Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • wont go near it with a barge pole as its ex gov't debt.  
    • Thanks, I've had my fill of this lot. What makes me so mad is that I had to take out student loan to get any DHSS help. And then when I tried to help myself and family they presented obstacles. Might be worth passing story to RIP off Britain?
    • there is NO exposure if you simple remove your name address/ref numbers etc from docs, over 10'000 pdf uploads are here. which then harvests IP addresses off of the people that then do so..which is why we do not allow hosting sites. read our rules and upload carefully thats exactly why we say capture as JPG, redact, then convert/merge to one mass PDF. then online sites to achieve that we list do not leave watermarks.  every once in a while we have a user like you that thinks they know better...we've been doing it since 2006 with not one security issue. thank you.
    • was at the time you ticked it  but now they've still not complied . if you read up, here , you'll see thats what everyone does,  
    • no they never allow the age related get out, erudio are masters at faking supposed 'arrears' fees which were levied before said date and thus null its write off. 1000's of threads here on them!! scammers untied that lot. i can almost guarantee they'll state it's not SB'd too re above, but just ignore them once sent. dx    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

roxborough about to strike?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5603 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Originally Posted by sexyscorpion1 viewpost.gif

Hello all, I have just read through a thread re roxborough, with interest as I searched roxborough to find an answer to a phone call I received earlier today.

The caller said she was from roxborough and would I confirm some personal details? of course I refused and asked who was calling and what was it about. I couldn't get a sensible answer she just kept going on about data protection and eventually hung up saying I would get a letter.

I kind of put it down to a crank call or something.

Anyway finding this site and reading a thread about debt collecting agencies I am now slightly concerned.

The only thing I think it can relate to is not actually directly my debt/problem.

My mother is 79 years old and has dementia.

last year her kitchen flooded.

after a lot of trouble getting insurance quotes, a builder was eventually found, the work was done and my mothers insurance company paid the money into her account.

About 4 weeks later she received the bill. I helped her write the cheque and posted it myself. It was returned 2 weeks later having bounced.

My mother was confused about the payment process and thought the work had been paid for directly by the bank/insurer. in the meantime she had spent money which should have been for the building work.

Anyway to get to the point I had cause to speak to the contractor about the situation. He was aware mother had dementia and didn't understand what was happening. He agreed to being paid £1,400 immediately and we could sort out the remainder later.

To save another cheque bouncing I got mother to write a cheque to me less some £600 shortfall, paid it into my account and wrote a cheque myself for the builder.

I have told mother on several occassions that £600 is still owing. She doesn't have £600. neither do I.

The builder recently sent me a letter asking me to pay the remainder for the work that I owe him.

My mother hasn't received any such letter that I am aware of. On the one hand I am glad as she wouldn't understand and would just be distressed by the whole thing. but on the other hand I fear I am now liable for the debt.

Can he (the builder/contractor) do this? and am I responsible for the £600 owing?

I am now awaiting the letter I was threatend with earlier today.

Big mess, massive headache!

 

Thankyou in advance for any advise.

SS1

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

How did the cheque bounce in the first place, if the money was in your mums account.

 

So you have paid £1,400. but there is still £600 due on the bill.

Don't think it matters that you paid the £1,400 from your account, it's not your debt, so can't see how you can be asked to pay the remainder.

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey maroonedevo,

the insurance company paid approx £2000 into mums account.

A few weeks passed between the money going into the account and the builder/contractor sending a bill.

My mother is slightly deranged and is in the habit of trundelling to her nearest shop (one stop) on a regular if not daily basis, to stock up on things she doesn't need. she always pays with her bank card!

She was confused about the insurance Co way of doing things and believed (no matter how many times I explained) the insurance co paid the builder direct.

when the bill for the work arrived I told her she had to send a cheque, eventually writing the cheque for her and posting it myself. By the time it reached its recipient she had frittered away some of the insurance money.

I believe other direct debits and bank charges were taken from her account before her pension was paid in which caused a bit of a mess. Hence the cheque bounced. more charges were incurred which ate further into the money.

After speaking with the builder and explaining what was happening, and that she could only pay 1400 The best solution I could come up with to stop her spending any more of the money before the cheque reached the builder and bounced a second time was to get her to write a cheque to me which she did. I paid that immediately into my account. in turn I sent a cheque from my account to the builder.

I am not disputing there is still £600 outstanding. if I had it I would pay it to clear the whole mess up. But it isn't my debt.

My mother has had no contact from either the builder or roxborough as far as I am aware. if she has she will have forgotten within minutes passing and is blissfully unaware of all that is going on. Indeed yesterday I paid a visit with my daughter so as to scout around and see if there were any letters demanding payment, when mention of the new lino in the kitchen was made she believes it is the same lino as some 10 years ago and can't even remember any work being done. Lord help me!

I hope I haven't confused you too much. Thankyou for taking the time to advise.

SS1

Edited by sexyscorpion1
rubbish spelling
Link to post
Share on other sites

What I can't understand is why Roxborough are chasing you for the monies. Just because you paid part of the account with your personal cheque it doesn't mean that you are liable for the alleged debt. The contract is between the builder & your mother, besides who's to say that your mother hadn't already paid him part up front anyway & in her dementia is unaware of it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...