Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

My Smile journey starts here


Dave J
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1895 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

8hjfofrrE4

 

I have recently sent the DPA request letter to our friends at Smile. I have received the following text in reply which on first glance is not satisfactory.

 

I acknowledge receipt of your request of the personal data held by this Bank in connection with the above numbered account. Under the Data Protection Act, this is referred to as a Subject Access Request.

 

If you have not already done so, please make your request in writing to the above address, together with a cheque value £10.00, made payable to The Co-operative Bank, which represents the fee we can charge under the Act.

 

Please note that a full Subject Access Request does not include:

 

* Information held by the credit reference agencies.

* Statements of your accounts.

* Archived customer notepads, unless specifically requested.

 

It may be that you actually only require details of specific information held on our files. If transactional information only is required, this can be provided at a reduced charge of £25. In addition, certain information can be provided free of charge and I enclose a form for your completion and return, in the prepaid envelope, should you only require limited information.

 

Firstly they obviously haven't read the letter which clearly stated my exact requirements. Furthermore, statements of my accounts are included as backed by the Durant vs FSA case.

 

Any advice how i should treat this response greatly appreciated.

 

Many Thanks

 

David

Link to post
Share on other sites

...and since when has a £25 charge been a reduction on a £10 charge???!!

Status:

 

Halifax - DPA sent 03/03/06.

Prelim Letter - Sent 27/03/06 ignored.

LBA sent 10/04/06 - Ignored

Moneyclaim filed - 26.04.06

Acknowledgement received 3rd May. Halifax state they intend to defend.

Halifax Settled in Full - 17 May 2006

 

If you've found this post helpful, I would be grateful if you could click on the 'Scales of Justice' button in the top right corner of this post.

Link to post
Share on other sites

oh damn, and there was me thinking we had a brilliant quote from a bank!! :lol::lol:

Status:

 

Halifax - DPA sent 03/03/06.

Prelim Letter - Sent 27/03/06 ignored.

LBA sent 10/04/06 - Ignored

Moneyclaim filed - 26.04.06

Acknowledgement received 3rd May. Halifax state they intend to defend.

Halifax Settled in Full - 17 May 2006

 

If you've found this post helpful, I would be grateful if you could click on the 'Scales of Justice' button in the top right corner of this post.

Link to post
Share on other sites

DaveJ

Repy to them quoting Durant that it has been held that data does include statements. Remind them that they have fiduciary duty towards you under which they are obliged to excercise utmost care in the accuracy of the statements which they make to you and that to make a false representation would be a serious breach of this duty and that if they persist that you may bring the matter to the attention of the Court as well as the Information Commissioner whene you make your complaint.

 

Remind them also that they have a contractual as well as a statutory duty to comply fully with your reasonable requests unther UK legislation - viz. the Data protection Act and this also might be brought to the attention of the court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi DaveJ / Dave,

 

Still waiting for my reply to my letter to Smile on 15th Feb! :evil:

 

Given the encouragement that once the info comes through it may be a short process, I'm going to ring them tomorrow....again....as they said they would ring me back last Wednesday when I called them then.

 

What is it they say about monkeys and Shakespear :lol:

Smile: £2,522 full payment received,

Citi Cards: £693.71 balance written off. Full value of Court claim,

West Brom Building Society: DPA request sent 15.05.06,

Capital 1: £220 claimed LBA sent 15.05.06.

Barclaycard: DPA request sent 16.05.06

Link to post
Share on other sites

Suggest you start writing reminders as per my post above.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My reply

 

I am deeply unsatisfied with the response i have received to my letter as per my request for data you hold about me. You claim that the request does not include statement information held on my accounts. I can only point you to the case of Durant v Financial Services Authority [2003] EWCA Civ 1746 in which the judge ruled that statement information does indeed fall under the act.

 

I would also like to remind you that you have a fiduciary duty towards me under which you are obliged to exercise utmost care in the accuracy of the statements you make. To make a false representation would be a serious breach of this duty and if it were to persist I may bring the matter to the attention of the courts as well as the information commissioner when i make my complaint.

