Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I googled "prescribed disability" to see where it is defined for the purposes of S.92. I found HMRC's definition, which included deafness. I don't  think anyone is saying deaf people cant drive, though! digging deeper,  Is it that “prescribed disability” (for the purposes of S.88 and S.92) is defined at: The Motor Vehicles (Driving Licences) Regulations 1999 WWW.LEGISLATION.GOV.UK These Regulations consolidate with amendments the Motor Vehicles (Driving Licences) Regulations 1996...   ….. and sleep apnoea / increased daytime sleepiness is NOT included there directly as a condition but only becomes prescribed under “liability to sudden attacks of disabling giddiness or fainting” (but falling asleep isn't fainting!), so it isn’t defined there as a “prescribed disability”  Yet, under S.92(2)(b) RTA 1988 “ any other disability likely to cause the driving of a vehicle by him in pursuance of a licence to be a source of danger to the public" So (IMHO) sleep apnea / daytime sleepiness MIGHT be a prescribed disability, but only if it causes likelihood of "driving being a source of danger to the public" : which is where meeting / not meeting the medical standard of fitness to drive comes into play?  
    • You can counter a Judges's question on why you didn't respond by pointing out that any company that charges you with stopping at a zebra crossing is likely to be of a criminal mentality and so unlikely to cancel the PCN plus you didn't want to give away any knowledge you had at that time that could allow them to counteract your claim if it went to Court. There are many ways in which you can see off their stupid claim-you will see them in other threads  where our members have been caught by Met at other airports as well as Bristol.  Time and again they take motorists to Court for "NO Stopping" apparently completely forgetting that the have lost doing that because no stopping is prohibitory and cannot form a contract. Yet they keep on issuing PCNs because so many people just pay up . Crazy . You can see what chuckleheads they are when you read their Claim form which is pursuing you as the driver or the keeper. they don't seem to understand that on airport land because of the Bye laws, the keeper is never liable.   
    • The video-sharing app told the BBC that a "very limited" number of accounts had been compromised.View the full article
    • The King is the second monarch to appear on Bank of England notes which will be fed gradually into the system.View the full article
    • The King is the second monarch to appear on Bank of England notes which will be fed gradually into the system.View the full article
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

allied international credit


karens25
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4057 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I think you should write to AIC and tell them that they have failed to comply with their obligations under s77(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 and they may not enforce the debt by virtue of s77(4). Further, because they have failed to rectify this situation within the statutory period of 30 days tey have committed an offence (also under s77(4)), a fact that you will communicate to the FOS, OFT and local trading standards. You will also make it known to the court should civil proceedings be initaited by either side.

 

Tell them that you do not acknowledge any debt to them and that you now consider the matter closed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 210
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

There isn't a template. Try this:

Your address

 

Their address

 

Date

 

Dear Sirs

 

Re: Account number XXXXXX

 

I wrote to you on date requesting a copy of the exedcuted agreement for the above account pursuant to s77(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. You have failed to comply within the statutory period of 12 days.

 

Under s77(4) of the Act you may therefore not enforce the account and, further, since you have not complied within the additional statutory period of 1 calendar month, you have committed an offence under s77(4) of the Act. I intend to make this fact known to the Financial Ombudsman, the Office of Fair Trading and my local Trading Standards office. Should you commence civil proceedings against me, I will also make this known to the court as it constitutes a complete defence.

 

In the absence of an executed agreement, I acknowledge no debt to you.

 

I trust that the matter is now closed.

 

Yours sincerely

 

Gingerbaby

Print your name but do not sign the letter.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi scarlettina and welcome to CAG

 

Firstly, it would be best if youi started your own thread (click on newthread.gif at the bottom of the forum) so your cvase doesn't get confused with the others on this thread.

 

I would start by writing to AIC and point out that you agreed a final settlement of £350 over the phone on date and that they have therefore obvioulsy made a mistake by sending this final notice. They may have recorded the call but it will be difficult to prove it and proabably impossible to get a copy. It will have got 'lost'

 

Separately, send AIC a request for a copy of the exectuted agreement for the account under s77(1)/78(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. Remind them that they have 12 days in which to comply. Do not sign the letter - print your name. Let's see what that brings.

 

Keep on with the claim against NatWest (you may have to wait until the test case is over but don't give it up and youwill get the money back eventually).

