Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

My Grandmother v MBNA


***inca***
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5530 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My nan's balance with them is around the 6,500 mark. Her limit being 7,000. They have told her she is living beyond her means and have stopped the card.

 

Last month she received her statement and the interest has gone up drastically, so much so that she can't afford to make the repayments. My father (without me knowing) wrote a letter to MBNA on her behalf saying that she is in difficulty and that would they accept payments of 105. per month and could they please freeze/lower the interest.

 

She has been waiting over two weeks for a reply. In the meantime they haven't stopped calling her. She now tells them she won't confirm any security details and puts the phone down (on my instruction) but they are still calling.

 

I CCA'd them yesterday for her and sent a telephone harrassment letter.

 

This morning she received a reply to her original 105 offer letter (which I still think is far too high an amount for her to be paying when she is on income support, disabled benefits etc) and she is now very worried. I have reassured her as best I can.

 

The letter states:

 

If she goes onto a reduced payment plan it will affect her credit rating for the entirety of the debt.

 

When she has paid the amount off it will remain on her credit file for 6 years.

 

She will not be able to obtain credit for the smallest of things, eg; mobile phone contract.

 

 

It then waffles on a bit and lastly says that they want her to ring them (despite her saying verbally and in that orginal letter to them that she will communicate in writing ONLY) to discusss a payment plan, and that she must do that within 2 days.

 

Needless to say she is worried, and I want to go and thump the buggers for worrying my lovely nan.

 

I am of the view that she ignores the bullying letter and waits for see what happens with the CCA req.

 

Do you agree? I am worried for her :(

Never argue with an idiot, they'll bring you down to their level and beat you on experience ;)

 

Inca V Crapital One: Low monthly payments accepted - Paid

Inca V HSBC (Charges): WON - Charge reversed.

Inca V Barclaycard/CSL: Complaint sent after CSL illegally took money from my account. Dispute ready to send: Not heard anything since March 2009! Jan 2011 Rc'd letter from new debt collectors saying they have bought the debt. Joy!

Inca's Nan V Saga Card: Utter *****!! Low payments eventually accepted

Inca's Nan V MBNA: Low payments accepted

Inca's sister V Moorcroft: WON. Low payments accepted.

Inca's sister V Thames Credit: Nothing received. Dispute sent 08/01/09: Not heard a dicky bird since March 2009!

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The legendary Fuzzybobble :D

 

Thanks for your reply, I'll tell her not to worry or panic about it.

 

Hopefully they won't be able to come back with anything enforcable! They were also asking in the letter for details of her incomes, who she owes money to and how much etc. She is worried that they will then get in touch with other people she owes money to (catalogues etc) and that they will take away her credit and she won't be able to buy so much as a pair of knickers ever again :rolleyes: (her words, not mine lol) ...

 

IF the agreement is enforcable does she have to send an expenses sheet to them, and if so does she have to list creditors by name?

Never argue with an idiot, they'll bring you down to their level and beat you on experience ;)

 

Inca V Crapital One: Low monthly payments accepted - Paid

Inca V HSBC (Charges): WON - Charge reversed.

Inca V Barclaycard/CSL: Complaint sent after CSL illegally took money from my account. Dispute ready to send: Not heard anything since March 2009! Jan 2011 Rc'd letter from new debt collectors saying they have bought the debt. Joy!

Inca's Nan V Saga Card: Utter *****!! Low payments eventually accepted

Inca's Nan V MBNA: Low payments accepted

Inca's sister V Moorcroft: WON. Low payments accepted.

Inca's sister V Thames Credit: Nothing received. Dispute sent 08/01/09: Not heard a dicky bird since March 2009!

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the link, I recognise the letterheads from the correspondence my nan has.

 

I'll tell her to fill nothing in at all if they send her anything else. It's all sent to worry you into paying isn't it - did try explaining all of that to her, bullying tactics etc.

 

I cannot believe they would have the cheek to ask for all that info! :eek: Then again, after being on these forums, I shouldn't expect anything less really :p

Never argue with an idiot, they'll bring you down to their level and beat you on experience ;)

 

Inca V Crapital One: Low monthly payments accepted - Paid

Inca V HSBC (Charges): WON - Charge reversed.

