Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Speaking of the reformatory boys, here they are with all of their supporters, some of whom traveled with them from miles away, all carefully crammed together and photographed to look like there were more than about 80 .. rather like Farages last rally with even fewer people crammed around what looked like an ice cream van or mobile tea bar ... Although a number in the crowd apparently thought they were at a vintage car rally as they appeared to be chanting 'crank-her'. A vintage Bentley must be out of view.   Is this all there is? Its less than the Tory candidate. - shut up and smile while they get a camera angle that looks better
    • in order for us to help you we require the following information:- Which Court have you received the claim from ? Canterbury If possible please scan redact and upload a full page copy of page 1 of the claim form. ( Name of the Claimant ? Moneybarn No 1   How many defendant's  joint or self ? One Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to. 29/05/24 Acknowledged by 14/06/24  Defence by 29/06/24  Particulars of Claim PARTICULARS OF CLAIM   1.  By a Conditional Sale Agreement in writing made on 25th August 2022. Between the Claimant and Defendant, the Claimant let to the Defendant on Conditional Sale. A Ford Ranger 3.2 TDCi (200 P S) 4x4 Wildtrack  Double Cab Pickup 3200cc (Sep.2015) Registration No, ******* Chassis number ***************** (“The Vehicle”).  A copy of the agreement is attached   2.  The price of the goods was £15,995.00.  The Initial Rental was £8500.00.  The total charge for credit was £3575.;17 And the balance of £11,070.17 was payable by 59 equal consecutive monthly instalments of £187 63. payable on the 25th of each month.   3.  The following were expressed conditions of the set agreement,   Clause 8: Our Right to End this Agreement  8.1   Subject to sending you the notice as required by law, any of the following events will entitle us to end this Agreement: 8.1.2  You fail to pay the advance payment (if any) or any of the payments as specified on the front page of this agreement or any other sum payable under this Agreement. 8.1.3 If any of the information you have given us before entering into this Agreement or during the term of this Agreement was false 8.1.4 We consider, acting reasonably, that the goods may be in jeopardy or that our rights in the goods may otherwise be prejudiced. 8.1.5 If you die 8.1.6 If a bankruptcy petition is presented against you; if you petition for your own bankruptcy, or make a live arrangement with your creditors or call a meeting of them. 8. 1.7 If in Scotland, you become insolvent or sequestration or a receiver, judicial factor or trustee to be appointed over any of your estate, or effects or suffer an arrestment, charge attachment or other diligence to be issued or levied on any of your estate or effects or suffer any exercise, or threatened exercise of landlords hype hypothec 8.1.8 If you are a partnership, you are dissolved 8.1.9 If the goods are destroyed, lost, stolen and/or treated by the insurer as a total loss in response to an insurance claim. 8.1.10 If we reasonably believe any payment made to us in respect of this Agreement is a proceed of crime. 8.1.11 If steps are taken by us to terminate any other agreement which you have entered into with us.   Clause 9.  Effect of Us Terminating Agreement   9.1 If this Agreement terminates under clause 8 the following will apply 9.1.1 Subject to the rights given to you by law, you will no longer be entitled to possession of the goods and must return them to us to an address as we may reasonably specify, (removing or commencing the removal of any cherished plates) together with a V5 registration certificate, both sets of keys and a service record book. If you are unable or unwilling to return the goods to us then we shall collect the goods and we'll charge you in accordance with clause 10.3 9.1.2 We will be entitled to immediate payment from you for all payments and all other sums do under this agreement at the date of termination 9.1.3 We will sell the goods or public sale at the earliest opportunity once the goods are in a reasonable condition which includes a return of the items listed in clause 7.1.4 9.1.4 We will be entitled to immediate payment from you of the rest of the Total Amount Payable under this agreement less: ( a) A rebate for early settlement ias required by law which will be calculated and notified to you at the time of payment (b) The proceeds of sale of the goods (if any) after deduction of all costs associated with finding you and/or the goods, recovery, refurbishment and repair. Insurance, storage, sale, agents fees, cherished plate removal, replacement keys, costs associated with obtaining service history for the goods and in relation to obtaining a duplicate V5 registration certificate   4, The following are particulars required by Civil Procedure Rules. Rule 7.9 as set out in 7.1 and 7.2 of the associated Practice Direction entitled Hire Purchase Claims:-   a)     The agreement is dated 25 August 2022. And is between Moneybarn No1 Limited  and xxxxxxxxx under agreement number 756050. b)    The claimant was one of the original parties to the agreement. c)    The agreement is regulated under the Consumer Credit Act 1974. d)    The goods claimed Ford Ranger 3.2 TDCi ( 200 PS) 4x4 Wildtrack Double Cab Pickup 3200 cc (Sep2015} Registration No ^^^^^^^ Chassis number ***************** e)     Thw total price of the goods £19570 f)     The paid up sum £1206 5 g)    The unpaid balance of the total price £7505 (to include charges) h)    A default notice was sent to the defendant on 20th February 2024 by Firrst class post i)      The date when the right to demand delivery of the goods accrued 14 March 2024 j)      The amount if any claimed as an alternative to delivery of the goods 7505 22 include charges ]= 5.  