Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Last June, 3.4m members received a £100 payment from the building society. Now they will be wondering whether the offer will be replicated this year.View the full article
    • Write to the IPC complaining that UKPC have not observed the requirements of PoFA . IPC  Waterside House, Macclesfield SK10 9NR Dear IPC, I am writing to complain about a serious breach of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 by UKPCM. I feel that as it is more a breach of the Act rather than not just  complying with your Code of Practice which is why I am bypassing your operator. Should you decide to insist that I first complain to your operator, I will instead pass over my complaint to the ICO and the DVLA . My story starts with being issued a windscreen PCN on 8/3/24 which was almost immediately removed and a second  PCN was then  sent by post on 13/3/24  [deemed delivered 15/3/24] which I did not receive and had to send an sar to have that particular mess revealed later  but that is not the reason for my complaint. UKPC then sent a Keeper Liability Notice dated 12/4/24 warning me that as 28 days have now elapsed, I as keeper am now liable for the charge.  This is in direct contravention of PoFA since the keeper does not become liable to pay until the day after the original PCN is deemed to have been given which would have been 13/4/24 -a Saturday ]. Not only does it not comply with PoFA but it fails to adhere to your Code of Practice and is in breach of their agreement with the DVLA. You will be aware that this is not the first time that UKPC have fallen foul of the DVLA and presumably yourselves. I have included copies of both Notices for information. You will realise the seriousness of this situation if this is standard practice from the UKPC to all motorists or just those where windscreen tickets are involved since the Law regarding PoFA is being abused and is unfair to misguide motorists. I await your  response which I understand will usually be within a week. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I would think that should be sufficient for the IPC to cancel your PCN though  you should await comments from the Site team before sending your complaint. Don't forget to include both PCNs.  
    • Hi DX, Sorry, fell asleep as I was up all night last night writing that statement. Yes, I attached the rest of the witness statement on post 50, bottom of webpage 2. That's the important part.  It looks like the lawyer who wrote Erudio's Witness statement does not work for them any more. So, I'll have another lawyer representing instead. Not sure if I can use Andy's hearsay argument verbally if that happens.... I did not put it in writing. Apart from not sending deferral forms, my main argument is that in 2014 Erudio fixed some arrears mistake that SLC made and then in 2018 they did the same mistake, sent me confusing letters. What is the legal defence when they send you confusing material?
    • Chinese firm MineOne Partners has been ordered to sell land it owns near a US nuclear missile site.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Tai24903 V Abbey


tai24903
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6317 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys

I'm after help. I've read threads on this section for what seems like hours on end and I'm a little confused.

I only have a years worth of statements, for which I have approx £700 in charges.

On 14 June I sent my Data Protection Subject Access request to Abbey and on 23 June got what appears to be their standard reply regarding details held on microfiche etc, along with 12 months worth of statements (that I already have)

On 17 July I sent my 2nd letter to Abbey, found in the section 'The Microfiche argument', re: Data protection Act disclosure request.

On 24 July received reply from Abbey saying basically that they've given me all the transaction data I am entitled to, and that the information stored on microfiche isn't covered by Data Protection Act. Enclosed was a leaflet referring me to the Financial Ombudsman if I'm not happy.

 

I've noticed from recent postings on the site, that there is a suggestion to start a Small claim for the information requested and the estimated amount I want to claim (all in one claim).

Any suggestions, I'm finding it quite daunting seeing how long some of these cases are taking.

Thanks:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, thanks for the response.

It was The Draft Approach in Seminoles thread sticky that I was referring to.

I think I'lll sit tight for a few days to see if any further discussion takes place regarding that route.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Bizarre, this morning I have received a statement in the post from Abbey with

£420.00 of refunded charges, without any explanation. Doesn't relate to what I'm claiming from them, has anyone else experienced this just before they are about to issue a claim.

