Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have just read the smaller print on their signs. It says that you can pay at the end of your parking session. given that you have ten minutes grace period the 35 seconds could easily have been taken up with walking back to your car, switching on the engine and then driving out. Even in my younger days when I used to regularly exceed speed limits, I doubt I could have done that in 35 seconds even when I  had a TR5.
    • Makers of insect-based animal feed hope to be able to compete with soybeans on price.View the full article
    • Thank you for posting up the results from the sar. The PCN is not compliant with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. Under Section 9 [2][a] they are supposed to specify the parking time. the photographs show your car in motion both entering and leaving the car park thus not parking. If you have to do a Witness Statement later should they finally take you to Court you will have to continue to state that even though you stayed there for several hours in a small car park and the difference between the ANPR times and the actual parking period may only be a matter of a few minutes  nevertheless the CEL have failed to comply with the Act by failing to specify the parking period. However it looks as if your appeal revealed you were the driver the deficient PCN will not help you as the driver. I suspect that it may have been an appeal from the pub that meant that CEL offered you partly a way out  by allowing you to claim you had made an error in registering your vehicle reg. number . This enabled them to reduce the charge to £20 despite them acknowledging that you hadn't registered at all. We have not seen the signs in the car park yet so we do not what is said on them and all the signs say the same thing. It would be unusual for a pub to have  a Permit Holders Only sign which may discourage casual motorists from stopping there. But if that is the sign then as it prohibits any one who doesn't have a permit, then it cannot form a contract with motorists though it may depend on how the signs are worded.
    • Defence and Counterclaim Claim number XXX Claimant Civil Enforcement Limited Defendant XXXXXXXXXXXXX   How much of the claim do you dispute? I dispute the full amount claimed as shown on the claim form.   Do you dispute this claim because you have already paid it? No, for other reasons.   Defence 1. The Defendant is the recorded keeper of XXXXXXX  2. It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim. 4. In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5. The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer. 6. In a further abuse of the legal process the Claimant is claiming £50 legal representative's costs, even though they have no legal representative. 7. The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all. Signed I am the Defendant - I believe that the facts stated in this form are true XXXXXXXXXXX 01/05/2024   Defendant's date of birth XXXXXXXXXX   Address to which notices about this claim can be sent to you  
    • pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’.  Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time.  You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID.  You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.<<**IMPORTANT**  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?486334-CPR-31.14-Request-to-use-on-receipt-of-a-PPC-(-Private-Land-Parking-Court-Claim type your name ONLY no need to sign anything .you DO NOT await the return of paperwork. you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

BRYAN CARTER/EGG -URGENT HELP PLEASE (Allocation Questionnaire)


Troubled1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5731 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

Please forgive me for not posting in the correct place, I have spent hours trying to find where to start a post and am hoping someone will help and put this in the correct place.

 

I have 1000's £'s worth of credit card debts, which mainly built up helping my partners business. He was owed a lot of money which would have paid my credit cards off, but ended up having to wind up his company a couple of years ago which left me with all these debts as they were personally taken out in my name alone. I paid what I could and borrowed from one to pay the other and kept on top of things and made some smaller payments, until one company took a massive amount from my bank account leaving me overdrawn... all bills and payments then started to bounce from my bank account and I went down hill from there on.

 

Admittedly I was very stupid and let things go. I have never had to deal with debt and this got me so down. With other personal problems and a bereavement leaving me so depressed, I hid away from the debts which were less important at the time and have 100's of unopened letters. My bf said if I left it they would offered me a reduced settlement figure, of which a member of family offered to help me settle and divide between debtors, but this never happened. The debts just grew into 1000's more.

 

The day came when I received a claim form from the courts on behalf of Bryan Carter, acting on behalf of Egg. The court action scared the life out of me, so I googled Bryan Carter to find his tell number to see what could be done. This is when I stumbled across this amazing site. I spent days tearful reading threads upon threads, but so confused and scared to sign up. There was another in the same boat as me who had also received a claim from BC for a small amount of what was owing, so with the guidance that was given to them by Tomterm8 and pt2537 I defended the claim and have already done the following;

 

xx/06/08 Sent Bryan Carter CCA with £1

xx/06/08 Sent BC Request for information

xx/06/08 Filed my defence to the courts (amended from the forum) and included the "including the right launch to multiple actions in respect of the same cause of action etc..."