A the date of service of the notice the instalments were £562.89 in arrears. 6. By reason of the Termination of the Agreement by the notice, defendant became liable to pay the sum of £7502 7. The date of maturity the agreement is 24th August 2027. 8. Further or  alternative by reasons of  the Defendant breaches of the agreement by failing to pay the said instalments, the Defendant evinced an intention no longer to be bound by the Agreement and repudiated it by the said Notice the claimant accepted that repudiation 9. By reason of such repudiation the claimant has suffered loss and damage.   Total amount payable £19570 Less sum paid or in arrears by the date of repudiation £12064 97 Balance £7505 (to include charges.) ( The claimant will give credit if necessary for the value of the vehicle if recovered.)  The claimant therefore claims 1.    An order for delivery up of the vehicle 2.    The MoneyClaim to be adjourned generally with liberty to restore,  Upon restoration of the MoneyClaim following return or loss of the vehicle. the Claimant will ensure the pre action protocol for debt claims is followed. 3.    Pursuant to s 90 (1)  of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. An order that the Claimant and/or its agents may enter any premises in which the vehicle is situated in order to recover the vehicle should it not be returned by the Defendant 4.    further or alternatively damages 5.    costs.   Statement of truth The Claimant believes that the facts stated in these Particulars of Claim are true. The Claimant understands that the proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes or causes to be made a false statement in the document for verified by statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth. I am duly Authorised by the Claimant to sign these Particulars of Claim signed Dated 17th of April 2024   What is the total value of the claim? 7502   Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? No   Never heard of this   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? n/a Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? No   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After  Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? In a garage  Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes  Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Original Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? n/a   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? They said sent but nor received   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? None seen   Why did you cease payments? Still Paying,   What was the date of your last payment? Yesterday  31st May 2024   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? Yes on 12 Feb 2024   What you need to do now.   Can't scan, will do via another means as you cant have jpg
    • Now that is an interesting article which adds afew perspective that I hadn't thought significant - but on reflection of the perspectives offered ... Now Starmer is no Blair, however 'blairite he may be perceived, but the Tories aren't tories and aren't even remotely liberal   The fast 'unannounced and unexpected election call from sunack may well be explained by the opinion linked that he hoped reform would be unprepared and effectively call a chunk of Farages largely empty bluster - making him look even more of a prat, leave scope for attacks on shabby reform candidates and mimimise core vote losses to reform - while throwing the 'middle ground' (relative) tories TO THE DOGS - and with the added bonus of likely pacifying his missu' desire to jogg off to sunny cal tout suite somewhat   thumb in the air - I expect about 140ish tory seats, but can hope for under a hundred Reform - got to admit the outside possibility of 1, maybe 2 seats with about 8% of the vote - but unlikely. I think projections of over 10% of the vote for reform is nudged and paid for speculation - but possible with the expected massive drives from Russian, Chinese and far right social media bot and troll prods targeting the gullible.
    • Commentary June 2024 WWW.ELECTORALCALCULUS.CO.UK Interesting article about just how bad it could be for the Tories.  Also Tories could be hoping on Reform not having candidates in many seats, as they were not ready.  
    • Even a Piers Morgan is an improvement and a gutless Farage Piers Morgan calls for second Brexit referendum WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM Piers Morgan and Nigel Farage have faced off over Brexit and a second referendum in a heated reunion on BBC Question Time.   “Why don’t we have another referendum about Brexit?” he questioned. “I seem to remember when 2016 came around we were told there was going to be control of our borders and it was going to be economically beneficial to this country. And eight years later we have lost complete control of our borders… and economically it seems to have been a wilful act of self-harm.”   ... Piers missed off : after all somebody said a 48/52 decision would be "unfinished business" by a long way - was that person just bul lying (again)  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Swift Advances. Secured Loan Charges reclaim


