Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

versus cabot....almost won i think !!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5689 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi scatoony

this is typical of cabot, just like any other dca

 

i am just finishing a pertic of claim for two illegal defaults by lowells and arrow globel

 

all this correspondents are not helping

they should remove the default until they complete there investigations, after all, its your credit file tarnished

 

just a sugestion

 

send cabot a letter before action

give them two weeks to remove the illegal default

 

looks better in case a court claim is needed

Link to post
Share on other sites

gosh this is almost a mirror image of cabot and me ,they are trying to chase a creditcard debt also to monument which i have never had which they say was taken out in 2002 ,it is almost statute barred as i have made no payments because it isnt mine and told the credit ageny this and the replies i have recieved from cabot are the same they then tried to say it was maybe my wifes who died just after the date they say it was taken out i will wait till the full 6 yrs are up then hopefully it will be taken off my records

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Cabot are well known on here for not letting the facts get in the way of them claiming you owe money!!!

 

Still not sure where i stand though, if they have not sent me the relevant and correct paperwork (ie CCA) then do i need to write to them and reject it.

 

I would also like to make a formal complaint so would i cover it all in one letter or write two seperate letters?

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looking at the date of the last payment on this account I would continue playing games with Crabrot until next year when it looks like the debt becomes Statute Barred :D

 

Regards

Bigandy

The Grand essentials of happiness are: something to do, something to love, and something to hope for.

Link to post
Share on other sites

mine is statute barred in 3weeks i got it marked down on the calender lol , even tho it def. isnt my application ,i will then check my credit files and make sure it aint on there . i have this feeling that it was just before the wife died and i know she never done it and neither did i we were in Paris for 3 weeks then i took her ashes back there so it was all upheavel straight after that we weren,t allowed back in the house due to sudden death and the police etc and that covers the date im sure of it ,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yet again the paperwork sent to you has a bar code on it marked application form. I honestly believe that Cabot are marking all paperwork like this with a unique barcode to enable them to identify posters on here. Otherwise why does all documentation now arriving from Cabot seem to have these barcodes on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yet again the paperwork sent to you has a bar code on it marked application form. I honestly believe that Cabot are marking all paperwork like this with a unique barcode to enable them to identify posters on here. Otherwise why does all documentation now arriving from Cabot seem to have these barcodes on.

 

 

Hi,

 

I have heard of this before on here, You may be right and i did think of removing it but when i think about it even if it was their barcode it wouldnt matter would it? i am just getting advice from better informed people than myself, nothing is put on here that they dont or wont soon know about anyway. Its a good theory though, may pay to remove them in future.

 

 

 

Back to the help i need though, has any one got any advice on what i do next? even i can see its not a complete credit agreement but do i challenge them or just ignore them?

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...