Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • @BankFodder sorry for the delay and thank you for the lengthy reply. Yes, I agree. It's a small business and the guy is very very decent. I know someone else said my priority shouldn't be worrying whether he gets shafted but I'm not here to try and screw him over because I feel like if someone behaves decently and gets exploited, they might not behave so kindly in the future. I know DX mentioned he thinks I've caused the issue by leaving multiple instructions, but I have already explained why and both instructions were to leave it with a neighbour and there was nothing advising the driver to abandon the parcel on my doorstep. I don't think leaving it there could be considered a safe place.  I am still waiting on the retailer to respond. Ultimately, I wanted to know how he would proceed if DPD's response isn't favourable. I am certainly not looking to cause any problems. I just want my laptop. I will read the other posts for sure. I've been a bit preoccupied with family stuff. I have nothing in writing from DPD as I phoned them, but they did advise it should be the retailer that liaises with them. I tried contacting the driver straight after deliver via Whatsapp, as that's an option, but it said I couldn't send him a message and I have kept that log. We all know who took the parcel on our street, because that person has a history of parcel theft, but I don't have a doorbell camera or cctv. Police are refusing to intervene, despite the fact that I, along with several other people, spotted another's neighbour's parcel in said "suspect's" car and confronted her to get the parcel back. If the police had acted sooner, I might have had a better chance of getting the parcel back, but I suspect the laptop has long been sold on.  When the retailer responds, I will send him the link to this thread. Hopefully, he will benefit from the information on here as well.
    • @dx100uk none of the instructions advised them to leave the parcel on my door step and without such instructions., I'm struggling to see why they think it's ok to just dump it there.
    • I have checked. No recording was triggered by the camera - I don't have loop recording, only proximity and vibration sensor triggered recording - abs and since he took photos from afar and did not physically touch my car - no recording was done. 
    • He also useing he girlfriend to phone and mesage people as well
    • No TIC sheet with journeys history as I can see within the letter pack. Should there be one? Maybe they didn't look into it thoroughly?  No other pleading letter, only the one from above.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

How Risky Really Is a Vaginal Breech Birth as apposed to a C-section???


NaciravBanks
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5719 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

As the title suggests, I am trying to evaluate the real risk to having breech birth as I really want to avoid a c-sec. If anybody wishes to share there experiences with me, I would really appreciate it. Advice, links general info would be gratefully received.

I have read that at 32 weeks only 17% of babies are in breech, and this improves to 3% (if I remember correctly). Is that true?

Kind Regards

Nac

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you got reason to believe you might have a breech birth? They normally turn as delivery approaches. Breech birth

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Depends on the individual patient, I would think. If it's any consolation, my mother has 6 children, he fifth, my brother came out bottom first with SVB and she was fine, he was fine. My DD2 turned about a fortnight before I gave birth SVD (and hasn't stopped being awkward since!) again, both mum and baby were well. All I can say from my experience was that the labour was more painful than first time around, and also more speedy but I doubt that had anything to do with her position as a woman in the post natal ward I befriended, also having just given SVD birth to her second child, felt the same about her labour.

 

As I said, risk depends on the individual person, their history etc. It may be worth a chat with your consultant if you are overly concerned. In this day and age it is possible to go through a "trial of labour" which basically means you go into labour (usually, but not always, induced), and they will monitor you more closely with preperations in place in the case that an emergency section may be necessary. If the labour progresses in a manner that is considered safe for mother and baby, it will be allowed to continue. If immediate risk becomes evident during the process, they will section you. My friend had a trial of labour as it was her first pregnancy and she was expecting twins. She got to 9cm dilation but had complications and needed to have a section in the end. Trials of labour though may be a post code lottery, or agaon dependant on risk. If your consultant feels that a breech birth would place you or your baby in immediate danger due to your specific case criteria, he may encourage you to undergo a section.

 

HTH

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and thanks for the responses (sry about delay)

Yes, the reasons are as follows.

I am currently 31 weeks and a scan last week revealed that the child is in a breech position. I am hopeful that the little miracle will present himself head-down by the time I go into labour.

 

Also, and excuse me for not remembering the correct terminology that should be used, but the scanning guy (sonarologist maybe) has discovered, and is monitoring 2 things;

 

1) The baby is “growing to big”

2) There is too much fluid surrounding my baby.

 

I understand that diabetes during pregnancy can be a cause for the issues above and I accordingly had a glucose tolerance test done on the 26th august (28-weeks). Waited 2 weeks for the results and received nothing, when I called I was told that if something negative had come from the blood test, I would have been called.

 

Went back for a scan on the 11th September when the scanny guy noticed no blood results back. He advised I walk over to antenatal to chase it up which is what I did. Nothing. They couldn’t find it on the system at all at which point I suggested coming in in the morning to have another sample taken, which is what happened.

 

Received a call from the lovely midwifes yesterday (31-weeks) informing me that the blood results are back showing that I have gestational diabetes and that I should come in asap. I did, went in yesterday where I was shown how to monitor my blood and eat correctly. I was also told to go to my GP to get a prescription for the needles that the machine uses as they can only provide the strips.

 

Once at the GP reception, I was told that neither they nor the pharmacy have any reference to the needles my particular machine requires, but the pharmacy have kindly agreed to supply me a machine of there own with a supply of strips/needles. Perfect!

 

Once at home, I proceeded to monitor my blood sugar levels and am sticking to a strict diet. But there is 1 problem. The 2 machines I have are giving off different readings! I am using the correct strips with the correct machine but the one I got from the hospital always shows1 or 2 higher then the machine I got from the pharmacy! Which one do I use? I would love to hear you opinions. Also is it normal to have a glucose tolerance test so late into the pregnancy?

 

Thanks Folks

 

Nac

Edited by NaciravBanks
Link to post
Share on other sites

My suggestion would be that you contact the midwife for advice on this. Also, it seems very early days to be worrying about a breech birth as the head tends to engage much nearer the time that the baby is due to be born.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...