private parking tickets

[Geronimoman]

Some interesting information about Leegomery/southpaw on there too

 

What do you mean? Who is this person?

[Geronimoman]

Not binding but persuasive certainly. And it is the first case as far as I am aware that a PPC turned up to a properly defended case. In the past they ran a mile when confronted with a decent defence, despite what CPS would have you believe. The fact that they lost when faced with a decent defence says it all really.

[Geronimoman]

CPS identified him on their website. Not something I am prepared to repeat here as I have no wish to promulgate what looks to me like things the Information Commissioners Office will be interested in. Really seems to me that CPS have 'lost it big time'. Anyone know who runs this 'business' ?

 

From previous posts it appears to be a character called Mike Perkins who runs a cafe, presumably when he is not handing out tickets. Appears to be known as "perky" and seems to be well known here for claiming victories when the defendant fails to turn up.I agree the internet posting on the CPS website is bizarre - an accuastion of dishonesty like this is not something a rational person would make without very convincing evidence. I also hope for "perky's" sake that is not the chaps real name. If it is then I think perky would be sensible to get a good defamation lawyer sharpish.

[Geronimoman]

On the contrary the de brunner case was woefully argued. It was not a defence at all. There are at least five vital points which were not put to the judge. The same is true of the other cases. A proper defence will in my experience always see off these [problematic]. Perky's summation of the legal issues is a joke but then he is an rank amateur lawyer (and a very bad one) of the type he despises.But as perky and his cronies regularly scan these pages I would not advise you to discuss detailed legal issues or any other specific aspect of your case further here.

[Geronimoman]

Looks like Perky is not the only one with something to hide!

 

You're right but not in the way you expect. This poster susancole or someone purporting to be "her" has just posted on Pepipoo a bizarre message and has been outed there as a PPC troll. Didn't know the PPCs had this level of subtlety in them. Usually all they are able to do is sign up under some stupid name like Justin Piddlepot and make pointless popsts telling people to pay up.Regards me and Perky I know of him. Who doesn't? You only need to read the historic postings made by him and his skivvies like "interesting" if you fancy a good laugh.

[Geronimoman]

Yes I did note the sarcasm. It was certainly worthy of Perky. In fact now I look at "Susan's" earlier posts hairy little characters who hide under bridges and threaten little goats call out to me.

[Geronimoman]

I am convinced perky comes here all the time, along with his associates. This susan character has just posted about some bogus upcoming case on Pepipoo on some ridiculous pretext involving a journalist and alleging pepipoo members had been involved. It is laughable that onyone would think that such a post would be taken seriously. The thread has been closed there. This is the second time this susan character posted on pepipoo. The first was to attack a member who has been attacked by perky, even to the extent of putting the person's photo on his website. IP addresses can easily identify the PPC trolls, as they don't appear to have the wit to avoid leaving tracks. Free speech is all very well but when you have been banned for threatening another member, which I gather is the case here, why should you be allowed back? And if all the PPC trolls have to offer is signing up in ridiculous names and saying "pay up" and other such comments which add nothing to the debate then they cannot surely expect anyone to take them seriously.

[Geronimoman]

I have a view that Scottish parking is legal,

 

I think we can all agree on that.

[Geronimoman]

I saw that post on pepipoo, i have looked up oldham county court but as with the lower courts in Scotland the cases are not showing anywhere.

I have found a site called courtserve that claims to list county court cases but you need to be a member, surely someone on here is and they can check ?

 

I must say that you're taking a very keen interest in a fantasy case involving a PPC (wouldn't be involving Perky's outfit by any chance) for someone who claims to be from Scotland and have no axe to grind. It is almost as if you and others like "susan" are trying to get some information out. Seems that way to me anyway. I hope you can understand the suspicion with the level of PPC trolling that has gone on in the past few months. Most resaonable people will be able to spot an "agenda" a long way off.

[Geronimoman]

That's what I read in one of the threads anyway, I have no idea of whether it is true or not. I guess only perky and the mods know what went on when he was banned. From old threads it appears that the original "perky" is Mike Perkins of Combined Parking Solutions.

[Geronimoman]

I would agree that the term "perky" has widened to cover PPCs who seem overly confident of their legal position and who post undefended or poorly defended judgements as some sort of landmark decision in favour of PPCs. No doubt "perky" in one of his no doubt many guises will be back on soon to tell us of another landmark victory and we will all listen with deaf ears. To be honest it would do "perky" and the other PPC posters no harm if they debated the position reasonably and without the strident tone and false confidence that they often show. Then others might listen and be prepared to engage in the debate.

[Geronimoman]

it looks like perky (under his id) has not posted for months .. Well I got to page 22 on here and stopped looking, so absent other evidence he has not.

 

Which part of "he was banned" are you having a problem with?In the new spirit of openness, can I ask you to tell us what your angle is? All your posts so far are pro-PPC. You discuss a case in another thread which is discussed in Perky's website, using more or less the same arguments. Tell us why this area has such fascination for you and no doubt people will be less suspicious as to your motives.

[Geronimoman]

Just an interested observer. Have had PPC tickets in the past which I did not pay and heard nothing more of it. I would advise anyone to do the same.

[Geronimoman]

Right enough I cannot see any DPA listing for CPS, checked against trading name and postcode. I find it hard to believe that perky would be dumb enough to operate without such a registration. It does appear that more checks with the ICO and/or DVLA will be necessary to confirm one way or the other.

[Geronimoman]

Funny that, "scottish" mark how you found Perky's DP registration within 2 seconds. Add that to your continuing attempts to publicise some unimportant Oldham case which are now becoming laughable (I'd now wager my life it involves CPS - let's see if that pans out when you or "perky" post back - no doubt following another great victory in the annals of PPC cases) and your lack of condemnation of the personal attacks on Perky's website makes me think you are indeed in the "Wolverhampton" part of Scotland.

[Geronimoman]

you fool geronimoman.

The usernames may change but the level of insults never does.