overdone
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4946 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 3.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

 

i will try and help on this but a quick look and it looks like a first charge mortgage. the most important point for you is that you didn't sign it and were coned into agreeing to it.

 

the most important point to this is,its not just paper work errors you are looking for but how you found yourself falling pray to they're unfair practices.

 

peter Bentley v blamain springs to mind on this one.

 

wp3

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

i will try and help on this but a quick look and it looks like a first charge mortgage. the most important point for you is that you didn't sign it and were coned into agreeing to it.

 

the most important point to this is,its not just paper work errors you are looking for but how you found yourself falling pray to they're unfair practices.

 

peter Bentley v blamain springs to mind on this one.

 

wp3

 

Thank you WP3. Much appreciated.:grin: Im gonna read up on the case and hopefully understand it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I notice that it is not legally signed for on behalf of Swift First

 

 

The guy who signed.... signed it as a letter " Yours sincerely" outside the actual agreement so it ihas not been executed as of yet so they can't try to enforce it until they do.

 

sparkie

Link to post
Share on other sites

I notice that it is not legally signed for on behalf of Swift First

 

 

The guy who signed.... signed it as a letter " Yours sincerely" outside the actual agreement so it ihas not been executed as of yet so they can't try to enforce it until they do.

 

sparkie

 

which bit?:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I notice that it is not legally signed for on behalf of Swift First

 

 

The guy who signed.... signed it as a letter " Yours sincerely" outside the actual agreement so it ihas not been executed as of yet so they can't try to enforce it until they do.

 

sparkie

 

Sorry - got it. Having a dumb dumb moment.:oops:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am in a dilemma

I got into mortgage arrears with my buy to let mortgages with both Paragon & CHL, they did not try to make any arrangements with me to pay the arrears. They have appointed receivers and are seeking possession of the property. I have since paid all the arresrs in full but the banks are still pursueing possession proceddings againts the tenants. What can I do to get the properties back and away from receivers. There is also a planning matter that I am trying to resolve which will involve makinng an planning application. The banks have said that they may review the account but only in exceptional circumstances are they likely to return the property to me what does this mean

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't answer your specific question, but I've been trying to find out about LPA receivers and have just found this which may offer some help.

 

Ch 69: Law of Property Act Receivers (March 2001)

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry - got it. Having a dumb dumb moment.:oops:

 

Here's the other docs:

 

 

 

http://s836.photobucket.com/albums/zz288/busterg_2010/?action=view&current=Welcomeletter010-1.jpg" http://s836.photobucket.com/albums/zz288/busterg_2010/?action=view&current=FAxbetwwenSiftBroker011.jpg"

 

wlecome letter & Fax between swift and broker. Ive got one redemption info between broker and 1st Charge and repayment details for the second one. Just waiting on a couple more docs from each of them and I'll post them as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi sparkie, I have been reading the story Credit Today online very closely and have been trying to compare any similarities to my own case and have I think found one.

 

In Bentley's story it reads:

 

"Bentley’s lawyers, Consumer Credit Litigation Solicitors (CCLS), successfully argued that Blemain had loaned the money to Bentley irresponsibly and that the agreement took advantage of his desperate situation."

 

Bentley's solicitors used the meaning Unfair Relationship under Section 140A of the Consumer Credit Act (CCA) 1974 to claim that his loan contract with Blemain Finance was an unfair one. I believe that I too could use this term that Bentley used also.

 

Bentley's troubles started when his mother died, and he had to cut his working hours to start looking after his sick father, therefore he had to reduce his hours of work. It was decided that Blemain loaned Bentley the money irresponsibly even though Bentley was working at the time. Now what would it be decided if my case was put forward if I was to use the unfair relationship and irresponsible argument.

 

When I received my subject access request from my broker Ocean Finance there was a record of a phone calls log in there and these are the notes written about me and my OH when we were applying:

 

"NO INCOME APART FROM MR S/E EARNINGS, TO SOURCE"

 

" MORTGAGE CURRENTLY IN ARRANGEMENT, DEFAULTS AND POOR PAYMENT PROFILE"

 

"WILL OFFER 3 MONTHS PAYMENT HOLIDAY TO LET THEM GET BACK ON THEIR FEET AS CURRENTLY UNDERPAYING ON MORTGAGE"

 

So not only were Blemain aware that I was not working, but they were also aware that me and OH had a poor payment history and defaults. They loaned us the money regardless of this. They allowed us three months payment holiday, but still I strongly believe that they loaned us this money irresponsibly, and they should be held accountable for their actions the same as they believe that we are.

