Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Daft question - but you filed the defence on-line on MCOL as dx indicated, right?
    • We looked up the e-mail address so communications would be in writing.  If you do stuff on the phone the other party can just deny the contents of the conversation.  They can't deny what's written in an e-mail. So time to sort Pete out.  Check the following for accuracy and change anything I've got wrong.  Then e-mail Pete this evening.  I was thinking of threatening the pub with legal action but let's initially be nice.   Dear Pete, Re: PCN no.XXXXX, claim form no.XXXXX on 23 July 2022 I was a customer at your pub and I attach proof of purchase. I was picking up my cousin Ms XXXXX and her family as she was working as a cook with you at the time.  I entered the pub through the back door, went to the bar, and ordered a drink and a meal.  At no point did any bar staff alert me that I needed to add my registration number or did I see any signs advising me to do so.  I then took a seat outside in a small seated area so I could chat to my cousin while waiting for her to finish work.  We were joined by the management of the pub and bar staff during my time waiting  I was shocked a few days later when I received a demand for £100 from Civil Enforcement Ltd.  i contacted the pub and was told "don't worry, it's not enforceable". Well, that information turned out to be nonsense because I have now received a county court claim form from CEL. I contacted the pub again on XXXXX and was extremely disappointed to be told "there's nothing we can do". Of course there is something you can do.  You are the organ grinder.  You called CEL in.  You can call your dogs off.  Your pub has absolutely superb reviews on Google Maps regarding the way in which you treat guests.  Do you really think customers should be dragged to court?  I'm sure you don't. I am therefore requesting that you intervene and instruct CEL to cease court action. Yours, XXXXX
    • Thank you - Defence has now been filed Doc_20240501_182920_Redacted.pdf
    • The US central bank has left interest rates unchanged again, noting a "lack of further progress" toward lowering inflation.View the full article
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

CCa 1974 and credit cards


jayjay11
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4957 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

No prescribed terms – no signature of creditor – ineligible but they might still have the original which would negate that point.

Unenforceable in my opinion but maybe someone more knowledgeable can confirm.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 261
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I can’t see a signature of the creditor or a place on the agreement where one would go which makes it improperly executed and therefore unenforceable. The t&c’s and prescribed terms may be relevant if the original document is two sided but if it’s two separate sheets then nothing ties one sheet to the other.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it’s improperly executed others may not so you might want to wait for a second opinion.

Only you can decide what you want to do from here and it depends on what you are trying to achieve with the creditor. If I believe that I have been sent an unenforceable agreement I stop payments and let them know the reason why – if they want to take me to court to enforce the debt then that’s up to them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Write to them and tell them that the copy they have sent in response to your request is illegible and you therefore require them to copy the original document and send the copy to you. You really need to establish if they can produce the original agreement in court because the one they have sent isn’t really readable.

Again this is only my opinion but I think a judge would have great difficulty enforcing the agreement on the basis of what’s been sent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Consumer Credit Act states -

61. (1) A regulated agreement is not properly executed unless

(a) a document in the prescribed form itself containing all the prescribed terms and conforming to regulations under section 60(1) is signed in the prescribed manner both by the debtor or hirer and by or on behalf of the creditor or owner, and

Then it states –

Consequences of improper execution.

65 (1) An improperly-executed regulated agreement is enforceable against the debtor or hirer on an order of the court only.

So in your case it would be up to a judge to make a ruling on whether the agreement was enforceable. It would have to be readable for a start.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They have actually responded to your request but if you can’t read the agreement then I would write to them to say that you are not satisfied with their response to your request. I would also tell them that you are putting the account in dispute until such time as they send you a legible copy.

They might send you a better copy or they might not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Jay – its fine but they know (and choose to ignore) their responsibilities under the act. Try something short and sweet like this -

Account Number xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Dear sir/madam:

Thank you for your reply to my request for a true copy of any alleged credit agreement regarding the above account. Unfortunately the copy you have sent is of a poor quality and illegible and therefore does not comply with my request.

This account will remain in dispute until such time as you supply me with a legible copy.

Yours faithfully,

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Are you looking for judgement under s142 – I think it will cost you to do this and if they have the original you might be in trouble.

Why don’t you send them another letter asking them to make the original copy available for inspection at your local branch.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No – but try this –

Dear Sir/Madam

Account Number xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

I wrote to you recently regarding the poor quality of the documents you have sent in response to my request for information under section 78 (1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. To ensure that this doesn’t happen again might I suggest that you arrange for the original document to be made available for inspection by me in person at my local branch.

Please advise me at your earliest convenience where and when the document will be available for inspection.

Yours faithfully,

Print don’t sign.

There should be no reason why they cannot comply unless of course they don’t have the original.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

It’s difficult to offer any more advice other than has already been offered. A lot depends on how far you personally want to go with it – if they tried to enforce this agreement in court would you be happy to defend? If it went to court and you lost could you live with the ccj?

Do they have the original? Asking them to produce it was a way of finding out but they haven’t played ball and you’re none the wiser. Will they need the original in court? That’s the big question really – can you see a judge ruling that the copy you have is good enough to enforce the debt? I can’t but then I’m not a judge.

I think lots of people are in the same situation as you – some decide to stop paying and wait for the next step – others decide to offer a token payment. I don’t think anyone can tell you what to do now but they will help you get through it if it goes to court.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

They should reply by sending you a copy of any document that contains your personal information – so in the case of your credit agreement you want to see a copy of the front and back (it’s best to stipulate this in your request) – as underdog13 said in an earlier post, the back of your agreement (application) can’t be as they claim because it says bank copy.

Let’s see what they send and then take it from there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...