Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Received a Statutory Demand from Capquest ** WON + COSTS **


Dibsthefrenchie
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4581 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Not a good week as I have now received a statutory Demand from Capquest by 1st class post.

This is for a debt to Capital 1 made up of charges, I intend making a court claim for the charges plus 8% interest which will mean Capital 1 owe me £50!

Please can someone advise what I do now?

Many thanks.

Dibs

Don't know if i'm coming or going!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi 42man, thank you for the advice.

I intend to challenge this SD on charges and also no CCA, I have in writing from Scotcall collecting on Capquest behalf that they unable to obtain a copy of the agreement, the last letter I sent to Capquest was to ask for their complaints procedure and I have not received a reply.

I will look at the threads you have suggested, as I have no idea on how to word my defence.

Dibs.

Don't know if i'm coming or going!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have copied the letters and a duplicate set for Capquest, which I will hand in with my request for a set aside, using beanpole's defence.

42man, you have given me a great deal of help and encouragement this week, I cannot begin to tell you how much I appreciate it, thank you.

Dibs

Don't know if i'm coming or going!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I have received a copy of a letter sent to the court by Capquest, as follows:-

 

We acknowledge receipt of the Application to Set Aside the Statutory Demand.

 

Upon reading the application and the evidence in support it appears that the evidence in support of the application shows that there are no grounds upon which the Statutory Demand should be Set Aside.

 

We do not consider that there are additional matters upon which we will be able to assist the Court at the hearing of the Application to Set Aside the Statutory Demand. In view of this, and with a view to saving costs which could fall upon the applicant, we ask that our attendance at Court on the hearing of the Application to Set Aside be excused.

 

We ask that in our absence an order is made dismissing the Application to Set Aside the Statutory Demand and fixing a date after which we, as the creditor, may proceed to present a petition for bankruptcy to the court. We will not seek any order for costs in relation to the application to set aside.

 

I do intend to attend the court hearing, but is this a usual response from Capquest?

Don't know if i'm coming or going!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Tiglet,

Thank you for your reply.

Capquest did contact me previously to Scotcall, and it states quite clearly on all the correspondence from Scotcall that their client is Capquest.

I have not received a copy of the CCA, the letters sent to Capquest stated that the account is in dispute and has not been resolved, the SD was sent in usual post and the entire debt is made up of charges, if all that fails and the Judge does not grant a set aside, then I shall immediately pay the £19.01 to reduce the amount outstanding to less than the £800 debt required for bankruptcy.

Don't know if i'm coming or going!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The letter also mentioned a statement sent to the court, as follows:

We enclose herewith a statement of ......., who has been working on the Application to set aside Statutory Demand within the Litigation team at Capquest Investments Limited.

I have faxed Capquest for a copy of the statement, not that I believe it will hold any extra information, but, I would still like to see it.

I also made complaints to FOS, OFT and TS, on receipt of the statutory demand, so will print copies for the Judges perusal.

Thanks again 42man.

Don't know if i'm coming or going!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

First of all, Hello & Welcome to the Litigation team at Capquest, perhaps you should read more threads on CAG and actually learn something.

 

CAG members who have received a statutory demand from Capquest and are attending Court for a set aside, may be interested in this part of Capquest's statement of defence:-

 

Image0022.jpg

 

I have seen mention of this on another thread, part of which is copied from gilly5001 below:-

 

"They also suggested that I didnt have my own defence merely a copy of one from this website and they had sent a photocopy of a defence posted on here. I again explained that whilst I had sought advice and help from here I understood what I had submitted. The judge replied that it is fine to get legal advice from the website!!

anyway, set aside awarded and costs !! yippee"

 

( Thanks to gilly5001)

 

Dibs

Don't know if i'm coming or going!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The legal reasons are in the statement, not particularly accurate ones, I just wanted to highlight the absurdity of Capquest stating that it is not a genuine defence as it's been "copied from the Consumer Action Group website".

The copy statement sent to me is unsigned. I do have another thread for this, but just wanted to bring it to the attention of people who feel intimidated by Capquest.

 

Capquest are refusing the set aside on three points:

1. They have denied receiving a request for a copy of the Agreement or statements, despite my having evidence to the contrary.

2. I used the credit card to make purchases, copy statements prove this.

3. I have copied my defence from CAG

 

I am requesting the set aside based on:

1. Not having copied my defence from CAG, but have taken advice from CAG and many other sources, including Debtline.

2. The whole balance allegedly outstanding is entirely made up of charges.

3. I sent a request for a copy of the CCA to Capquest's collection agents, that request was acknowledged with "Contact has been made with our client and I advise that we are unable to obtain a copy of the agreement".

 

I can produce evidence for each of my statements.

 

Dibs.

Don't know if i'm coming or going!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Beanpole,

Thank you for all the information, it's really appreciated.

The court date is in the next fortnight. I have searched the net and read and re-read the forums, have even bought a debt advice book! I feel confident about my argument, but nervous at the thought of attending court, will be so glad to get it over with.

I found your thread extremely helpful, so a big thank you for that.

Dibs.

Don't know if i'm coming or going!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tiglet, thank you for your support.

 

PT, thank you for the information on Hammond's, it sum's up my situation brilliantly. I have spent hours searching for anything and everything that supports my case, and that one snippet is perfect!

 

Dibs

Don't know if i'm coming or going!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Thank you for changing the Title, it's a pleasant sight!

The Judge looked at CapQuests statement and then asked me to address each of the points raised;

  • Capquest purchased the debt from Capital One, I haven't had a copy of the Assignment: the Judge did not have one either!
  • I have received a copy of the Agreement: I have actually been sent a copy of the Application & post dated T&C's, the Judge checked the copies sent to the Court, exactly the same!
  • I have never requested a copy of the Agreement: I produced a copy of the letter requesting a copy of the agreement, and also the reply, the Judge was really not happy with the person who signed the statement on that one!
  • I refer to a copy of the signed Credit Agreement, and the highlighted part "We may transfer our rights and benefits under this agreement at any time: same answer as before, Assignment and the relevant T&C's might help!
  • I copied my defence from CAG: The Judge did not see the relevance of that one, and it did not require addressing.

The Judge set the SD aside, and I asked the Judge to consider my costs, they were granted.

 

So, thank you so much to 42man for all the advice, and to everyone for the help and support.

Tiglet, you were right, there really is nothing to fear in attending Court.

 

Dibs x

  • Haha 1

Don't know if i'm coming or going!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Judge did not seem happy with the accuracy of the statement from Capquest, and would have liked some questions answered, but of course they didn't attend.

I made a point of stating that it would appear the whole exercise was to intimidate me into paying, irrespective of the alleged debt being disputed!

Don't know if i'm coming or going!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...