Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

My Mrs Vs Barclays Bank Charges


FredFerret
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5777 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All

 

Please accept my apologies if this has been covered elsewhere,, I have had a good look but not found anything,, so here goes.....

 

As most of us know, Barclays bought the Woolwich in 2000. My Mrs has and account with W/B which was running fine until sometime around 2006 ish, when it became impossible to get an up to date balance from the hole in the wall,,, Things like saying we had £60 balance and £30 available (Which I understand) but when we drew £10 from the £30 available we got hit with the standard £30 bank charges because apparently it wasn't available :confused:

 

So as a result of this we were getting hit about 3 times per month which apparently is the max amount of times they will charge you. So my thought was to go through all available statements to calculate how much they have charged in order to reclaim. But this is where the problems start..

 

The most we can go back is 3 months, whereas this has been going on for a couple of years,, (maybe not three times a month over the couple of years because that was before I was made redundant). So,,, Is it a good idea to work out how much we have been charged over the past 3 months and the assume this as an 'average' month,, and claim for 24 months at the same rate? and let them work out how much they owe us and then provide statements to show?

 

Any Ideas would be greatly appreciated!

 

Thanks

 

Ade

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fred

 

Its not a problem

 

You have a few posts to your credit is this your first actual claim.

 

If so you need to send off an S.A.R. first.

 

Copy of letter here http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/516-1-data-protection-act.html

 

This will cost you a tenner, plus the cost of a recorded letter, chances are they may even give you the tenner back.

 

Once you have all your statements follow the steps, and stick to the timescales.

 

If you need any further help just give us a shout.

Sharkie

Link to post
Share on other sites

The most we can go back is 3 months, whereas this has been going on for a couple of years,, (maybe not three times a month over the couple of years because that was before I was made redundant). So,,, Is it a good idea to work out how much we have been charged over the past 3 months and the assume this as an 'average' month,, and claim for 24 months at the same rate? and let them work out how much they owe us and then provide statements to show?

 

 

Why cant you simply write to Barclays and ask for the relevant statements, they are obliged to give them to you. Then you would KNOW how much you have been charged.

 

BB

Please note: I am not a lawyer and as such any advice I give is purely from a laymans point of view;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks All,,, Beaubrummie,,, I have always been led to believe they can charge for the statements,, besides they reckon that anything older than 3 months,, they dont have,,, yeah right! lol,,, so I figured that by claiming for an amount that is higher than they actually owe us, they would provide the statements on their own accord????,,

 

And yeah Sharkie,, its my first claim,,, although I did sent a letter to natwest reclaiming some bank charges (only about £60) but they sent a letter back saying that its all on hold until the courts make a decision on the big case. I have also sent a couple of CCA requests to Bryan Carter.

 

So Im guessin S.A.R 1st then and see what happens...

 

Thank you both!! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fred

 

Definitely send of the S.A.R.

 

As for the letter you received from NW, just a standard.

Follow it up as per the recommended schedule, just keep the pressure on.

 

Keep posting.

Sharkie

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...