 

Finally, in future do not deal with any financial institution over the phone - insist that eveything is in writing only.

  • Haha 1

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi slta

 

Welcome to CAG. Firstly, it would be better to start your own thread so that we can advise you properly. Click on the newthread.gif button on the forum.

 

What did your husband ask for when he wrote to AI? Did he ask for a copy of the executed agreement? I'm sorry, but if AI are chasing the debt, then they have the responsibility by law to send you a copy of the agreement - either because they have a copy or, if not, they must get it from the original lender - Style, in this case.

 

I think you should write back and remind them of their obligations, something like

Dear Sirs

 

RE: ACCOUNT XXXXXXXXX

 

My hsuband wrote to you on date requesting a copy of the executd agreement for the above account under s78(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. You have so far failed to comply. May I remind you that the statutory period for you to reply is 12 days. If you do not comply within that period the account becomes unenforceable until you do comply. If you do not comply within one calendar month folowing the end of the statutory period, you commit a summary offence under the Act.

 

May I also remind you that, the account being unenforceable, you may not request payment, you may not add charges or interest and you may not communicate any data concerning this account to any third party, incluing but not limited to credit reference agencies. It also means that any phone calls demanding payment constitute harassment.

 

I only expect to hear from you again in two circumstances:

 

1) to provide a copy of the executed agreement under s78(1) as requested

2) to inform me that this is the end of the matter and that I will not hear from you again.

 

I also give warning that I will not tolerate harassment but will report any further communications to the relevant authorities, possibly the police.

 

If you do not understand any part of this letter you should consult a qualified solicitor.

See what that does.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi chloe and welcome to CAG

 

PLease start a new thread as I advised slta - everything gets so confused if there are several 'cases' on one thread.

 

I think you need to write to AIC and tell them that your brother doesn't live at that address, that you don't know where he lives, etc - in fact, all the things you told them on the phone -put it in writing. Also tell them that they must not phone again. POint out that contacting people who are not the debtor is contrary to the OFT Guidelilnes on Debt Collection and that, if they phone you again now that you have told them your brother is not at that address, you will report them to the relevant authorities for harassment and may even call in the police. At the end write, "if you do not understand any part of this letter you should contact a qualified solicitor"

 

Finally, note down the date and details of the call. If they phone again, note the call and try and get the name of the person calling. Similarly, should they send any letters- note them. You may have to end up taking them to court and so you need all the evidence.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
  • 1 month later...

Hi h1tm4n32

 

You need to put all this ona formal footing with these clowns. When you can, send them the CCA request and send an SAR too to the original creditor. If there are charges, you can claim them back irrespective of what is happeneing between the banks and OFT as that almost certainly doesn't apply to your case.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Hi Jackey

 

Welcome to CAG.

 

The first thing to do is to find out all about what you owe, etc. Do you have all your statements? If not, send a SAR. It will cost £10 but you will probably find there are quite a few unlawful charges on there that you can reclaim. They have 40 days to comply.

 

You should also send a request for you crediut agreement (see Letter N). that will copst £1 and they have 12 days to comply.

 

They are being very unreasonable in not letter you pay what you can afford - these letters will force them (eventuallty) to supply information that you may be able to use to make them behave more reasonably.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...

Hi JSC

 

Welcome to CAG.

 

Send them this letter

Please note that I am only prepared to communicate with you in writing. Should it be your intention to arrange a "doorstep call", please remember that there is only an implied license under English Common Law for certain people to visit me on my property without express permission; the postman and people asking for directions etc (Armstrong v. Sheppard and Short Ltd [1959] 2 Q.B. 384 per Lord Evershed M.R.).

Please therefore take note that, I revoke license under English Common Law for you, or your representatives to visit me at my property and if you do so without my permission, you will then be liable to damages for a tort of trespass. You would also be conspiring in a trespass if you sent someone to visit me nevertheless.

It would be a good idea to start your own thread - you will get more help that way.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Rashley

 

Welcome to CAG

 

If they send you a statutory demand (SD, ie to start proceedings to make you bankrupt) let us know. We can have some fun with them. There are several firms that are now routinely issuing SDs in completely stupid situations. They can be fought and won quite easily and you get costs automatically.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4057 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...