I still haven't completed my Moneyclaim form - I'm a week overdue. What is my next step? Do I contact Abbey or ignore it and continue with my N1 form anyway?

To me, I see this as an admission of guilt.

I'll be really pleased for anyones advise.

Thanks:confused:

 

ABBEY - Subject Access Request Sent 14/6/06

Request for Repayment of charges sent 20/8/06 (for the statements I have)

Letter Before Action sent 4/9/06 (inc. estimated charges £2614.40)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

After receiving another £55.00 worth of charges refunded on this months bank statement, with no word from Abbey, I have finally filed my claim against them with Horsham County Court. (Minus the £425.00 they have already put back into my account.)

Guess I'll wait to see what happens next. Still feeling a bit nervous that something will go wrong or be wrong at this late stage.

Thanks for everyones help in getting me this far, I'll definately be donating if (when) the money finally comes through!

ABBEY - Subject Access Request Sent 14/6/06

Request for Repayment of charges sent 20/8/06 (for the statements I have)

Letter Before Action sent 4/9/06 (inc. estimated charges £2614.40)

Claim Filed Horsham County Court 18/10/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

Received a letter in the post this morning from the Court to say Abbey have filed an Acknowledgement of Service, indicating an intention to defend all of the claim.

 

I'd be really grateful if someone would let me know what to expect next or to hear from anyone whos at a similar stage.

Thanks x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have received a copy of Abbey's Defence in the post this morning:

 

1. Save as is specifically admitted in this Defence, the Defendant denies each and every allegation set out in the Particulars of Claim.

2. It is admited that the Claimant has a current bank account with the Defendant, Account No...........

3. At all time the Account has been subject to the applicable terms and conditions wich form part of the contract between the Claimant and the Defendant and to which the Claimant agreed when he opened the Account. the Defendant will refer at trial to full conditions, but for the purposes of this Defence will refer to the following extracts.

a) You can apply for an overdraft on your Account. If we give you an overdraft we will tell you your limit and the interest rate applicable.

b) An authorised overdraft occurs if without our agreement you overdraw your Account or exceed the limit of an overdraft.

c) If you have an anauthorised overdraft, you will be charged fees as set out in our Tariff of Charges or specified to you and these may include fees for transactions we are unable to process due to lack of available funds in your Account.

4. Throughout the period that he has had the Account, the Claimant received a number of copies of the Conditions and of the said Tariff of Charges as they were amended and updated (though there has been no material amendment to the Conditions extracted in paragrapghs 3 (a, b and c above)

5. Any overdraft facilityu on the Account was (and is) subject to the conditions.

6. The Claimant has overdrawn or exceeded authorised overdraft limits on the Account on a number of seperate occasions, full details of which will be provided on disclosure. Therefore by virtue of the Conditions referred to in paragraph 3 above such overdrawing was unauthorised and in breach of contract and the Claimant became liable to pay fees to the Defendant in acoordance with its Tariff of Charges applicable at the relevant time. In accordance with the Conditions, such fees were debited to the Account.

7. In view of the facts and matters referred to in paragraphs 3, 4, 5, and 6 above, the Defendant denies that the amount of £2285.40, or any other amount, was unlawfully debited to the account and the Claimants claim for the repayment of that amount is therefore denied.

8. The Claimants contention that the siad fees are unenforceable and/or are 'penalty charges' is denied. The fees reflect are are proportionate to the Defendants administrative expenses incurred due to the Claimants breach of contract and are a genuine pre-estimate of the damage suffered by the Defendant.

9. Further or in the alternative, even if the said fees are not proportionated fo the Defendant's admistrative expenses incurred (which is denied), The Claimant remains liable to pay such fees as may be found to be proportionate and the Claimant is not entitled to claim repayment of the full amount of each charge made to the Account.

10. No admissions are made as to the amounts claimed by the claimant and the Claimant is put to strict proof of the same.