 

I have raised this point to my solicitor who did not seem to believe that he could use this argument successfully, so I wrote a letter of complaint to his firm over a week ago and told them that I was not very pleased about the way they were handling and representing my case. I received an email from my solicitor on the 19th Feb 10 which he advised me that his supervisor was looking in to my complaint and would be in touch. I told my solicitor that he should be looking in to all aspects of my compliant and loan agreement and not just concentrate on the secret commission.

 

Lets see what they come back, knowing my luck they will just write back and say that sorry Mrs xxxx we can no longer represent you and therefore have closed your file. If they do write this to me I will want to know the exact reason in writing as to why they believe my case will not succeed. That's if they write this, I'm just seeing what the worst case scenario will be.

 

Anyways that enough ranting for me 1st thing in the morning.:D. Sparkie has given me a lot of information which I have bombarded my solicitor with, he has been incredible in explaining everything down to a T.

 

Thanks sparkie for everything, your a star!

Link to post
Share on other sites

..and that Frettful is a perfect and excellent example of someone reading these threads on CAG, picking up on what is written, researching for themselves and finding the relevancies to their own circumstances.

 

By doing that you are now in a position of empowerment. It might not appear you are knowledgeable, but don't you feel a lot more confident in your arguments now? - doesn't it make you feel " hey, that's exactly the same as me?" you then go back to your solicitor and tell them where to begin their work and why you have a case. And you'll win!

 

Solicitors have so much legislation to consider and unless they are given the lead many are just not as experienced as we expect them to be or as thorough initially as a cagger in digging. This is where we all, with all our limited knowledge have the advantage - we can afford the time to do the legwork and that's what we have to do. It's also the reason those people who expect others to do the legwork for them rarely get far because they don't understand thier own cases well enough to sell their cases to a solicitor like you have done. Brilliant work and full marks to you for your efforts. ;) Oh, and that bloke Sparkie - ? a Star? mmmm? :grin:

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

..and that Frettful is a perfect and excellent example of someone reading these threads on CAG, picking up on what is written, researching for themselves and finding the relevancies to their own circumstances.

 

By doing that you are now in a position of empowerment. It might not appear you are knowledgeable, but don't you feel a lot more confident in your arguments now? - doesn't it make you feel " hey, that's exactly the same as me?" you then go back to your solicitor and tell them where to begin their work and why you have a case. And you'll win!

 

Solicitors have so much legislation to consider and unless they are given the lead many are just not as experienced as we expect them to be or as thorough initially as a cagger in digging. This is where we all, with all our limited knowledge have the advantage - we can afford the time to do the legwork and that's what we have to do. It's also the reason those people who expect others to do the legwork for them rarely get far because they don't understand thier own cases well enough to sell their cases to a solicitor like you have done. Brilliant work and full marks to you for your efforts. ;) Oh, and that bloke Sparkie - ? a Star? mmmm? :grin:

 

Thanks smarterchick, you are correct I do feel much more confident about my case. I do not know what the end result will be but since meeting sparkie and seeing what advice and help he has been giving so many, has open my mind to a whole new world.

I have learned so much through him, I have been doing a lot of research my also, and I have made this one of my hobbies now, studying, researching finding out things that I never thought I could. If it was not for sparkie I never would have got this far, I owe him a lot of gratitude and wish him all the luck in the world, because he so much deserves to have things go his way.

 

I have written a letter to my solicitor and would like him to sit up and take notice of what I am saying. Nowadays the onl;y way you get anywhere is by banging on a few tables , and a few heads a long the way.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks smarterchick, you are correct I do feel much more confident about my case. I do not know what the end result will be but since meeting sparkie and seeing what advice and help he has been giving so many, has open my mind to a whole new world.

I have learned so much through him, I have been doing a lot of research my also, and I have made this one of my hobbies now, studying, researching finding out things that I never thought I could. If it was not for sparkie I never would have got this far, I owe him a lot of gratitude and wish him all the luck in the world, because he so much deserves to have things go his way.