Inca V Barclaycard/CSL: Complaint sent after CSL illegally took money from my account. Dispute ready to send: Not heard anything since March 2009! Jan 2011 Rc'd letter from new debt collectors saying they have bought the debt. Joy!

Inca's Nan V Saga Card: Utter *****!! Low payments eventually accepted

Inca's Nan V MBNA: Low payments accepted

Inca's sister V Moorcroft: WON. Low payments accepted.

Inca's sister V Thames Credit: Nothing received. Dispute sent 08/01/09: Not heard a dicky bird since March 2009!

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Avoid talking to them on the phone, unless you're recording it and using a judge judy soundboard. Then it's fine. ;)

 

I found a George Bush soundboard the other day, very entertaining :-D

 

One thing you can pull them up on when they send it, is the secured loan application to sort out your credit card arrears. It's against OFT guidelines to tell you to obtain more credit to pay them. Make sure you complain to both MBNA and the OFT when the time comes. :D

 

Would they really do that?! Maybe they are worried as she's 76 now :wink:

Never argue with an idiot, they'll bring you down to their level and beat you on experience ;)

 

Inca V Crapital One: Low monthly payments accepted - Paid

Inca V HSBC (Charges): WON - Charge reversed.

Inca V Barclaycard/CSL: Complaint sent after CSL illegally took money from my account. Dispute ready to send: Not heard anything since March 2009! Jan 2011 Rc'd letter from new debt collectors saying they have bought the debt. Joy!

Inca's Nan V Saga Card: Utter *****!! Low payments eventually accepted

Inca's Nan V MBNA: Low payments accepted

Inca's sister V Moorcroft: WON. Low payments accepted.

Inca's sister V Thames Credit: Nothing received. Dispute sent 08/01/09: Not heard a dicky bird since March 2009!

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh really....

Never argue with an idiot, they'll bring you down to their level and beat you on experience ;)

 

Inca V Crapital One: Low monthly payments accepted - Paid

Inca V HSBC (Charges): WON - Charge reversed.

Inca V Barclaycard/CSL: Complaint sent after CSL illegally took money from my account. Dispute ready to send: Not heard anything since March 2009! Jan 2011 Rc'd letter from new debt collectors saying they have bought the debt. Joy!

Inca's Nan V Saga Card: Utter *****!! Low payments eventually accepted

Inca's Nan V MBNA: Low payments accepted

Inca's sister V Moorcroft: WON. Low payments accepted.

Inca's sister V Thames Credit: Nothing received. Dispute sent 08/01/09: Not heard a dicky bird since March 2009!

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that, will bear that in mind for future use.

 

I just wish they would ring her when I am there with her! :D

Never argue with an idiot, they'll bring you down to their level and beat you on experience ;)

 

Inca V Crapital One: Low monthly payments accepted - Paid

Inca V HSBC (Charges): WON - Charge reversed.

Inca V Barclaycard/CSL: Complaint sent after CSL illegally took money from my account. Dispute ready to send: Not heard anything since March 2009! Jan 2011 Rc'd letter from new debt collectors saying they have bought the debt. Joy!

Inca's Nan V Saga Card: Utter *****!! Low payments eventually accepted

Inca's Nan V MBNA: Low payments accepted

Inca's sister V Moorcroft: WON. Low payments accepted.

Inca's sister V Thames Credit: Nothing received. Dispute sent 08/01/09: Not heard a dicky bird since March 2009!

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's a good point there, will do that.

 

Cheers!

Never argue with an idiot, they'll bring you down to their level and beat you on experience ;)

 

Inca V Crapital One: Low monthly payments accepted - Paid

Inca V HSBC (Charges): WON - Charge reversed.

Inca V Barclaycard/CSL: Complaint sent after CSL illegally took money from my account. Dispute ready to send: Not heard anything since March 2009! Jan 2011 Rc'd letter from new debt collectors saying they have bought the debt. Joy!

Inca's Nan V Saga Card: Utter *****!! Low payments eventually accepted

Inca's Nan V MBNA: Low payments accepted

Inca's sister V Moorcroft: WON. Low payments accepted.

Inca's sister V Thames Credit: Nothing received. Dispute sent 08/01/09: Not heard a dicky bird since March 2009!

