Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

backdoor lowells CCJ - LLLoyds Loan - poss already SBd - set aside judgement adjourned


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5262 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I had a default judgement made against me in May 2008 by northampton CC. I was successful in having a judgement set aside and a charging order removed last October. The order was ammended by the court in february 2009 (this year) and stated as follows.

1The judgement dated 14 May 2008 be set aside

2The interim charging order dated 7 july be dismissed and the claimant do forthwith remove the land registry entries protecting the same

3The Defendant do file and serve a defence within 14 days have you filed?

4Upon the defendant complying with paragraph 3 the claim be allocated to the small laims track and allocation questionaires be dispensed with

5Standard small claims directions do apply save that the claimant do provide the defendant with copies of all evidence it seeks to rely upon at the final hearing within 21 days of recieving this notice that the claim has been allocated to the small claim track

6The costs of the hearing on 7th August and the application to set judgement aside be reserved to the final hearing.

 

I have recieved the notice of allocation to the small claims track today 10th October (dated 8th October). Could anyone help explain a couple of things. Firstly does the claimant have to provide me with copies of all evidence within 21 days from today (signed copy of original credit agreement, proof of any payments made including dates).Yes and secondly should i write to the claimant demanding that they do provide them within the specified time.Dont need to the DJ as ordered that they do if they dont strike out the claim I am also considerring writing to them and telling them that if they drop th claim then I will not put in a counter claim because I believe that they cannot provide the above documents and that without the original agreement being available then there is no contract.Hold back on that for now

Help advice very much appreciated

Thanks in advance

bradz

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 68
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

By way of the DJ order if the Claimants fail to disclose within 21 days then you have right to make application N244 for an unless order and strike out.The DJ will probally allow one last chance and failure would lead to strike out the Claimants case.

It very much sounds like they are desperate to settle so i would be shocked if they do manage to provide the relevent paperwork.

I am glad you refused their offer but in the meantime keep your eye on the dates and watch for the Claimant they may try to discontinue within the alloted 21 days.

 

Regards

 

Andy

  • Haha 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

It most certainly does,in theory yes, they may but would need recourse of the Courts permission,and very rare,better to strike it out then its dead in the water.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your replies and advice Andy, it's very much appreciated. Hopefully they won't comply within the time and I will apply for the unless order. If they did discontinue would they inform me or the court or both? Both you have the option to decline the discontinuence if you feel the strikeout is more appropiate Apologies for the what ifs, just trying to comprehend what it means and to set my mind at rest a little.

 

Wish you well

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi Bradz

 

May be worth a simple phone call to the CC dealing with your case and explain your predicament and difficulty in submitting the N244.In reality the Court could make its own decision and issue it due to your circumstances.

The alternative is to request the Unless without an hearing which would only set you back £40.00, just a thought but worth a go.

 

Best of luck

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bradz

 

Can you type up or post (less personal) the last order recieved i need to read it word for word.

 

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Bradz

 

Couple of questions:-

 

Its dated the 23rd Feb 2009

Did you submit a defence within 14 days?

The Claimant had 21 days from 23rd feb to disclose evidence it relied upon?

Nothing recieved since this order?

 

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would just draft a letter as per the Courts advise to the Case Managers explaining the above and ask them to Strike Out of its own accord.Utter nonsense

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent Bradz

 

Hopefully this will conclude this nonsense for you, I wish you all the best with the outcome.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...