Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well, that's it then. Clear proof of the rubbish cameras. Clear proof of double dipping. G24 won't be getting a penny. Belt & braces, I would write to the address LFI has found, include the evidence of double dipping, and ask Fraser Group to call their dogs off.
    • LOL. after sending Perch capital a CCA request with a stapled £1 PO attached (x2) Their lapdog Legal team TM Legal have sent me two letters today saying "due to a recent payment on the account, your account is open to legal/enforcement action" so i guess they have tried to apply that payment to the account to run the statue bar along. dirty tactics lol.
    • I have initiated the breathing space so ill wait. from re reading everything this what i understand BS gives me 60 days break from the creditors during these 60 days they may contact me and will most likely default I need to wait until after a default notice to see whether the OC will keep the debt or sell it off If kept by the OC then i should attempt a plan or pay some token payment? If sold to DCA then don't pay and after 6 years it will leave my credit report once the DN is registered with a date. DCA may start a CCJ but unlikely, if they do come back here. last question, do you know roughly how long this will all take? in terms of defaults/default notice, potential CCJ? Would you say I have 12 months plus from when the BS ends?
    • Well, it's up to you. Years & years & years ago the forum used to suggest appealing to POPLA, but then AFAIK POPLA's remit was changed and it became much more biased in favour of the PPCs. One of the problems with taking that route is that the onus will fall on you to prove your appeal, while if you do nothing the onus is on MET to start legal action which experience teaches they are very, very reluctant to do. If you go down the POPLA route I would think your ace would be insufficient signage.  Are you able to go back there and get photos of their rubbish, entrapping signs?
    • The first clearly visible sign as you pull in to the car park states “McDonald’s Customers Only 60 minutes” The next clearly visible sign is an almost identical sign outside Starbucks which states “60 minutes free stay for customers only” There are other signs towards the rear of the car park (away from the outlets) that have the terms and conditions on them in very small print.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CM V Abbey - Financial Hardship


c-m
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5716 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I put a claim in against abbey last year, however like everyone else my claim is on a stay.

 

Before my action of requesting bank charges I had an agreed overdraft with abbey. Abbey's charges saw me go over this overdraft limit. When I requested the money back and threatened court action they closed my account and had debt collectors chase me for the £1500.

 

My claim was originally for £950, £370 of which abbey paid back into the closed account as a gesture of good will. I continued to chase for the rest and eventually my claim was stayed.

 

I am currently experiencing financial hardship in that I am now unemployed.

 

Is it worth notifying abbey of the financial hardship or if i win will they just pay the money to themselves and come chasing me again for rest?

 

Also Abbey placed a default notice against my name that I want lifted.

 

What are your opinions?

Link to post
Share on other sites

This has also happened to me with single account and joint account with hubby which resulted in all sorts of financial problems, mine too on hold but i have read today that you have to write to them first and tell them you intened to submit court papers on the special rules - hardship, i can go back the whole 6yrs and have necessary proof - do you have all documents as it said would need these, it was not on here were i read it but i'm in process of looking, sorry cant be more help at this stage,

 

good luck

jcl

Link to post
Share on other sites

Still haven't done anything on this as i'm unsure of what action to take.

 

As I said I owe Abbey £1500 since they closed my overdraft. They currently owe me £580 in charges.

 

If I persue the claim is it likely that they will just keep the £580 and take from the money I owe them?

 

Of course if it wasn't for the bank charges I would still have my overdraft facility and so wouldn't owe them that sum.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi CM

 

I note that you have a financial hardship case and want to progress it further and that you claim has been stayed in court.

 

I have just been sucessful in getting Abbey to agree to repay me 65% of my claim which has been stayed in court and which is NOT in full and final and after the test case if the OFT win I will be able to recover the balance.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/abbey-bank/65003-ds-abbey-bank.html

 

The person to contact is Ronan Coyle, Abbey National PLC, Location Code TS6 D03, Abbey National House, 2 Triton Square, London NW1 3AN

Tel:-020 7756 4398 you will need to quote your court reference number.