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I think this could be it, let me know what you think!

 

Photocopy of small slip they sent

 

MBNA009PAINT.jpg

 

Close up - left

 

MBNA010Paint.jpg

 

Close up - right

 

MBNA011Paint.jpg

 

Then there's a photocopy of 'Financial and Related Conditions' - left side

 

MBNA013.jpg

 

And the right side

 

MBNA014.jpg

 

She has then been sent what seems to be a PC print out that's all of her details from when she applied, it seems she did it on the net. It gives her bank name, employment, address, email Income etc (I haven't scanned this, all it is are personal details and what she filled in on the net.

 

She has also been sent current terms and conditions (It says this is the agreement for her to keep on the top)

 

MBNA015.jpg

 

MBNA016.jpg

 

MBNA017.jpg

 

MBNA018.jpg

 

 

What do we think? My face dropped when I opened it :(

Never argue with an idiot, they'll bring you down to their level and beat you on experience ;)

 

Inca V Crapital One: Low monthly payments accepted - Paid

Inca V HSBC (Charges): WON - Charge reversed.

Inca V Barclaycard/CSL: Complaint sent after CSL illegally took money from my account. Dispute ready to send: Not heard anything since March 2009! Jan 2011 Rc'd letter from new debt collectors saying they have bought the debt. Joy!

Inca's Nan V Saga Card: Utter *****!! Low payments eventually accepted

Inca's Nan V MBNA: Low payments accepted

Inca's sister V Moorcroft: WON. Low payments accepted.

Inca's sister V Thames Credit: Nothing received. Dispute sent 08/01/09: Not heard a dicky bird since March 2009!

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did it on my phon, hence why it's all a little dodgy :D When I use the flash it just puts a blob of light on it - maybe I could use photoshop on it?

 

Yes, it was done on the internet. My dad filled it out for her.

 

Thanks Davey - are you basically saying that as there are not two signatures there that it's not the correct documentation?

 

What should our next course of action be?

 

She's 76 and is very worried about all of this, they were calling her constantly but stopped after my second telephone harrassment letter.

 

She has visions of being carted off to prison and bailiffs coming and taking all of her bits and bobs :Cry:

Never argue with an idiot, they'll bring you down to their level and beat you on experience ;)

 

Inca V Crapital One: Low monthly payments accepted - Paid

Inca V HSBC (Charges): WON - Charge reversed.

Inca V Barclaycard/CSL: Complaint sent after CSL illegally took money from my account. Dispute ready to send: Not heard anything since March 2009! Jan 2011 Rc'd letter from new debt collectors saying they have bought the debt. Joy!

Inca's Nan V Saga Card: Utter *****!! Low payments eventually accepted

Inca's Nan V MBNA: Low payments accepted

Inca's sister V Moorcroft: WON. Low payments accepted.

Inca's sister V Thames Credit: Nothing received. Dispute sent 08/01/09: Not heard a dicky bird since March 2009!

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you. I have done my best to reassure her and have explained to her how things work and that she shouldn't be worried etc.

 

You think I should write to them asking for more or send the dispute/two signature argument as you have suggested on my Cap One and Barclaycard threads?

Never argue with an idiot, they'll bring you down to their level and beat you on experience ;)

 

Inca V Crapital One: Low monthly payments accepted - Paid

Inca V HSBC (Charges): WON - Charge reversed.

Inca V Barclaycard/CSL: Complaint sent after CSL illegally took money from my account. Dispute ready to send: Not heard anything since March 2009! Jan 2011 Rc'd letter from new debt collectors saying they have bought the debt. Joy!

Inca's Nan V Saga Card: Utter *****!! Low payments eventually accepted

Inca's Nan V MBNA: Low payments accepted

Inca's sister V Moorcroft: WON. Low payments accepted.

Inca's sister V Thames Credit: Nothing received. Dispute sent 08/01/09: Not heard a dicky bird since March 2009!

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi Davey, have you had any luck with your MBNA?

 

I have the dispute all ready to send tomorrow (if I can get to the PO past the snow!) for my nan...do you think I should send an Subject Access Request too?

 

Edited to add: Could they say that the date stamp/signature is all they need to put on it from their side?