 

Further to this I would like to remind you of your contractual duty as well as your statutory duty to comply fully with my reasonable requests under British legislation with regard to the data protection act and this also would be brought to attention of a court.

 

I would ask you to again look to my previous letter and provide the information as requested, as such I have enclosed the necessary £10 fee.

 

The letter is going to

 

Jenni Fairbairn

Customer Care Officer (not sure if this is a worthwhile contact but i know it has been passed to her)

 

PO Box 101

1 Balloon Street

Manchester

M60 4EP

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

They have banked my cheque but no sign of the data, still early days i guess. Coincidently i went £2 over my limit again and received a secure message (automated im sure) telling me that there is a charge. There is no sign of this on my statement though which is interesting given recent events.

 

I will update until i get my money back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi DaveJ,

 

I sent a request using the template to Smile on 16.02.06 and after receiving no data rang them on 12.03.06. The Managed Account Dept siad they would look into it and I received a secure message stating that they had received my complaint and would be looking into it.

 

I rang again, stating that my letter was not a complaint but a request for data. They stated that it was being classed as a complaint and so they only need to respond in 40 working days on the complaint. Dependent on what their view was on that, they would then have a further 40 days to comply with DPA!

 

Then got a letter on 31.03.06 stating that they had now reviewed my complaint and would be forwarding the data within 40 days.........that is 40 days 31.03.06!!!!! Have printed all secure e-mails off incase they are in breach of DPA and also to show judge of their un co-operativeness.

 

Seems they are trying to stall as much as possible but once I get the info, they'll get 14 days before I start the court action

Smile: £2,522 full payment received,

Citi Cards: £693.71 balance written off. Full value of Court claim,

West Brom Building Society: DPA request sent 15.05.06,

Capital 1: £220 claimed LBA sent 15.05.06.

Barclaycard: DPA request sent 16.05.06

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

hiya DaveJ

 

have you got any further with Smile? just wondered how you were going with them? I've just got the standard letter back saying that they will provide the information within 40 days.

 

lois

Abbey claim: £972.00; Req for Refund letter sent 22.05.06

HSBC claim: sorted!

Citibank credit card claim: sorted!

Abbey/MBNA credit card: sorted!

Smile credit card: 2nd LBA sent 09.06.06

Capital One credit card: sorted!

..........................

Parachute deployed and everything moved ... GO GET 'EM !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi i sent a secure message asking where my data was, i was told 5-7 days as the cheque was received April 15th or something.

 

They cashed the cheque in MARCH!!!!!

 

I'm not going to go down the IC route personally but i won't leave them in peace i know that for certain.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dave,

 

I'm also with Smile and am about to start the same process. Could you let me know if you used their "send Message" facility or did you deal with them in writing. I have sent them a complaining message as they charged me £20 for a day when I had previously authorised them to move money from my Hi interest Account to cover any excess on my current account. Of course they refused to do so. And they are supposed to be an ethical bank.!!

 

I look forward to hearing from you and compare notes

 

Regards NigelR

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, im waiting for my data to be sent, my cheque has cleared and the letter of acknowledgement said they would be gathering the data etc...no questions asked!!

 

Theres about 10 days left of the 40day deadline. I was just wondering what makes up the money your asking for? Are you asking for commission paid charges, daily excess charges. They do service charges but im not sure if im allowed to claim on this seen as its a service?

Good luck and I hope i can watch your case and pick up pointers on the way with my case

Jack:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok good stuff, and you just added 8% onto the total sum?

I sent a secure message today reminding them that the deadline I set is soon upon us. The just gave me the usual 40days from which they sent "there" letter.

SO i politley replied I set the deadline and then I dropped the part of going to court and am prepared to start proceedings if they fail to meet my deadline.

So il see if the tactic of making them squirm works lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jacksy the 8% is only if you are going to court, there are two different types of interest.

 

The interest I am claiming at this point (£30) is hard to work out but it is my lowest accurate estimate of what they have made in standard debit interest charges for when i have been overdrawn.

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1895 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...