 

The documents which I sent to him were:-

 

1. A brief letter fully explaining the reasons why you meet the FSA's recent update in the new waiver conditions.

2. An income and expenses sheet.

3. All documentary evidences supporting the hardship letter,

4. A revised claims schedule of charges and interest to date.

 

Should you require more help, please just ask. As not only are Abbey now agreeing hardship claims other banks are also. It is really important that you give as much information and evidence that you readliy have. My claim was dealt with within 4 weeks and I did not have to supply any further information.

 

Tuttsi xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi CM

 

I note that you have a financial hardship case and want to progress it further and that you claim has been stayed in court.

 

I have just been sucessful in getting Abbey to agree to repay me 65% of my claim which has been stayed in court and which is NOT in full and final and after the test case if the OFT win I will be able to recover the balance.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/abbey-bank/65003-ds-abbey-bank.html

 

The person to contact is Ronan Coyle, Abbey National PLC, Location Code TS6 D03, Abbey National House, 2 Triton Square, London NW1 3AN

Tel:-020 7756 4398 you will need to quote your court reference number.

 

The documents which I sent to him were:-

 

1. A brief letter fully explaining the reasons why you meet the FSA's recent update in the new waiver conditions.

2. An income and expenses sheet.

3. All documentary evidences supporting the hardship letter,

4. A revised claims schedule of charges and interest to date.

 

Should you require more help, please just ask. As not only are Abbey now agreeing hardship claims other banks are also. It is really important that you give as much information and evidence that you readliy have. My claim was dealt with within 4 weeks and I did not have to supply any further information.

 

Tuttsi xx

 

Hi thanks for that. What evidence did you provide of hardship? I am currently claiming JSA is the award letter enough? I'd rather not give them statements from my creditcard and other bank overdrafts if possible.

 

Do you have a draft letter?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do have the letter which I sent which is personal to me and my own circumstances.

 

I will however draft for you an outline for the letter which you can then add all about your own hardship details. I am at work now but will do it when I get home this evening. It is really best in these circumstances not to send stereo type letters especially if you want Abbey to consider your claim seriously.

 

JSA - Job Seekers allowance is good

 

Any other debts like mortgage/rent/council tax /telephone/gas/electric arrears or anything else which you are currently being threatened with or can show any court judgements. You will need to supply proof if you want Abbey to consider your claim. (we have a suspended possession order)

 

You need to do a joint income and expenses summary (ours by the way was in the negative but was unfortunately accurate hence why we are in the position that we are in )

 

The reasons which lead up to your current hardship,(with mine my hubby had two emergency eye ops last year which caused him to fall dramatically behind with the mortgage repayments anomgst other debts)

 

You have to make a strong case for yourself if you want to be concidered.

 

Tuttsi xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your Name

ADDRESS 1

ADDRESS 2

ADDRESS 3

ADDRESS 4

TEL/FAX XXXXXXXXX

EMAIL XXXXXXXXXX

 

FOA: Mr Ronan Coyle

Location Code TS6 D03

Abbey National PLC

Abbey National House

2 Triton Square

Regent Park

London NW1 3AN DATE…………..

 

BY RECORDED DELIVERY

Dear Mr Coyle

YOUR NAME

ABBEY ACCOUNT NUMBER:- XXXXXXXX

CLAIM NO:- XXXXXXX

I am writing to you regarding my claim and my financial hardship

situation which I understand meets the FSA’s recent update to the

complaints handling waiver and their guidelines on financial difficulty.

I would like to attach documentation in support of my hardship

case which evidences my extreme financial difficulty, as follows:-

1 : An updated spreadsheet showing my claim value as £XXXXXXX with Abbey at the present time.

2 : A Joint personal budget sheet which shows a monthly deficit of £XXX

3.

4.

5.

6.

HERE WRITE A DESCRIPTION AS TO WHY YOU FEEL YOU ARE A GENUINE HARDSHIP CASE AND THE EFFECT IT IS HAVING ON YOU/ AND YOUR FAMILY, ETC ETC….

Change these paragraphs to suit

My husband and I are currently finding it very difficult to cope during the present economic climate coupled with the real threat of losing the residential home as a result of the suspended possession order.

This financial situation is putting a terrible burden on both myself and my family, and I please ask that you reconsider my claim and my circumstances given the current waiver criteria and the banking code.

I look forward to hearing from you shortly.

Yours sincerely

xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...