 

I received a reply from BC stating;

 

"We have requested copy documentation relating to this account from our client and will forward this to you as soon as it is to hand.

In the meantime, we confirm that we will not enter judgment in default of Defence without having given you 14 days notice"

 

Reply from the courts;

 

They acknowledge receipt of my defence and a copy is being served on the claimant (or the claimant's solicitor) They finish saying "Where he wishes to proceed, the claimant must contact the court within 29 days after receiving a copy of your defence. After that period has elapsed, the claim will be stayed. The only action the claimant can then take will be to apply to a judge for an order lifting the stay"

 

 

I have received nothing further until I received an Allocation questionnaire from the courts, where this has been transferred to my local court. I am due to have the questionnaire returned to the courts today but have been so worried I have left this until the last minute.

 

I have a letter ready to send today to BC which I picked up on this board;

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

ACCOUNT IN DISPUTE

 

I refer to my letters dated XX/06/2008 which was delivered via special delivery to your offices on XX/06/08 and my follow up letter dated XX/06/2008.

 

In my letter on the XX/06/2008 I made a formal request for a copy of the signed, executed credit agreement for the above account under section 78(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. In addition a statement of my account should have been sent along with any other document mentioned in the credit agreement.

 

The Consumer Credit Act allows 12 working days for this request to be carried out before your company enter into a default situation. If the request is not satisfied after a further 30 calendar days, Your company commit an offence. These time limits expired on XX/06/2008 and XX/07/2008 respectively.

 

As you are no doubt aware subsection (6) states:

 

If the creditor under an agreement fails to comply with subsection (1)—

 

(a) He is not entitled, while the default continues, to enforce the agreement; and

(b) If the default continues for one month he commits an offence.

 

Therefore as at XX/07/2008 this account became unenforceable at law and it is now my intention to refer this matter to the enforcement authorities.

 

Any default notices or adverse comments your company have recorded on my credit reference file should be immediately removed.

 

It is also my belief that your continued pursuance of this matter also constitutes an

offence under Section 40 of the Administration of Justice Act 1970.

 

Failure to respond favourably to this letter within seven (7) days of receipt will result in immediate litigation being commenced against your company without further notice.

 

I would appreciate your due diligence in this matter.

 

I await your rapid response.

 

Yours faithfully

 

On filing out the court questionnaire, can someone please kindly help me as to what to write in 'G' other information. Should I just be sending a copy of all letters that I have sent to BC or should I be making a further statement here also regarding him not waiving the right to bring me back to court for the remainder of the debt? I really am stuck now. Should this have gone so far and will this end up in court?

 

I would be so grateful for any help and also correcting my post to the right place... as long as I can find it.

 

I know from reading the forums that I need to start a new post for each issue, and would like some guidance how to do this. This forum has already given me some strength and with all the help from these amazing peoples stories who have taken control of their lives, I know I must too... on my good days anyway!

 

Thank you very much in advance x

Edited by Troubled1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi troubled1

 

Welcome to CAG - you will find lots of help here (as you already have found out :))

 

Did BC submit their claim online (ie, does it have case number starting 8XK)?

 

From what you have said, it seems that BC have not sent anything in repsonse to your request under s78 of the CCA 1974 - is that right? You should also write and ask them for a copy of any default notice sent in relation to this claim as they have no right to commence proceedings without having sent one (s87 of the CCA 1974).

