Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Morgan Stanley CCA- received Barclaycard terms in response**WON, THEN WON AGAIN!!!**


noomill060
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5495 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Applied for a Morgan Stanley card back in 1999. MS credit card business was bought by Goldfish, who in turn were bought out by Barclaycard this year. The deal was finalised in September and I receieved a Barclaycard Cashback card as replacement for my previous MS card.

 

I CCA'd Barclaycard in October.

 

In response, today I received a reasonable photo/microfiche copy of Barclaycard's conditions, apparently from the time I applied for my MS card.

 

A true copy of my original Morgan Stanley credit agreement, it aint.

 

What is the position with this. The ownership of this account has passed through three companies since I applied.

 

Do Barclaycard need to provide me with a copy of the original company's, or can they fob me off with their own?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 268
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 2 weeks later...

Methinks that they dont have the original agreement.

 

The "Conditions" above are not very legible, but as they arent related to the actual account, that appears to be irelavent. The important thing as I see it is that they are BARCLAYCARD conditions- not MORGAN STANLEY!

 

Question is- how I do use this apparent lack of agreement in the POC for a claim I will be making for return of PPI premiums applied to the account by Morgan Stanley in 2000-2002?

 

The premiums and interest levied thereon make up 70% of the statement balance.

 

I have written to Barclaycard stating that I do not acknowledge any debt and also sent a s.10 notice telling them to cease processing of personal data due to lack of any evidence that I gave my consent. Consent would have been included in a credit agreement, but they dont appear to have one.

 

I will be asking for an order to comply with my s.10 request as well.

 

 

They havent written back but I have been receiving idiot auto dailer calls to which I have only spoken to them once, today and told them I dispute any debt and will communicate in writing only. The call centre muppet said that it all went over his head and put a block on further idiot calls for 14 days.

 

As they dont appear to have an agreement I would will also ask the court for a declaration of unenforceability. If they wish to defend, they will need to produce a valid agreement with a signature, presumably. A bit hard of they dont have one.

 

 

This is concerning a 1999 agreement for a MORGAN STANLEY card- not a Barclaycard.

 

Barclaycard are now the owners of ex-MS accounts.

 

The card is now called a "Barclaycard Cashback"

Edited by noomill060
Link to post
Share on other sites

Is the answer staring me in the face- that this document has no other use other than as a paper dart and that they remain in default of my s.78 CCA request? ( now long passed the 12+2 days)

 

I have told them as much and they havent written back to deny it, in fact they havent written at all, apart from the documents posted above.

 

You would have thought that they could at least have written to ask for payment arrears!

Edited by noomill060
Link to post
Share on other sites

That's been done, pinky.

 

What I next plan to do is claim back the PPI premiums and a few charges.

 

If they dont have an agreement to say I agreed to pay them, that should theoretically make it open and shut- and a declaration that the agreement is unenforcable would be the cherry on the top! The PPI will almost wipe out the account balance, just leaving a few buttons outstanding.

 

(And should also mean they have to pay me the PPI direct, preventing them simply knocking off the PPI from the balance)

 

The interest on the PPI premiums is of course growing on a daily basis and will wipe the entire balance in a few months

 

Im putting a POC together.

Edited by noomill060
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi gil, thanks. I suppose I actually know the answer mtself and going by past experience Barclays will only respond to legal action and will simply roll over as usual, after realising they arent dealing with a muppet.

 

I'll go by gut instinct and file against them tomorrow.

 

Got that Barclaycard? Its game on.

 

Yeah baby - LETS PARTY!!!!

 

 

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi patma- I have only just stopped paying this account this month- they have been auto dialing me 4 times a day until this afternoon when I put one of their monkeys in the picture.

 

Monkeyman told me he would place a two week block on the auto dialer and asked if I was in the legal profession.

 

A SAR'd Morgan Stanley two years ago to get my statements for my charges reclaim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Filed my claim today.

 

Interestingly, I had a call from Emma Thompson at Barclays Lititgation Team (BLT) last night. Said she had just recieved a letter I sent on 27 November telling them they hadnt responded to my LBA and that I would thus be filing at my convenience

 

Emma said that BCard hadnt recieved my LBA dated 8 November (sent to local branch, got Proof of Posting)

 

Emma Thompson is in the team dealing with charges claims. She wanted to know if this was a Goldfish card. Told her it was a Morgan Stanley card and that I had CCAd them and got Barclaycard T&C in response.

 

Told her that I would be claiming for a few charges and a lot of PPI premiums citing failure of consideration and that as they didnt have my credit agreement it would appear they appeared to be lacking in the leg to stand on department.

 

Interestingly, Emma didnt ask any questions to confirm my identity. (woops!)

 

Said she would be passing my letter on to the PPI dude.

 

This morning said PPI dude (Antonio Lombardi) phoned me (again failing to confirm my ID)

 

Told me that he would be asking Morgan Stanley for my credit agreement. He seemed to think that I should quake in my slippers at this news!

 

(This would appear to suggest that BCard dont have ex-MS credit card agreements if they have to ask MS for them)

 

Also, Lombardi wanted to know where I sent my LBA- I told him I'd sent it to my local Barclays branch, he said it hadnt been passed on.

 

(Not my problem, dude. I got proof of posting)

 

Anyway, Lombardi very keen that I send my claim form and POC to BCard Central at Churchhill Place rather than local branch - "In case we dont get it in time"

 

Now, that would be a shame. Again- not my problem, dude.

 

Im in N.Ireland- different jurisdiction to England/Wales. If you file here with the defendants address in England, the court sends you the claim straight back and you have to complete an outside jurisdiction form to get them serve the claim. This takes at least a week. After that, the defendant get an extra two weeks to enter a defence (6 weeks, instead of 4)

 

I filed today giving the local Barclays branch as the address to serve the papers.

 

If the local staff dont pass these papers on to BCard, that aint my problem.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they want to defend this they would have to use a N.Ireland registered solicitor. N.Ireland is a different jurisdiction and solicitors from England/Wales are barred from practising here.

 

In the event that wouldnt prove a problem for them though, Im sure they have solicitors they use here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK dood, cheers!

 

Is it acceptable, apart from that?

 

I wanted to give them plenty to think about and get all my gripes over with in one go.

 

(Always seems a bit OTT, quoting great tracts of legislation but my local DJ deals with Small Claims by asking questions, she doesnt allow you to make speeches, well she does, but you need to be able to string a coherent sentence together!

 

I've noticed that she always has a copy of Halsbury's on the desk in front of her.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Short answer - no, without a signed credit agreement complying with the consumer credit act, no court can order enforcement. :)

 

You have nothing to lose by making a CCA s.78(1) request for your credit agreement.

 

Chances are, even if they have it, it probably wont be enforceable.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...