Never argue with an idiot, they'll bring you down to their level and beat you on experience ;)

 

Inca V Crapital One: Low monthly payments accepted - Paid

Inca V HSBC (Charges): WON - Charge reversed.

Inca V Barclaycard/CSL: Complaint sent after CSL illegally took money from my account. Dispute ready to send: Not heard anything since March 2009! Jan 2011 Rc'd letter from new debt collectors saying they have bought the debt. Joy!

Inca's Nan V Saga Card: Utter *****!! Low payments eventually accepted

Inca's Nan V MBNA: Low payments accepted

Inca's sister V Moorcroft: WON. Low payments accepted.

Inca's sister V Thames Credit: Nothing received. Dispute sent 08/01/09: Not heard a dicky bird since March 2009!

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Davey

 

(Thank you so much for your help on my threads by the way, you're a star)

 

I am forgetting I have already sent MBNA a dispute letter, and in reply to it was sent all of the jargon above.

 

Should I simply send an Subject Access Request to them?

 

Actually I am going to write to them asking them if that is all they have with regard to the full original agreement, if they don't play ball, then I shall hit them with an SAR.

Edited by ***inca***

Never argue with an idiot, they'll bring you down to their level and beat you on experience ;)

 

Inca V Crapital One: Low monthly payments accepted - Paid

Inca V HSBC (Charges): WON - Charge reversed.

Inca V Barclaycard/CSL: Complaint sent after CSL illegally took money from my account. Dispute ready to send: Not heard anything since March 2009! Jan 2011 Rc'd letter from new debt collectors saying they have bought the debt. Joy!

Inca's Nan V Saga Card: Utter *****!! Low payments eventually accepted

Inca's Nan V MBNA: Low payments accepted

Inca's sister V Moorcroft: WON. Low payments accepted.

Inca's sister V Thames Credit: Nothing received. Dispute sent 08/01/09: Not heard a dicky bird since March 2009!

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

My nan has been in a bit of bother with MBNA recently, I have sent CCA requests and default letters on her behalf. They have sent a hotch potch CCA to her which is when I then sent the default.

 

They are now getting very nasty and my nan is worried so pleaded with me to write them a letter offering them reduced payments of £65 a month.

 

I wrote to them and did this for her under protest!

 

Anyway yesterday they rang her (I have sent telephone harrassment forms and they haven't rung for weeks so she thought it was safe to pick up the phone) and said that they wanted to come to some kind of agreement. My nan then said that it was me and her daughter that were dealing with it and MBNA asked if either me or my mum could speak to them.

 

Well my mum spoke to them today and they said that they would be prepared to come to an arrangement with her but first of all they would need all income and expenditure details. My nan does not want them to see these details - she can afford more than £65 a month but wants to be able to live comfortably so obviously wants some money for herself (she is on income support).

 

My mum said that she thought only a judge could insist on seeing I&E forms and that we wouldn't be sending any. MBNA said that they can insist and so can banks as it's special cirumstances.

 

Can they insist in I&E forms??

 

Also, when my mum said no to sending them they then said that they would be passing the matter on to their litigation department.

 

Now, it this just two blokes sat in a different corner of the MBNA office? or is it more serious than that?

 

What would your advice be? My nan just wants this over and done with, she has said there is no way she will step into a court room, she is too frightened.

 

I have been waiting for them to pass it on to a DCA as I know they will take the £65, but MBNA seem to be persistant blighters!

  • Haha 1

Never argue with an idiot, they'll bring you down to their level and beat you on experience ;)

 

Inca V Crapital One: Low monthly payments accepted - Paid

Inca V HSBC (Charges): WON - Charge reversed.

Inca V Barclaycard/CSL: Complaint sent after CSL illegally took money from my account. Dispute ready to send: Not heard anything since March 2009! Jan 2011 Rc'd letter from new debt collectors saying they have bought the debt. Joy!

Inca's Nan V Saga Card: Utter *****!! Low payments eventually accepted

Inca's Nan V MBNA: Low payments accepted

Inca's sister V Moorcroft: WON. Low payments accepted.

Inca's sister V Thames Credit: Nothing received. Dispute sent 08/01/09: Not heard a dicky bird since March 2009!

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...