 

In section G you can suggest possible orders the court might make -

 

1. that, since no credit agreement has been produced, BC have not demonstrated that they have reasonable grounds to bring the claim and they have not complied with practice direction 16 - you therefore could ask that their claim be struck out under CPR 3.4(2)(a)and©

 

2. As an alternative, you could ask the court to order them to produce the documents you don't have - CCA and DN on the basis that you cannot properly defend their claim without them. In this case, you also ask for leave to amend your defence if and when BC supply the missing documents. Also make sure you include stuff on evidence - they must produce an original of the agreement (para 7.3 of CPR Practice Direction 16) and they must provide evidence of authenticity for any other document (eg DN - s8 of the Civil Evidence Act 1995)

Edited by steven4064
spelling and links

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Steven,

 

Thank you so much for replying, soooo good to know someone is there!:)

 

I took the questionnaire form into the courts today, attached the letters I sent to BC and also added;

 

"It is also noted that the claimant is trying to conduct this claim contrary to s35 of County Courts Act 1984 as I note the claimant has split once cause of action into two separate claims. This is unlawful as laid out in section 35 CCA 1984 and it is requested that the court strike out this case as a clear abuse of the process"

 

I came home to find a letter from BC

 

"Please find enclosed account documents, provided by our client, as requested. We hope that this clarifies matters and look forward to hearing from you with your proposals for discharge of this account"

 

I was shocked to receive them after all this time. Enclosed was my credit card agreement and my credit card statements from Egg. Should there be anything more?

 

What was really strange is that the first page from Egg was addressed to me saying "This letter is about your Egg Credit Card. It was sent to you on the XX June 2008 Dear xxxxx Please find enclosed the statements that you have requested"

 

I have not received, nor did request a copy of these statements before from egg and the dates on the bottom of each sheet is clearly printed 04/07/2008!

 

Also the last sheet says;

 

Balance brought forward £XXXX

Charge off account £XXXX

Refund of interest £XXXX CR

Closing balance £0.00

 

I do not understand why is it showing a balance of 0

 

 

Now that they have produced the agreement, do I still have any grounds for defence.

 

Thank you again Steven

Edited by Troubled1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you post the agreement here (you will need to scan it and put it on photobucket or some other photo site and then post the link here). The agreement may be OK but often they are not.

 

They should have sent a default notice - without having sent one of those they may not make a claim against you - so ask them for a copy.

 

The other thing is, are there any charges on the account - late payment charges or charges for going over the credit limit? If so, you should counterclaim for those plus interest. If they make up a substantial proportion of the debt, you may be able to get BC to back off entirely.

  • Haha 1

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also the last sheet says;

 

Balance brought forward £1,xxx.xx

Charge off account £xxx.xxCR

Refund of interest £xx.xxCR

Closing balance £0.00

 

I do not understand why is it showing a balance of 0

 

Now that they have produced the agreement, do I still have any grounds for defence.

 

Thank you again Steven

 

See thread

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/egg/150167-charge-off-account-statement.html

 

This is normal practice. Egg have written £xxx.xx off their company assets, and separately written off £xx.xx of debit interest unpaid by you (so that they do not incur tax on their alleged income which they never received and now do not expect to receive). This is purely an inhouse balancing of Egg's books of no interest to you.

 

Egg have sold an expected bad debt to BC for a fraction upfront or later, but Egg is still obliged by law to provide documentation as required.Chin up and good luck. They cannot expect blood out of a stone. Egg's owners the Citigroup are now tens of billions in the red and begging for financial help all over the world.

Edited by Mistermind

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Steven,

 

I'm going to join Photo bucket and try and scan from another pc as it does not work on mine.

 

No default notice, just statements. The only charges that seem unrefunded are 2 x £16 unpaid DD fee's and one £16 late charge fee

 

Do I just send a letter to BC confirming receipt of the CCA/statements and just ask him for a copy of any default notice? Do I need to inform the courts that I have received information from him.

 

I will be back as soon as scan is done! Thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you also Mistermind.

 

For a moment I thought they made an error and I owed zero, not one of those luck ones though. You learn something every day, but I had no idea BC had bought the debt as he is taking me to court as the 'solicitor' for Egg. I have nothing to say that he has purchased the debt. If he hasnt and Egg seem to have sort of written the debt off, at this stage would Egg still take a small payment as settlement.

 

I have another egg card which was taken out back in 2000/2001 unfortunately for a lot more money. Should I be sending them a CCA letter now, or find the company who is chasing me for the money to send it to?