 

I have written a letter to my solicitor and would like him to sit up and take notice of what I am saying. Nowadays the onl;y way you get anywhere is by banging on a few tables , and a few heads a long the way.

 

Well done fretful38. That really helps. Thanks:D

 

I've started "chunking out" my case with the information on the thread. It's been really hard tyring to understand it all but I think Im getting there with everyone's help. Some stuff is still a little hazy but I think it's becasue I'm not to well and struggling to concentrate.

 

I think we are in a similar situation Non regulated CCA 1st Charge Mortgage. Can you confirm? I think it would be useful if you and I could exchange information. What do you think?

 

im having a similar prob with my sols. They are fixated on secret commsion and repayments/charges. Its like pulling teeth trying to get them to take on board and look at into other aspects that im raising thanks to the information and experiences everyone has detailed on this thread.

 

Well I had a moment of empowerment myself yesterday. I rang the FSA to find out what category I fall into re: Non CCA or CCA. They said it would seem I was under them but the reason behind the loan from Swift would indicate I could also fall into the OFT. They said I had to figure it out with Seift as to which one I was. Not impressed and in all homest and in my opinion not worth a carrot.

 

So, I contacted Trading Standards who I complained to last year and demanding I get a call back as I haven't heard from them. Explained what I believe to be the underhand pracices of Swift as I did last and gave them the doucmentation for.

 

I got a call back to say they had spoken to David Blocksidge earlier in the day following my call and they are comingto see me Monday:grin: They need detailed information/reason as to how I believe this falls could fall into OFT domain and regulate this agreement. There gonna take copies of everything I have and get back to the OFT and see what they can do. So anything you think might help, please let ne know.

 

As soon as I've managed to chunk out the information and categorise it - bit hard going, I'll get that over to you in the hope it can help. I also keep you posted on what comes of Trading Standards and OFT.

 

Also, I was told by Swift that a £10 charge for each bit of information would be needed ie per phone call. I contacted the information commision and they advised get it all in one request with one fee of £10.00 for the lot. So going to be asking for a lot of docs/calls which I believe will prove I've been taken for a ride.

 

Im going to try and set up a moodle at some point so we can access the docs and info in a catogrised way. I found trying to cope with it all and manage the information a really difficult task. It's not to bad when you can think but this shower don't give you a minute and I've often felt reactive instead of proactive. They get you in a spin and you don't know which way is up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I notice that it is not legally signed for on behalf of Swift First

 

 

The guy who signed.... signed it as a letter " Yours sincerely" outside the actual agreement so it ihas not been executed as of yet so they can't try to enforce it until they do.

 

sparkie

 

Hia Sparkie,

 

Can you point me on the right direction were I can source this a legal point for consideration. I've been going through the FSA pdfs and OFT stuff but I can't locate it. I mentioned it to Trading Standards yesterday but need to source it legally. Thanks for your help. Hope you're good.:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hia Sparkie,

 

Can you point me on the right direction were I can source this a legal point for consideration. I've been going through the FSA pdfs and OFT stuff but I can't locate it. I mentioned it to Trading Standards yesterday but need to source it legally. Thanks for your help. Hope you're good.:-)

 

All your documents refer to is .......that it is a mortgage APPLICATION/ PROPOSAL, you have signed it as a MOrtgage proposal .........it does not become an actual mortgage document unless it is signed by SWIFT ....INSIDE THE MORTGAGE DOCUMENT.....along side yours.....just like any other proper legal document, not outside as a love letter like yours is;):D

 

It should state something like ....signed on behalf of Swift Advances

........Adolf Hitler or someone?????

 

sparkie

 

 

sparkie

Link to post
Share on other sites

All your documents refer to is .......that it is a mortgage APPLICATION/ PROPOSAL, you have signed it as a MOrtgage proposal .........it does not become an actual mortgage document unless it is signed by SWIFT ....INSIDE THE MORTGAGE DOCUMENT.....along side yours.....just like any other proper legal document, not outside as a love letter like yours is;):D

 

It should state something like ....signed on behalf of Swift Advances

........Adolf Hitler or someone?????

 

sparkie

 

sparkie

 

That's what I thought:D But it says on the first page that it becomes a legally binding contract when they release the funds and they date the Legal Charge.

 

"not outside as a love letter like yours is" ;):D - I'd hate to get hate mail!

