Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Checking hi-tech with low tech - Wales leading the way Growing Mid Wales, an organisation set up to bring together the private and public sectors alongside the Welsh Government, has launched a mobile mapping project to track areas of poor mobile phone signal Powys and Ceredigion. They will be using bin lorries which have signal detection equipment installed, and thus able to create a comprehensive map of mobile 'not-spots' in the area, since those vehicles will be visiting just about every property in the area on their usual rounds. Just a moment... WWW.THINKBROADBAND.COM  
    • Hi there   thank you for the reply. No, it's not a silly question at all. I am convinced I didn't hit anything with my car. I was going very slowly and it was the guy standing next to his lorry in the road who punched and kicked my car as I went by. It's cause I saw him do it in the mirror.  I initially thought he did it because he thought I was passing him maybe too closely whilst he was messing around with his lorry ?  That's why I stopped and got out and asked what he thought he was doing hitting my car. He then just hurled abuse at me. Not making any accusations such 'you hit me' 'you hit my lorry' or you did this or that. He just swore and shouted at me. At which point I said I would be making a complaint to his company for his threatening behaviour and vandalism for punching my car. I went to my car , got my phone to take a photo of his number plate but then he came towards me again and I thought if he now hits me I am going to come second. I am a woman in her mid 50s travelling on her own and this guy looked like a Millwall football supporter (short, rotund, skin head) so I decided to leave this situation. I got back in my car closed the door and drove off before he could reach me.  I later checked my phone and noticed the photo was too blurred, as I turned and rushed back to my car too quickly before the camera could focus. So I thought it was pointless making a complaint as the guy couldn't be traced anyway, so I forgot all about it until yesterday. But this is all I can think of, it must have to do with this incident as it is in the same street.   
    • Please read the following thread very carefully. It is extremely relevant where you are suing Evri on the basis of a contract which you originally made with Packlink who are domiciled in Spain. A judgement has been obtained and we have applied for transcript and it will be put up on this thread as soon as we receive it probably about the end of July. In the meanwhile, read this thread, see what has been discovered about the Packlink/Evri/customer relationship and look at the witness statement very carefully. It's a long thread but don't give up. Once you have the transcript of the judgement, then I will do a more careful and explanatory post here   https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/459707-evri-lost-my-ebay-parcel-£844-court-claim-issued-judgment/
    • So if the breach occurred say Dec 2017 (first missed payment) and the default notice was issued Sept 2018 and the claim was issued 7th June 24 the claimant will of course be arguing it is within the limitation period (by 3 months)
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Lloyds Business loan secured, help needed please


Lloyds Defender
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5595 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Firstly,

 

The wife should have sought independent legal advice; the same solicitor should not have advised both parties.

 

The bank can postpone its first charge, but still remain on the deeds.

 

Yes we have been told this but they don't seam to care about little points like that.

 

I don't understand your second point, the bank don't have a first charge the building sociaty do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gizmo, what is an ERC?

 

Early Redemption Charge - it is a charge you may have for paying off your mortgage before a certain time - sometimes known as a tie-in period. If you have one then it will bring the cost of the selling higher and make the net equity less.

 

I know professional advice is expensive - but you need some to be sure you are doing the right thing - I am not qualified in insolvency.

 

Let us know what the IP's say.

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Early Redemption Charge - it is a charge you may have for paying off your mortgage before a certain time - sometimes known as a tie-in period. If you have one then it will bring the cost of the selling higher and make the net equity less.

 

I know professional advice is expensive - but you need some to be sure you are doing the right thing - I am not qualified in insolvency.

 

Let us know what the IP's say.

 

No there is no redemption charge.

 

IP's said "get a Solicitor".

 

Round we go.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as I am aware the liqidator of your bankruptcy will negotiate a sale price of your half to your wife can she rais between £8 to £13 grand I think that all that will happen is ammber will agree for the deeds to go in her name there is no sale envolved can I sugest you make enquires with the Law socierty for a firm near you who specalise in insolvency

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you are going to have bite he bullet and book an appointment with a solicitor.

Is there any possibility of your wife raising the amount needed over the next 12 months?

What stage are Lloyds at with the possession order?

I suggest you post the question over here as well.

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you are going to have bite he bullet and book an appointment with a solicitor.

Is there any possibility of your wife raising the amount needed over the next 12 months?

What stage are Lloyds at with the possession order?

I suggest you post the question over here as well.

 

She could borrow the money from her parents.

 

Lloyds are at the application stage, I have to file a defence by Thursday.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They have filed an application for possession of the house only, they have only named me as the defendant and they have not yet filed an application for judgement of the debt, they have filed an application for judgment of the debt from my business partner and now an application for possession of his house.

Gizmo referred me to the fool forum and someone has raised this as a potential stopper. I am trying to find out if they can make an application for possession when they don’t have a judgment to back it up.

However, I don’t know if this is relevant but the security is a “Mortgage of freehold or leasehold property to secure own liabilities”. Does anyone know if this security can be used to secure our Limited companies liabilities?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just looking through the agreements again and found this:

 

3.4 Unless I / we agree otherwise with the bank, this Mortgage shall not secure any liabilities regulated by Part V of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

I have just had a look at Part V Consumer Credit Act 1974 and unless I mistaken it looks like I am protected.

 

Does anyone else think so?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another thought, or am I clutching at straws!

 

Does the Bill of Rights Act 1689 apply in this case? where it says

 

That all grants and promises of fines and forfeitures of particular persons before conviction are illegal and void;

 

The Cambridge Dictionary says that a forfeiture is "the loss of rights, property or money, especially as a result of breaking a legal agreement:

e.g He was deep in debt and faced with forfeiture of his property"

I have used this for parking tickets on more than 20 occasions with success every time, does it apply in this case?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes they can apply to the courts as you put your house up for security dont need a Judgement vant help other wise I would put in a holding defence or ask the otherside for more time but you need to get there agreement or your defence in by 4pm tomorrow

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Just a quick update for those who have subscribed to this thread.

I put in a defence to the claim and Lloyds solicitors applied to have my defence struck out! I out is a defence to this application on the basis that it breached my Human Rights Article 6 and it will come as no surprise this defence was also struck out!

At the hearing the judge stated several times “I must confess to having not yet read the statements” so let me make this clear, he did not read the statements but decided to strike them out anyway!

So we have applied for my wife to join the defence and she has a very good defence under the Royal Bank of Scotland v Etridge case.

The house is now negative equity and has been valued by 3 estate agents in the past 2 weeks and we have an average of £15,000 negative.

However, Lloyds still want to progress with the application or rather their solicitors do, well he would he is getting paid regardless of the outcome.

Does anyone know of any rules / law that would stop them in this situation? It can’t possibly be right that they can just kick us out of our house when there will be no financial gain to them.

Thanks for your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...