 

I'm sure i've read similar things in other threads, although I can't find where... but is this normal and the Abbeys standard defence?

How on earth am I supposed to prove all the amounts claimed when they haven't supplied details from my SAR?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Tai,

 

The defence looks exactly like the one in Southerners thread.... "getting my knickers in a twist about going to court". Go take a look and it might help calm your nerves a little!

 

Karen x

Prelim request letter sent 19/10/06

Reply from complaints Dept received 01/11/06

GOGW received 11/11/06 for £210

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I'm filling in my AQ (N149), for section G 'OTHER INFORMATION' In the space below, set out any other information you consider will help the judge to manage or clarify the claim, including any other information you consider should be supplied by the other party

 

I'm not sure if I need to put anything here at the moment. Abbey never did supply my 5 years statements requested in my SAR - do I need to mention this (I've followed the guidance notes from the Library):idea:

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Have today received in the post a General Form of Judgement or Order from the Court.

 

Upon the Courts own motion, the court has made this order of its own initiative without a hearing. If you object to the order, you must make an application to have it set aside, varied or stayed within 7 days of receiving it.

THE COURT DIRECTS of its own initiative as follows:

1) The Claimant shall, by 20 December, file at court and deliver to the Defendant answers to the questions and requests below, concluding with the following statement, dated and signed: 'I believe that the facts stated in this response are true':

i) Provide a typed list of the charges in dispute, showing the date and amount of each charge, and the rate of interest applied;

ii) If only part of the interest is in dispute, show what rate and amount are admitted;

2) UNLESS the Claimant complies with paragraph one of this order, the claim shall stand struck out and the Defendant may file a formal request for Judgment in default and for the assessment of any costs incurred in the proceedings;

3) A party affected by an order made of the court's own initiative may apply to have it set aside, varied or stayed within 7 days of service.

I have already supplied the court with the spreadsheet of charges and interest. Do I just send the same again? Can anyone point me in the direction of any other threads that have experienced the same.

Lastly, is this still normal ? I'm going to browse through the site again to see what I can find but i would appreciate any comments. I'm starting to get very nervous at this late stage, and beginning to wonder if its all worth it.

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Karnevil

I'm confused with the interest bit now, I've just claimed the interest @ 8%

Schedule of charges as follows:

In Respect of:AmountDate IncurredDays since offenceInterest 8% APRESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/07/20002324£20.97ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/08/20002293£20.69ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/09/20002262£20.41ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/10/20002232£20.14ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/11/20002201£19.86UNPAID DD CHARGE£30.0016/12/20002175£14.36ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/01/20012140£19.31ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/02/20012109£19.03ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/03/20012081£18.78ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/04/20012050£18.50ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/05/20012020£18.23ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/06/20011989£17.95ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/07/20011959£17.68ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/08/20011928£17.40OVER OD LIMIT£16.5003/10/20011884£6.84UNPAID DD CHARGE£30.0015/10/20011872£12.36OVER OD LIMIT£16.5011/11/20011845£6.70OVER OD LIMIT£16.5006/12/20011820£6.61UNPAID DD CHARGE£30.0015/12/20011811£11.95ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/01/20021775£16.02ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/02/20021744£15.74ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/03/20021716£15.49ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/04/20021685£15.21ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/05/20021655£14.94ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/06/20021624£14.66ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/07/20021594£14.38ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/08/20021563£14.11ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/09/20021532£13.83ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/10/20021502£13.55ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/11/20021471£13.27ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/12/20021441£13.00ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/01/20031410£12.72ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/02/20031379£12.44ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/03/20031351£12.19ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/04/20031320£11.91ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/05/20031290£11.64ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/06/20031259£11.36ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/07/20031229£11.09ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/08/20031198£10.81ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/09/20031167£10.53ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/10/20031137£10.26ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/11/20031106£9.98ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/12/20031076£9.71ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/01/20041045£9.43ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/02/20041014£9.15ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/03/2004985£8.89CLEARED TRANSACTION£20.0026/04/2004948£4.17CLEARED TRANSACTION£20.0026/04/2004948£4.17UNPAID DD CHARGE£32.0026/04/2004948£6.67ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/05/2004924£8.34ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/06/2004893£8.06ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/07/2004863£7.79ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/08/2004832£7.51ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/09/2004801£7.23UNPAID DD CHARGE£32.0025/10/2004766£5.39UNPAID DD CHARGE£32.0021/01/2005678£4.77CLEARED TRANSACTION£20.0025/01/2005674£2.97CLEARED TRANSACTION£20.0003/02/2005665£2.93UNPAID DD CHARGE£32.0004/02/2005664£4.67CLEARED TRANSACTION£30.0029/03/2005611£4.03CLEARED TRANSACTION£30.0005/04/2005604£3.99UNPAID DD CHARGE£32.0025/04/2005584£4.11£2,285.40£730.89£3,016.29

