Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Just a typo change that I'd make for the last line. Maybe also add something that says "I assume you will be fully aware that you cannot rely on a clause of a contract that you do not produce."
    • Hello, Firstly, and most importantly I am sorry for your loss. I would go back to the bank with the death certificate and ask them to step in. Remind them firmly but politely that there is no limit for DD claims   Please let us know how you get on.
    • My wife is the named person to his bank account with him having Dementia being his daughter (I say named person she still is but he recently passed away and the deputyship application has now being stopped by the solicitor as it's no longer needed) We've only just got the Death Certificate so the bank will be the next step informing them. She went to the bank and explained the situation but even being his named person the bank said she didn't have the power to stop DD without any legal documents (virgin money) was the bank. She could have copies of bank statements that was about it.
    • I see you said you tried to stop the DD but it seems that didn't work. May I please ask why that didn't work? You should be asking your bank to cancel the DD and I don't see why they would have objected, hopefully you can clarify this. I agree that you should be making a claim here against your bank and ask them for a DD refund. There is no timeframes for this.
    • JK: Yeah That's correct. We left rent payment coming out of his bank account from January 2023 - August 2023 until we could find somewhere to sort out his belongings which was fine. I tried to give notice a few times from August 2023 asking for advice from Sanctuary housing how we went about this explaining his condition and that he was in a Nursing home from December 2022. I explained we don't have any legal powers to his account like POT but were in the process of going for Deputyship and that I was the named person to act on his behalf to speak with Santuary housing. I said we could provide details of his condition and proof he was now in a nursing home with date he moved in. This went ignored despite repeated attempts to contact them until a housing manager contacted us end of February 2024 and notice was finally accepted with his tenancy coming to an end March 22 2024. Although they have continued to take rental payments for the flat despite someone else living in it from the 1st April. I wasn't aware payments were still being taken till I checked his May banks statements. I had asked them to back date rental payments to August 2023 when I gave notice rather than just giving notice in March 2024 but they've ignored that bit. I don't see why they shouldn't give it back they've taken money they shouldn't have. Thanks DX, I wasn't aware we could do that for that length of time. I'll ask my wife to check with the bank this week
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lloyds Business loan secured, help needed please


Lloyds Defender
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5571 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Firstly,

 

The wife should have sought independent legal advice; the same solicitor should not have advised both parties.

 

The bank can postpone its first charge, but still remain on the deeds.

 

Yes we have been told this but they don't seam to care about little points like that.

 

I don't understand your second point, the bank don't have a first charge the building sociaty do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gizmo, what is an ERC?

 

Early Redemption Charge - it is a charge you may have for paying off your mortgage before a certain time - sometimes known as a tie-in period. If you have one then it will bring the cost of the selling higher and make the net equity less.

 

I know professional advice is expensive - but you need some to be sure you are doing the right thing - I am not qualified in insolvency.

 

Let us know what the IP's say.

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Early Redemption Charge - it is a charge you may have for paying off your mortgage before a certain time - sometimes known as a tie-in period. If you have one then it will bring the cost of the selling higher and make the net equity less.

 

I know professional advice is expensive - but you need some to be sure you are doing the right thing - I am not qualified in insolvency.

 

Let us know what the IP's say.

 

No there is no redemption charge.

 

IP's said "get a Solicitor".

 

Round we go.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as I am aware the liqidator of your bankruptcy will negotiate a sale price of your half to your wife can she rais between £8 to £13 grand I think that all that will happen is ammber will agree for the deeds to go in her name there is no sale envolved can I sugest you make enquires with the Law socierty for a firm near you who specalise in insolvency

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you are going to have bite he bullet and book an appointment with a solicitor.

Is there any possibility of your wife raising the amount needed over the next 12 months?

What stage are Lloyds at with the possession order?

I suggest you post the question over here as well.

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you are going to have bite he bullet and book an appointment with a solicitor.

Is there any possibility of your wife raising the amount needed over the next 12 months?

What stage are Lloyds at with the possession order?

I suggest you post the question over here as well.

 

She could borrow the money from her parents.

 

Lloyds are at the application stage, I have to file a defence by Thursday.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They have filed an application for possession of the house only, they have only named me as the defendant and they have not yet filed an application for judgement of the debt, they have filed an application for judgment of the debt from my business partner and now an application for possession of his house.

Gizmo referred me to the fool forum and someone has raised this as a potential stopper. I am trying to find out if they can make an application for possession when they don’t have a judgment to back it up.

However, I don’t know if this is relevant but the security is a “Mortgage of freehold or leasehold property to secure own liabilities”. Does anyone know if this security can be used to secure our Limited companies liabilities?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just looking through the agreements again and found this:

 

3.4 Unless I / we agree otherwise with the bank, this Mortgage shall not secure any liabilities regulated by Part V of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

I have just had a look at Part V Consumer Credit Act 1974 and unless I mistaken it looks like I am protected.

 

Does anyone else think so?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another thought, or am I clutching at straws!

 

Does the Bill of Rights Act 1689 apply in this case? where it says

 

That all grants and promises of fines and forfeitures of particular persons before conviction are illegal and void;

 

The Cambridge Dictionary says that a forfeiture is "the loss of rights, property or money, especially as a result of breaking a legal agreement:

e.g He was deep in debt and faced with forfeiture of his property"

I have used this for parking tickets on more than 20 occasions with success every time, does it apply in this case?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes they can apply to the courts as you put your house up for security dont need a Judgement vant help other wise I would put in a holding defence or ask the otherside for more time but you need to get there agreement or your defence in by 4pm tomorrow

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Just a quick update for those who have subscribed to this thread.

I put in a defence to the claim and Lloyds solicitors applied to have my defence struck out! I out is a defence to this application on the basis that it breached my Human Rights Article 6 and it will come as no surprise this defence was also struck out!

At the hearing the judge stated several times “I must confess to having not yet read the statements” so let me make this clear, he did not read the statements but decided to strike them out anyway!

So we have applied for my wife to join the defence and she has a very good defence under the Royal Bank of Scotland v Etridge case.

The house is now negative equity and has been valued by 3 estate agents in the past 2 weeks and we have an average of £15,000 negative.

However, Lloyds still want to progress with the application or rather their solicitors do, well he would he is getting paid regardless of the outcome.

Does anyone know of any rules / law that would stop them in this situation? It can’t possibly be right that they can just kick us out of our house when there will be no financial gain to them.

Thanks for your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...