa99-capital-one.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Send them this letter recorded delivery (print your name,don't sign it)............

 

 

Dear Sirs

 

Account number

 

I write with regards to the above account with your organisation.

 

I respectfully request that you provide me by return a copy of the credit agreement which bears my signature. I require this as i have reason to believe that there may be discrepancies within the agreement which may leave it improperly executed.

 

Obviously if the agreement is improperly executed I would be entitled to ask the court to consider the agreement and make a declaration of the rights of parties to the agreement.

 

I must stress this request is NOT made pursuant to section 78 Consumer Credit Act 1974 but is made pursuant to the Civil Procedure Rules ( Pre action protocols and Part 31.16) and therefore unsigned copy will not suffice, only a copy of the original contract in its unaltered form will suffice in these circumstances

 

Please confirm if you still hold a copy of my signed agreement and that you will provide me with this document.

 

I do not view this as an unreasonable request given that by supplying the document which I have asked for it will allow me to assess if my case has merit and will help to resolve matters possibly without the need to involve the court and will undoubtedly save costs on both sides

 

I look forward to your reply and would ask for a response by 4pm on XXXX Date ( Give 21 days to respond)

 

Yours,

Print name do not sign

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...