 

Where can I confirmation in a legal capacity that it must be signed inside - Seance with Hitler maybe? :)

 

Thanks for the giggles Sparkie :wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's what I thought:D But it says on the first page that it becomes a legally binding contract when they release the funds and they date the Legal Charge.

 

"not outside as a love letter like yours is" ;):D - I'd hate to get hate mail!

 

Where can I confirmation in a legal capacity that it must be signed inside - Seance with Hitler maybe? :)

 

Thanks for the giggles Sparkie :wink:

 

 

Hi busterg, it is really good that we are learning together, and I don't know about you but sparkie has been my biggest inspiration. I have learned so much through him, and can see that you are learning too.

 

I would love to share any information that maybe of help to you or anyone else who may need it. After all everything I have learned, well most of everything is becasue of CAG.

 

I don't know if yours and my situation is the same because I believe you have a mortgage and I have a secured loan. My secured loan is a 2nd charge on my property, my mortgage is the 1st charge. If there is any way that I can be of help please ask as I will be more than pleased to do so.

 

 

Even though we learn a lot from CAG it don't do no harm in trying to get as much as information ffrom as many places as we can, after all it is all beneficial not only to us but to others too.

 

Good luck with all the hard work you are doing, and let me know if you need any information:grin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just sent the OFT copies of 4 CCA regulated agreements that Customers have enterd into with Swift Advances PLC..................Not much to shout about folks may think............BUT here is the crunch ...To enter into CCA regulated agreement activity the Lender must hold a CCA licence issued by the OFT..........to trade without a licence is a CRIMINAL offence ....and guess what Swift Advances Plc have not been issued with one........another nail in the coffin;):D

 

 

spakie

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just sent the OFT copies of 4 CCA regulated agreements that Customers have enterd into with Swift Advances PLC..................Not much to shout about folks may think............BUT here is the crunch ...To enter into CCA regulated agreement activity the Lender must hold a CCA licence issued by the OFT..........to trade without a licence is a CRIMINAL offence ....and guess what Swift Advances Plc have not been issued with one........another nail in the coffin;):D

 

 

spakie

 

Sorry to burst the bubble Sparkie but here you go:

 

Application / Licence Details

 

 

 

 

Licence Number:0391618

Licence Status:Current

 

Current Applicant / Licensee:

 

Business NameCompany Registration NumberSwift Advances plc1800474

 

Categories:

 

Consumer credit Consumer hire Credit brokerage Credit reference agency Debt adjusting/counselling Debt collecting

 

Right To Canvass Off Trade Premises:Yes

 

 

Trading Name(s) (Historic):

 

Eastern Collecting Agency Eastern Counselling Agency Eastern Collection Agency

 

Issued Date: 09-Apr-1995

Expiry Date: 14-Apr-2010

 

 

Legal Formation:

 

Body Corporate (incorporated inside UK)

 

 

Public Register

 

Do you know something else?

 

Swift 1st dont have one as it lapsed last year but, I believe it doesn't matter because it only relates to regulated agreements.

 

I raised this last year with them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Received this email this from OFT

 

We would like to clarify that Swift has not applied to add Kestrel Holdings Limited as a trading style to its licence nor applied for a licence to cover that company. Instead Swift has sent OFT a notification that Andrew Punch and Kestrel Holdings Limited are now officers of Swift Advances Plc.

The notification is in compliance with section 36 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 which places a statutory requirement on licensees to notify OFT of such a change within 21 days of it happening. OFT is in turn required to update the Public Register accordingly.

 

Event Details

 

Licence Details:

 

 

Licence/Application Number Licence Status Applicant/Holder Name 0391618 Current Swift Advances plc

Event Details:

 

 

Event Number Event Type Date of Receipt Closed Date Status 26 Notification 12-Feb-2010 Open

Licence Event Details:

 

RoleNameActionOfficerAndrew PunchPendingOfficerKestrel Holdings LimitedPending

 

 

 

Im missing something. Why bother to do this? Anything to do with what Saprkie unearthed? Makes me wonder.

 

This the same guy? - http://uk.linkedin.com/pub/andrew-punch/5/952/932

Edited by busterg
Link to post
Share on other sites

The bubble isn't burst mateyt I can assure there is stuff that Iam not going to post but when it does come out you will see "old sparkie" will be right;):D

Remember .....you brought this up last year..... a lot has been discovered since then;)

 

sparkie

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4946 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...