Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Amber Credit - grrr! and help!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5652 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

First time posting here although this site has been very useful for browsing in the past. Unfortunately I now find myself with a situation which I need help with...

 

2 years ago I took out a car insurance policy with Greenlight Insurance. As I paid by instalments, I signed a credit agreement with Amber Credit.. not fully understanding the setup to be honest, but I didn't question it and merrily paid my instalments each month. In August 2007 I moved house and informed Greenlight, but not Amber as I never even thought about them - my arrangement was with Greenlight or so I thought.

 

In September 2007 I cancelled my insurance policy early as I was selling the car. I agreed the cancellation figure with Greenlight, I think I ended up giving them an extra £60 or something. They sent me my proof of no claims, I paid up and that was the end of it as far as I knew.

 

Today I tried to sign up for broadband and was told my credit check was refused. I checked my credit file and saw unpaid status being logged by Amber Credit since October 2007, for an amount of £33.

 

I eventually find out this is because Amber still had my old address (pre August 2007) and had apparently sent numerous letters there, as well as sending someone round to knock at the door and even checked local establishments such as the pub??!! I asked them if it occurred to them that I had moved house, and did they take the obvious course of action which would be to call Greenlight and validate my address? Well here is where the conversation started to break down, as of course they didn't do this, but have instead had the debt sitting on their books for over a year without trying to find my new address.

 

I do accept that it was my responsibility to contact Amber when I moved, although that wasn't made clear to me by Greenlight when I cancelled, and the whole arrangement structure was a bit of a mystery to me really. However I do take issue with the fact I had told Greenlight of my address, and that Amber could easily have avoided this situation by calling Greenlight to check it.

 

The guy I spoke to at Amber was extremely rude and kept calling my questions about the attempts they had made to find me "irrelevant". He started to accuse me of fraud and deception for refusing to reveal my current address.. but he hadn't even asked me for it!

 

It boils down to this: I have to give them £83 otherwise my credit file remains affected and I can't set up my phone/broadband contract which I need urgently. Should I swallow my pride and pay up? Can I ask Equifax to adjust my credit file if I'm disputing this situation?

 

Thanks in advance,

Angela

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Angela and welcome also from me. Whatever action you take is going to take time, so your urgent broadband connection MAY have to go on the back burner until it is sorted out. The only constructive advice I can give at the moment is - don't speak to them on the phone. Hone up your letter writing skills and write to Amber explaining everything again - address it to the Managing Director and send it recorded delivery. Amber were taken over in March by Close Premium Finance, so send a copy of the letter to them also. Their address is

Close Premium Finance

21st Floor, Tolworth Tower, Ewell Road

Tolworth, Surbiton, Surrey KT6 7EL

 

Much more knowledgeable people will be along to help in due course, but in the meantime, I hope this bit helps.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your advice trilby. I'm thinking of writing to them with a cheque for £33 (the original amount which they say was outstanding) in full and final settlement. If they accept it, am I right in thinking the rest of the debt (£50) would be written off?

 

Perhaps if I send the cheque with a letter setting out the facts and how I would have paid them had they made any effort to check my address, plus how abusive their telephone representative was, then they might figure its less hassle to just accept the cheque and let it go? Or am I being too optimistic!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some do, some don't. I wouldn't send the £33 just yet. Had a small run in with a DCA a couple of months ago where I had written to the original creditor on a couple of occasions asking for their proof that I owed what they alleged. I had no reply to those letters and then, like you, out of the blue comes a letter from a DCA. I gathered together all the relevant documentation, copied it, and sent it to the DCA together with a letter suggesting that as I had carried out the work which SHOULD have been done by both the original creditor and themselves, then I was entitled to bill them for it. My bill came to £10 more than they were claiming. I can't say for sure that I have heard the last of it, but it has been very quiet since I sent it two months ago.

 

In your case, you have had to chase up the insurers and try to get sensible answers from the DCA, none of which has been forthcoming. This, together with the unreasonable abuse you have received from the DCA should be worth more than they say you owe.

 

Offer to pay them £33 in full and final settlement if you wish, but don't send the cheque until you have it in writing that they will accept it, and carefully check the wording of their response! In fact, post it up here so that we can all have a look at it. Just to reiterate - don't accept any phone calls from them - you want everything in writing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...