The claim is an estimated one, they never complied with my data protection request, and only ever sent 12 months of statements to me. I have (I think) 18 statements and have based my calculations/estimations on those 18 statements. ie: 18 months statements with 738.50 of charges, so 738.50 divided by 18 = 41.00.

In my Particulars of Claim, I have put:

Accordingly the claimant claims:-

a. The return of amounts debited in respect of charges in the sum of £2285.40 and any interest charged theron.

b. Court Costs

c. Interest of £703.74 under section 69 County Courts Act as set out on the attached schedule of charges.

 

Hope this makes sense. Thanks so much for your help, trying to concentrate on this with 2 screaming little ones doesn't help!

Link to post
Share on other sites

In Respect of:AmountDate IncurredDays since offenceInterest 8% APRESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/07/20002324£20.97ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/08/20002293£20.69ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/09/20002262£20.41ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/10/20002232£20.14ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/11/20002201£19.86UNPAID DD CHARGE£30.0016/12/20002175£14.36ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/01/20012140£19.31ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/02/20012109£19.03ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/03/20012081£18.78ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/04/20012050£18.50ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/05/20012020£18.23ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/06/20011989£17.95ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/07/20011959£17.68ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/08/20011928£17.40OVER OD LIMIT£16.5003/10/20011884£6.84UNPAID DD CHARGE£30.0015/10/20011872£12.36OVER OD LIMIT£16.5011/11/20011845£6.70OVER OD LIMIT£16.5006/12/20011820£6.61UNPAID DD CHARGE£30.0015/12/20011811£11.95ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/01/20021775£16.02ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/02/20021744£15.74ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/03/20021716£15.49ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/04/20021685£15.21ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/05/20021655£14.94ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/06/20021624£14.66ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/07/20021594£14.38ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/08/20021563£14.11ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/09/20021532£13.83ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/10/20021502£13.55ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/11/20021471£13.27ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/12/20021441£13.00ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/01/20031410£12.72ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/02/20031379£12.44ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/03/20031351£12.19ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/04/20031320£11.91ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/05/20031290£11.64ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/06/20031259£11.36ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/07/20031229£11.09ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/08/20031198£10.81ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/09/20031167£10.53ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/10/20031137£10.26ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/11/20031106£9.98ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/12/20031076£9.71ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/01/20041045£9.43ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/02/20041014£9.15ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/03/2004985£8.89CLEARED TRANSACTION£20.0026/04/2004948£4.17CLEARED TRANSACTION£20.0026/04/2004948£4.17UNPAID DD CHARGE£32.0026/04/2004948£6.67ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/05/2004924£8.34ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/06/2004893£8.06ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/07/2004863£7.79ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/08/2004832£7.51ESTIMATED CHARGE£41.0220/09/2004801£7.23UNPAID DD CHARGE£32.0025/10/2004766£5.39UNPAID DD CHARGE£32.0021/01/2005678£4.77CLEARED TRANSACTION£20.0025/01/2005674£2.97CLEARED TRANSACTION£20.0003/02/2005665£2.93UNPAID DD CHARGE£32.0004/02/2005664£4.67CLEARED TRANSACTION£30.0029/03/2005611£4.03CLEARED TRANSACTION£30.0005/04/2005604£3.99UNPAID DD CHARGE£32.0025/04/2005584£4.11£2,285.40£730.89£3,016.29

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent - thanks guys! I think I'll ask to remove it. Makes my life a little simpler right now.