Link to post
Share on other sites

For a moment I thought they made an error and I owed zero, not one of those luck ones though. You learn something every day, but I had no idea BC had bought the debt as he is taking me to court as the 'solicitor' for Egg. I have nothing to say that he has purchased the debt. If he hasnt and Egg seem to have sort of written the debt off, at this stage would Egg still take a small payment as settlement.

 

I have another egg card which was taken out back in 2000/2001 unfortunately for a lot more money. Should I be sending them a CCA letter now, or find the company who is chasing me for the money to send it to?

 

I suggest it will do you no harm to send a Private Message to the author of the thread I quoted, and see if he will discuss in private what proportion Egg would accept as a final settlement in his case. Click on the author's name and a screen will open up for your text. Do bear in mind though it is August the peak holiday season, the only ones who do not take a holiday are the debt chasers. icon10.gif

 

The general impression I get from reading is that if you send your pursuing DCA your CCA request (possibly with a copy to Egg) the DCA will forward it to Egg, and it will make a deeper impression on them than if you merely mention in passing that you have separately asked Egg for CCA. I.E. the vociferous DCA then cannot say they do not realise that non-production of CCA necessitates the hold-up of frantic dramatics.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Steven,

 

Finally got there.

 

http://i510.photobucket.com/albums/s350/photome68/CCA1.jpg

 

http://i510.photobucket.com/albums/s350/photome68/CCA2.jpg

 

I did ask BC for all the documents in my 2nd letter on 4th June (Request for information) But only received the CCA and CC statements, nothing more.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suggest it will do you no harm to send a Private Message to the author of the thread I quoted, and see if he will discuss in private what proportion Egg would accept as a final settlement in his case. Click on the author's name and a screen will open up for your text. Do bear in mind though it is August the peak holiday season, the only ones who do not take a holiday are the debt chasers. icon10.gif

 

The general impression I get from reading is that if you send your pursuing DCA your CCA request (possibly with a copy to Egg) the DCA will forward it to Egg, and it will make a deeper impression on them than if you merely mention in passing that you have separately asked Egg for CCA. I.E. the vociferous DCA then cannot say they do not realise that non-production of CCA necessitates the hold-up of frantic dramatics.

 

That's a great Idea thank you, will do this now... holidays... does nothin but rain down here:sad:

 

I started opening and organising paper work a couple of weeks ago when I first found this site, then lapsed. All help here today has woke me up from this nightmare and to start doing something about it all. I will be sending a CCA request first thing 2morrow. Sorry if I sound stupid, but do you mean send BC a CCA REQUEST and enclose a copy addressed to EGG for BC to send on, or do you mean send them both a CCA, but also send BC a copy of the one sent to EGG? I am somewhat thick at times.... mostly:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's a great Idea thank you, will do this now... holidays... does nothin but rain down here:sad:

 

I started opening and organising paper work a couple of weeks ago when I first found this site, then lapsed. All help here today has woke me up from this nightmare and to start doing something about it all. I will be sending a CCA request first thing 2morrow. Sorry if I sound stupid, but do you mean send BC a CCA REQUEST and enclose a copy addressed to EGG for BC to send on, or do you mean send them both a CCA, but also send BC a copy of the one sent to EGG? I am somewhat thick at times.... mostly:)

 

I suggest to send the CCA request addressed categorically to BC. So long as BC is the demonstrable recipient, no harm in mentioning inside the request that you are also sending a copy of said request to Egg. One swing of the tennis raquet fires the ball into two courts. If they later say the left hand did not know what the right hand was doing, you wave said document and claim the point.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

FT.com / World - Rise in credit card debt charge-offs

 

UK consumers are walking away from their credit card debts in rising numbers, according to a report to be issued on Wednesday by Standard & Poor’s, the credit agency.

 

Average charge-offs – defined as repayments of principal and interest which credit card companies no longer expect to receive – rose to 6.9 per cent by the end of June, up from 6.62 per cent at the end of March.

 

The latest rise is a reversal of the trend that had seen charge-offs falling since 2005. That was the point at which the number of borrowers seeking to dodge their debts by taking out individual voluntary arrangements peaked.

