Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

new court guidance on house repossesions?


mak71
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5712 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Read this yesterday, said was to be implemented mid november

 

"Prime Minister Gordon Brown said new guidance was being given to the courts to halt actions to repossess properties unless all alternatives had been "fully examined"."

 

 

So will the dca"s be issued with any tougher procedures as well?

Looks like the government are going to make mortgage lenders look at all alternatives before filing for repossesion, maybe they should use this legislation to clamp down on the dma"s throwing sd"s about and abusing insolvency laws as well

 

Maybe with the credit crunch and recession the courts might be a little bit more lenient on debtors in court on unsecured debt , especially if they only ended up in court in the first place after dmc"s were trying to be heavy handed?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It will be interesting to see how the government will ensure that its will is done. We've already a seen a less than robust approach to the banks, whose trade association the British Bankers' Association (BBA), criticised about the banks' failure to help small businesses, said that: "in a recession, some firms would "inevitably" fail". Unless they are banks, of course, in which case no matter how dismal their performance, they will be bailed out by the taxpayer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well they are obviously doing nothing at the moment. I just seen a story on the television news about a disabled bloke threatened with repossesion for a debt of less than £250. I was confirmed by the tv news reporter that this was all he owed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Read this yesterday, said was to be implemented mid november

 

"Prime Minister Gordon Brown said new guidance was being given to the courts to halt actions to repossess properties unless all alternatives had been "fully examined"."

 

 

So will the dca"s be issued with any tougher procedures as well?

Looks like the government are going to make mortgage lenders look at all alternatives before filing for repossesion, maybe they should use this legislation to clamp down on the dma"s throwing sd"s about and abusing insolvency laws as well

 

Maybe with the credit crunch and recession the courts might be a little bit more lenient on debtors in court on unsecured debt , especially if they only ended up in court in the first place after dmc"s were trying to be heavy handed?

 

Usual government clap trap, that why this is in the news today.

They must of rearly 'examined the alternatives' NOT

BBC NEWS | Business | Repossession number 'up by 71%'

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...