Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I live in a student house, with 5 tenants, unihomes is our utilities provider, who we each have a direct debit set up with and have paid each bill every month. Two letters were sent in my name by BWLegal saying I had two outstanding payments due adding up to over £3500, I have tried to contact british gas (as that is apparently our houses provider) as well as Unihomes. Nothing has helped and BWlegal are pursuing legal action if these debts are not resolved by the 1st May. What do I do? I've called Bwlegal when i bring up that the debt isnt for me and for unihomes they hang up on me. so I am stressed and do not know what to do
    • cant do either if its not in a public place or on your land. dx  
    • scared of what? you simply jumped at turnstile.... it's not a prison sentence and done very doubtfully of any criminal. exuberance of youth stupid act at very very worst it will be a warning letter if anything ever happens ..means nothing going fwd. dx          
    • Hi, everyone. I received a letter from TfL investigator/Prosecutor. The letter reads as follow:   ''Thank you for responding to our enquiry letter. Your comments will be taken into consideration when reviewing whis case and we will contact you as soon as we have reached a decision. TfL now consider prosecution against passengers who are in breach of all TfL byelaw offences and I must inform you that further legal action may be taken. TfL byelaws can be found at ... Please do not hesitate to contact me if I can assist you further.''   The letter was sent 23 days after I replied to them. Should I send another begging letter to IAP? I'm extremely scared now. Thanks all.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Cabot Say Debt Not Statute Barred: What Do I Do Next???**WON**


PossVox
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5478 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Is the general consensus that they'll discontinue do you think?

 

What stage is the case at, have you received an AQ yet? what was the final date for your defence to be filed by?

Did you make your application on th N244?

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 298
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

The n244 was mentioned by GM in post 132, but never mind that.

 

As they have taken so long to respond, i suspect they have nothing so will probably discontinue next week, it will cost them more money if they want to go on to the AQ stage, having said that i thought one of mine would do the same but i was wrong, anything is possible.

  • Haha 1

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...
Hi,

 

I just read my CPR 31.14 request sent to Cabot and this paragraph interests me...

 

"If you are unable to comply with this request and believe that you will never be able to comply with this request you must tell me in writing.

Please note that if you should fail to comply with this request, fail to request more time or fail to agree to an extension of time for the filing of my defence, I will make an application to the court for an order that the proceedings be struck out or stayed for non-compliance and a summary costs order.

 

I do hope this will not be necessary and look forward to hearing from you.

 

yours faithfully"

Since Cabot have not responded to my 31.14 AT ALL, does this mean I can write to the court and ask for the case to be struck out?

 

Would it be worth sending Cabot an "ACCOUNT IN SERIOUS DISPUTE" letter as I beleieve that non-compliance with a CCA request (requested in September) means that they cannot take court action?

 

PV :-)

 

You can carry out the threat you made in your CPR 31.14 request, this will cost you £75, you can download the form from the HMCS website.

 

Dont bother writing to cabot, now that the matter is in court

 

Have you had an Allocation Questionaire to fill in?

 

It would also be worth re-posting up the POC, and your defence to it, in order to help us to sort out the best way forward

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi CCM,

 

Thanks for the reply.

 

Do you think it is worth paying the £75? Is it a DJ who looks at it?

 

No AQ yet, the clerk at County Court said that a DJ would look at the claim this week and decide whether to let it proceed, stay it or throw it out.

 

I'll try and post up the PoC a.s.a.p.

 

PV :-)

 

I need to re-read everything again, that's why the POC/Defence will be useful.

 

It is form N244 BTW. Yes a judge does have to look at all ANs...not sure yet whether its worth it

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, give me a bit of time, ill come up with something, may need to ask a few more questions, just helping a few others, but now have you on my sticky notes:)

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a long thread, i have read the 1st few pages, this claim was issued last September, you really should have been pressing for some action a long time ago...however, it now seems that they have requested the stay be lifted and to that end it has been transferred to your local court.

 

You should now be getting an AQ to fill in, have you got this? if so what date must you file it by?

 

Since you haven't filed a suitable defence, we will need details of the relevant facts in order to complete the AQ

 

1. have you had a copy of the agreement?

2. have you had a letter before action?

3. earlier capquest was mentioned, what was/is their invovement?

4. have you had a notice of assignment from both the original creditor and cabot and capquest, if they were involved?

5. what date does the alledged account date from roughly?

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have everything going for you here as havinastella says, you could have filed a killer defence, but too late now,,,no matter, you need to wait for the judges order, but not too long, phone again early next week, if still no go, consider the N244 to have their claim struck out.

 

PS at one point tonight i got confused with yours and a couple of other cases, and started doing a defence, which would have been stunning, pity we cant use it:(

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Just a word of warning. Unless you hear OFFICIALLY in writing from the COURT then you should attend.

 

Agree with ODC, phone the court asap, ask whether the court has received their Notice of Discontinuance.

 

Do we trust them? does anyone who knows them? NO!

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...