 

Debts overdue by more than 180 days are automatically classified as charge-offs, even if recoveries are made later.

 

Prashant Dwivedi, credit card securities analyst at S&P, said that the rise was all the more surprising because UK card companies had received a rude awakening three years ago as borrowers found loopholes to avoid debt repayment. Since then card companies have tightened lending criteria, raised interest rates and cut individual lines of credit to help limit losses. They imposed tougher standards long before mortgage lenders did so. Also, the performance of some credit card-backed bonds weakened as regulators cut the maximum penalties for late payments that could be charged. The two developments had put the industry on its mettle long before the credit crunch began, Mr Dwivedi said. “In a sense it was a blessing in disguise,” he said. “They got a wake-up call much earlier [than other lenders].”

 

The charge-offs are below the 7.9 per cent that prevailed at the peak of popularity for IVAs but still very much above the 3.0 to 3.5 per cent charge-offs seen when credit card-backed bonds first hit the market.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mistermind,

 

Sorry I could not get on-line the last couple of days. Thank you for all the info and links. Helped me understand a bit more.

 

I suggest it will do you no harm to send a Private Message to the author of the thread I quoted, and see if he will discuss in private what proportion Egg would accept as a final settlement in his case. Click on the author's name and a screen will open up for your text.

 

I did try this doing this on the link that you posted to Andrew1, couldnt get it to work, but I'm thinking that you may have meant Andrew1 himself (sorry, I didn't want to message him incase he wondered what I was on about?)

 

 

I'm still organising all paper work and found that the other egg debt is not through BC and the last letter I seem to have found regading this was from 'Clarity' and in November, so I have a lot more sorting to do, as these companies seem to be passing details on to another by the week.

 

Thank you again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mistermind,

 

I did try this doing this on the link that you posted to Andrew1, couldnt get it to work, but I'm thinking that you may have meant Andrew1 himself (sorry, I didn't want to message him incase he wondered what I was on about?)

 

 

I'm still organising all paper work and found that the other egg debt is not through BC and the last letter I seem to have found regading this was from 'Clarity' and in November, so I have a lot more sorting to do, as these companies seem to be passing details on to another by the week.

 

Thank you again.

 

Yes, click on the author's underlined name and a window will pop up. Then click "Send Message" in rather small print. No harm in sending a polite PM, not an uncommon occurrence. This site is all about cardholders pooling and sharing info, some of which may need to remain less public. Outstanding debts do get passed from one agency to another. If the dramatics have gone quiet for 9 months, no point in waking up the sleeping dog, but every point in preparing what to do when the dog wakes and barks, or bites.Good luck.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Vous êtes celui ! :grin:(a dû le babelfish ce qu'a signifié il)

 

maybe, but I don't actually speak French :D:D

 

Can you tell me if you have any confirmation that this debt was sold? You should have received a letter of assignment from both Egg and Bryan Carter if it was a debt purchase.

Link to post
Share on other sites

maybe, but I don't actually speak French :D:D

 

Can you tell me if you have any confirmation that this debt was sold? You should have received a letter of assignment from both Egg and Bryan Carter if it was a debt purchase.

 

Hi andrew1,

 

It just said, Yes you are the One! Had to bablefish it as I don't speak French either:-D

 

Thank you for coming back to me. From what I believe I have not had any type of confirmation that the debt has been sold. When I requested all the info from BC, all that came back was the credit agreement and also statements, nothing else. The court form says that Egg is the client and BC is the solicitor and also the person for payment and correspondence. I am still going through lots of letters, but I have not come across any letters of assignments from any of the companys I owe debts to.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Troubled1,Egg management have been known to periodically or regularly read this forum. Recently several DCA employees posted with credible detail and authentic tone the point of view from the other side. For all you know BC who chase many cardholders also read this forum.Posting your exact balances will pinpoint your case. No point letting the other side know all your battle plans. During the Falklands War GCHQ heard every telephone conversation between Argentinian commanders in Buenos Aires and Falklands. The better informed side won.You can still go back and edit some fuzziness into the precise figures in your posting -- 1K et al would be close enough. Good luck.

Edited by Mistermind
  • Haha 1

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...