Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

blemain-eviction notice


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5530 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Im sure you can prove your payments when you do at the next hearing ask that you dont have to pay the costs of that hearing or there charges for preparing the witness statement as it was there mistake otherwise you will find Solicotrs cost on the account for many hundreds

Well done

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK wait untill tomorrow and check again they have until 4.00pm today can fax it over then wait untill your next hearing date keep paying when you get the hearing date do a witness saying that that they have not complied andlist everything that you have paid

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also as the paying party you are entitled to see invoices of all amounts put on your account so write and ask for copies of Solicitors bills ask what post litgation charges are what are proffessional fees ask for invoice

Link to post
Share on other sites

NO it will take time to get the warrent at least two weeks and if that is the case we can appeal , Ok just keep paying and wait untill tsay the 14th June then do another witnes statement or even before if they come up with one

 

 

 

Take care

Link to post
Share on other sites

there fees are NOT reasonable if they have incurred a second hearing because of there mis information you might have a case for them not being allowed to put on their fees

Edited by Bona
left ou a word
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes if you have to loddge a statement by the 26th May then do wait untill that date or just before and if they have not done one you can say then just before the hearing do an updated one Im a away next week but will be back the following and will try to pick up PMs if you get stuck

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Your quiet right these people think that orders dont apply to them we have a case running where the otherside have not complied with the court orders at least 6 times its awfull but yes go for non complience if they dont comply you can ask for there claim to be struck out on the 23rd and your costs

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...