Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • you mean you did aos on mcol yes? pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’.  Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time.  You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID.  You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.<<**IMPORTANT**  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?486334-CPR-31.14-Request-to-use-on-receipt-of-a-PPC-(-Private-Land-Parking-Court-Claim type your name ONLY no need to sign anything .you DO NOT await the return of paperwork. you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform.   dx  
    • The Letter of Claim information is not absolutely essential, but it would be useful for two reasons. Firstly, judges take a dim view of companies or individuals who rush to court without giving the other party notice and a chance to settle - the Letter of Claim.  If they didn't send it we could include this point in your defence and it would be detrimental to them. Secondly, we know Countrywide.  They are a very small cowboy company.  The are reluctant to do court, simply becasue they are very bad  at it.  Their record of beating Caggers in front of a judge is exactly 0%.  They have lost every time.  They send the Letter of Claim also to look for people who don't reply, thinking that the person might not reply to a claim form either, giving them an easy default win.  Conclusion - always best to reply to a Letter of Claim and ridicule the PPC's case.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

help neded


lynne2john
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5830 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi just wondering if somene can help, i am in the process claiming my bank charges back but i have got myself a bit confused! I have wrote to abbey requesting my charges back from what i have read i am probably going to get the usual reply that the charges are right etc and that they will need 4 weeks to investigate, do i wait 4 weeks or do i send them the 2nd letter from the template library straight away, also i know i give them 14 days to reply to this am i right? then i file the N1 form am i right or am i more confused than i thought! any help appreciated cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi thanks for that it is a big help, will get 2 letter sent off now then wil have to wait and see hoping won't have to go to court to settle but i amdetermined to get my money back, thanks again lynne

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

i sent the prelim letter to abbey requesting my charges back and now i am preparing to send the letter before action, as they haven't even had the decency to reply, the question is l sent the first letter to the triton square address is this correct or have i sent it to the wrong address, i want to make sure before i send the 2 letter can someone please confirm this

thanks lynne

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

well sent 2 letter off to abbey, they haven't even replied to the first one is this normal i know they received it as i sent it recorded and have checked on royal mail site and it says it was delivered, just wondering why i never received a letter as i thought i might of got the usual standard rubbish they send lynne

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

just received a reply from abbey to the first letter i sent, i'm not sure what to make of it or what to do next, i have sent off the 2 letter as their time limit was up, but i received a letter today saying (i'll keep it brief as its 2 pages long) they received my letter and usualy it would be dealt with through their complaints office but until the legal issues are sorted involving the courts the normal timetable for dealing with bank charges has been suspended and that if i were to go to court they will immediately order a stay on any action and it could be months before being sorted out, they also included a factsheet from the FOS about unautherised overdraft charges. How is this going to affect my claim as the money they are taking is benefit money and the more charges they take the more debt i am getting into i did tell them it was benefit money but it has made no difference but i will never get straight as i'm constantly paying charges i am claiming for £800 which compared to some is relatively small, i am still going to proceed with the courts but it would be nice if there was another way to getting my money back sooner sorry this so long but i don't know what to do for the best

cheers lynne

Link to post
Share on other sites

How is this going to affect my claim

It doesn't, their letter doesn't change a thing.

 

i am still going to proceed with the courts but it would be nice if there was another way to getting my money back sooner
Unfortunately, whilst the FSA's waiver stays in place, their is little you can do to speed things up.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

thanks for all your help, i have been told to e-mail inga kirkman to see if we could sort out an agreement of payment due to it being benefit money i'm not sure how correct this advice is but if it helps i suppose there is no harm in trying although i am still going to carry on with my claim unless by some miracle this inga kirkman pays up which i can't see!! Has anyone else tried this and if so have they had any luck cheers lynne

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...