Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • wont go near it with a barge pole as its ex gov't debt.  
    • Thanks, I've had my fill of this lot. What makes me so mad is that I had to take out student loan to get any DHSS help. And then when I tried to help myself and family they presented obstacles. Might be worth passing story to RIP off Britain?
    • there is NO exposure if you simple remove your name address/ref numbers etc from docs, over 10'000 pdf uploads are here. which then harvests IP addresses off of the people that then do so..which is why we do not allow hosting sites. read our rules and upload carefully thats exactly why we say capture as JPG, redact, then convert/merge to one mass PDF. then online sites to achieve that we list do not leave watermarks.  every once in a while we have a user like you that thinks they know better...we've been doing it since 2006 with not one security issue. thank you.
    • was at the time you ticked it  but now they've still not complied . if you read up, here , you'll see thats what everyone does,  
    • no they never allow the age related get out, erudio are masters at faking supposed 'arrears' fees which were levied before said date and thus null its write off. 1000's of threads here on them!! scammers untied that lot. i can almost guarantee they'll state it's not SB'd too re above, but just ignore them once sent. dx    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

ARC / Trevor Munn


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5673 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi all, I've seen there are a few mentions of these businesses on here, I hope someone may be able to suggest a next step?

 

my partner has received letters from ARC (Europe) Ltd. and Trevor Munn solicitors, chasing a debt for unpaid gym (David Lloyd) membership.

 

the story is...

 

- she took out a gym membership earlier this year which she would pay monthly by DD

 

- the first payment failed as the gym set up the DD on the wrong date, when there were insufficient funds in her account

 

- when this was discovered, she paid for this 1 month in cash at the gym and asked for the DD to be reset to the correct date... they said ok.

 

- it turns out they didn't do this and the DD failed for a second time, which she only found out about when she went for a session at the gym and was told her membership had been terminated.

 

so we thought no more of it, made sure any DD was then cancelled so they didn't continue to take money after the termination.

 

Last week (a number of months later) she received a letter from ARC Europe, saying she owed £690, "a bad debt passed onto ARC from the gym who have been unable to obtain payment from you"

 

We have never received ANY correspondence from the gym asking for payment! The membership had been terminated.

 

She phoned ARC immediately and said this as a mistake as her membership had been terminated and she would contact the gym... they said ok.

 

Then a week later, received a letter on behalf of ARC from Trevor Munn Solicitors threatening Court action and demanding payment immediately.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Basically, your partner signed up for a set period membership, they are trying to claim the value of the full fixed term even though that period has not expired yet. I would expect the terms and conditions to include a clause which states something along the lines of, "cancellation of the greement will render you liable for the full amount of the membership."

 

Were there any written communications between your partner and the gym prior to the termination of the membership?

 

were there any communications regarding the failed DD prior to the DCA taking over the account

Link to post
Share on other sites

Basically, your partner signed up for a set period membership, they are trying to claim the value of the full fixed term even though that period has not expired yet. I would expect the terms and conditions to include a clause which states something along the lines of, "cancellation of the greement will render you liable for the full amount of the membership."

 

Were there any written communications between your partner and the gym prior to the termination of the membership?

 

were there any communications regarding the failed DD prior to the DCA taking over the account

 

i'll have a look in the small print to see if there is something along those lines.

 

the only written correspondence there has been from the gym prior to the termination, was a letter to say that they had set the incorrect date for the DD (should have been the 1st, they set it for the 10th).

 

when my partner was told the first DD failed, she went into the gym to pay the amount in cash and asked to confirm that the DD would be re-set to the 1st (as agreed on her contract). But it wasn't changed and remained on the 10th and it failed again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...