Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Council tax refund after re-banding, joint tenant problem


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5692 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello there,

 

My partner (we don't live together) recently got a new housemate and in sorting out all the things you have to sort out queried his council tax banding.

 

It transpired that he was paying more tax on his unit (live work space in a large block) than his neighbours in a block 3 times the size with better facilities, and a lot more than I am banded for my lovely, fully functioning house in a nicer area. So he asked the council and they found that they had just guessed at what band his unit should be without looking inside the building. Result!

 

They assessed the unit and have knocked the band down, I think by 3 bands! So he is due a refund which is great but where the problems start.

 

The council want a letter from the previous housemate to say that he consents to a refund being offered. In normal civilised society this should not cause a problem but this particular guy can be rude and out for himself and very difficult to get in contact with let alone get him to write a letter. On top of this he was listed as the sole payer of council tax as my partner was a full time, post grad. student for most of the time. They had a 25% reduction which meant the old housemate was supposed to pay all of the bill (single person liability I think) but my partner being a nice guy paid part of.

 

So that in terms of the original amount the previous housemate paid 50% and my partner paid 25%.

 

 

Ideally my partner thinks he should get most of the refund as he shouldn't have been paying any of the bill, but is happy to settle with getting half. The previous housemate will probably want half, if not all of it cause his name was on the bill.

 

How can this be negotiated?!

 

The best situation would be if the cheque was written out to my partner (the refund being down to him sorting the whole thing out) and he can then pass on the amount due to the other person.

 

Does anybody know how the council will issue the refund?

 

Morally it seems my partner should get all the money he paid back but is there any way to ensure this?

 

Any tips on getting difficult ex-housemates to cooperate?

 

Thank you!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Refunds are paid by cheque after you have signed an indemnity form.

 

Regards

 

Leon

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...