Also, I'm a bit concerned that my schedule of charges I gave the court is different to the one I sent Abbey in my LBA.

Since sending it to Abbey, they refunded 315.00 of charges which I removed from the most recent charges on the schedule I submitted to court.

Do I need to mention this. I'm thinking that I had 18 statements with 738.50 of charges, 738.50 divided by 18 = 41.02. But on the schedule I sent to the court some of those 738.50 charges were removed to deduct the refund they made into my account, so if the judge looks at it he'll wonder where I got 738.50 from. Does this make sense????:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...

Received Notice of Trial Date in post dated 21 Dec. Court date set for 8 Feb 2007.

The timetable included states that both parties shall serve on each other copies of their evidence. Can someone verify what I need to send other than the 18 months statements I have in my possession. (the rest is based on estimation as they've never supplied requested statements)

The timetable also states that I need to deliver the 'bundle' at least a week before the court date.

Once I've sent Abbey my evidence, should I contact them to try and reach settlement out of court?

Its making me very nervous.....

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Karnevil

Can you just verify for me. In the order the court sent it states:

 

The parties shall serve on each other within 3 weeks of the service of this order copies of their evidence and bring the original evidence to the trial. The parties may not rely on evidence which has not been served in accordance with this order without the court's permission

 

Further down the order:

 

The claimant shall deliver to the court and the defendant at least a week in advance a bundle for use at the trial, clearly marked with the case name and reference and the trail date and containing copies of the parties' statements of case, any orders made by the court (including this one), the parties' evidence and any statements in date order with numbered pages fastened so that they can be turned and read easily.

 

I'm clear on what I include in the court bundle, but first it says I need to send my evidence to Abbey. Am I right in assuming its only the statements I need send to them with a covering letter or shall I just send the whole court bundle to them? and the court now.

 

Sorry if I'm just confusing things and making it difficult when there is so much help and info on the site.

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sure.

 

Upon reading the Ex parte application

 

IT IS ORDERED THAT

 

1. See District Judges order attached.

 

ORDER

Timetable for a small claim

THE COURT DIRECTS/by consent that:

1. The case shall be allocated to the small claims track;

AND THE COURT FURTHER DIRECTS of its own initiative that:

2. The parties prepare for the trial by taking the steps indicated by ticks in the boxes below;

The parties shall serve on each other within 3 weeks of the service of this order copies of their evidence and bring the original evidence to the trial. The parties may not rely on evidence which has not been served in accordance with this order without the court's permission

 

The parties shall try to agree any amounts claimed

 

The parties may not rely on expert evidence without the courts permission

 

The parties may apply for further or other directions after seeking each other's consent, unless impracticable;

 

The claimant shall deliver to the court and the defendant at least a week in advance a bundle for use at the trial, clearly marked with the case name and reference and the trail date and containing copies of the parties' statements of case, any orders made by the court (including this one), the parties' evidence and any statements in date order with numbered pages fastened so that they can be turned and read easily.

 

3. This case shall be tried abefore a district or deputy district judge at this court on the earliest convenient date a least 5 weeks after the service of this order. The time-estimate for the trial (which includes time for the judge to consider the papers breifly beforehand and deliver a short judgement afterwards) is 1 hour. Notice of the date fixed for trial accompanies this order;

 

4. The parties shall inform the court at once if they settle;

 

5. A party affected by an order made of the court's own initiative may apply to have it set aside, varied or stayed within 7 days of service.

 

Trial date has been set for 8 February.

Thanks

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...