Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • @Man in the middle I've been searching the forum and you seem very knowledgeable. Would you mind giving a look at my query please? Thanks in advance!!
    • Thanks for this! I'm still not clear if I'm facing more than 6 points on my license though. Can you explain any further please? When I accept the 2nd speeding ticket, will they just charge me £100 and 3 points, or will they be more severe concenquences since that offense took place the following day of the 1st offense? Similarly, when I accept the 3rd offense, will they look at my record or just charge me with the £100 fine and 3 points?
    • Yes of course. That's why it says cc:: BIg Motoring World at the bottom. Don't imagine that this solves the issue. It doesn't. He not have to force the finance company and big motoring world to accept the rejection to give your money back. I suggest that you get the letter off tomorrow. And let us know what you hear but on Friday you should then send a threat to the finance company.   Have a look what I have said here about your options and read the whole thread as well.  
    • Been perusing the actual figures on the polls above wondering where the '16% claimed for deform comes from? I understand that there are 'weighted' end results based on secret calculations ...   Probably going to repeat this later, but remember that the ukip/brexit/reform/deform party has ALWAYS had poll speculation FAR better than their actual  performance at elections - by large margins. SO: The labor and Tory votes come largely from simply the people who say they will vote for them - sorted Lab 43% Tory 20%, with maybe another small 1-2% coming from the weightings of the 'not sures' Greens largely get what is declared from 'other' , although with another declared green bit from the 'pressed' question   So as the share of the voting displayed in 'other' granted to reform/deform is around 11%, where does the '16% too often being reported come from? Seems that reform has been granted as beneficiary of effectively ALL the don't knows and wont says, who when pressed didn't actually declare for someone else ... effectively adding 40%+ to their reported polling % - rather strange given their consistent under-performance compared to polling - or perhaps that is the cause of the higher rating eh?   Now I admit the possibility (probability?) of wingers being ashamed of declaring their support for the yuckey lemon end of the spectrum ... but surely  that should affect the 'Torys as well? Maybe the statisticians have simply weighted in that deform wingers are simply more likely to lie?   But - without 'weightings' and assumptions that faragits will get everything that isnt declared as a definite and unequivocal 'not that Piers Morgan' - reform is on around 11% it seems.   Add to that the history of polling a lot less than the hype - and the simple fact that faragit wingers seem to be spread across the country (presumably skulking in their moms spare room despite being 45+) and greens and lib dems seem to be community minded - I think two seats will be an epic result for farage. Hardly the opposition - far more raving wingnut party.   and importantly - Has farage got a home in clacton yet?
    • "as I have no tools available to merge documents, unless you can suggest any free ones that will perform offline merges without watermarking" (which you don't) ... but ok please upload the documents and we'll go from there
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Need some advice re: Assured Shorthold Tenancy


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5667 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I'm coming to the end of an Assurted Shorthold Tenancy that lasted six months, and I've given notice to my landlord that I will not be renewing my contract and I will be vacating the property at the end of the period.

 

The contract was signed in June and states it is for a fixed period of six months, although no end date has been stated in the contract. In the contract, there is no provision for the requirement of written notice to be required.

 

The letting agency have said that under the Housing Act of 1988 that I am required to give 30 days notice and as such, I will be liable for rent until the 30th day of notice. The notice was only given today in writing.

 

The letting agent has informed me that an AST automatically is a rolling tenancy to protect the landlord from having empty rooms in the property and losing out on money.

 

Since I'm not staying beyond the fixed term then why should I be liable for rent? I'm moving out on the date I've told them as I've arranged with my new landlord to move in and paid what's required to move in.

 

I was expecting that come the date of the end of the fixed term that I would be able to move out and not cause a problem. It is a shared house but individual contracts, ie no joint and several terms included in mine. Why is it my problem if the Landlord is losing money for having an empty room?

 

The notice I will have given will be ten days.

 

Any advice is greatly appreciated.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you move out on or before the last day of the tenancy then you have to give no notice - you have a fixed term contract which has ended.

 

If you stay for 1 day longer then you have to give notice to the end of that rent period as it becomes a statutory periodic tenancy

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are various Housing Acts that are relevant to ASTs, 2004 just happens to be the latest one. A new act doesnt necessarily supersede previous acts.

 

Housing Act 1988 is correct, this deals with, amongst other things, statutory periodic tenancies. Housing Act 2004, amongst other things, deals with Tenancy Deposit Schemes, but doesnt 'update' the 1988 act in terms of periodic tenancies etc.

 

The rest of what your agents have told you may or may not be correct. Its odd that the tenancy doesnt have an end date written but you can work this out yourself. The end date will be 6 months after the date the agreement began. If you go over that date by even 1 day, then as your agents have stated, a periodic (month on month) tenancy will begin. You are required to give one full calander month notice to end the tenancy, finishing on the same date of the month that the fixed term finished.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah, thanks for clearing that up.

 

The start date was the 21st June and runs for six months, so that would take the end of the fixed term to the 21st December? I've worked on this as six instances of the 21st day in the following months, rather than 182.5 days which I assume is the correct way to do this? By doing this I informed in my notice that vacating the property over the weekend directly before the 21st.

 

That's correct?

Link to post
Share on other sites

That date is fine for me to be out of the property on, although the Letting Agent only open half a day in the morning. It's unlikely I could move everything out of the house and be back in town to give them the keys by the time they close. Does that have an impact on things?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...