Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Egg Credit Card Agreement


barns66
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5239 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I would like to refer you back to post #10 - the agreement they sent (if the two pages are copies of the front and back of the same physical piece of paper) is enforceable in court and IMO complies with their obligations under the CCA 1974. It has the prescribed terms (prescribed in schedule 6 of the Consumer Credit (Agreements) Regulations 1983) and you signature in the same document. What they said in their letter in post #26 is true.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Hi barns, How did you get on with your egg agreement in the end. I have discovered today that the old Egg agreements, such as yours and mine state that a limit (or words to that effect) will be determined from time to time. Pt has said that in fact, and several leading barristers have confirmed this, that the actual words "credit limit" must be used in order for it to qualify as a prescribed terms. So this may be something you can use to get your agreement declared unenforceable. Magda

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi barns, How did you get on with your egg agreement in the end. I have discovered today that the old Egg agreements, such as yours and mine state that a limit (or words to that effect) will be determined from time to time. Pt has said that in fact, and several leading barristers have confirmed this, that the actual words "credit limit" must be used in order for it to qualify as a prescribed terms. So this may be something you can use to get your agreement declared unenforceable. Magda

 

Hi Magda

I have been paying the dca an amount each month but they now are wanting more,i will have a look at what you have pointed out and ask around for info on this.

 

barns66

Link to post
Share on other sites

The agreement you have there does not comply with Schedule 6 para 3 of SI 1983/1553

 

A term stating the credit limit or the manner in which it will be determined or that there is no credit limit
Now the CCA 1974 sets out what "Credit" is at section 9

Meaning of credit.9. — (1)

 

In this Act “credit ” includes a cash loan, and any other form of financial accommodation.

Now the act defines credit, the prescribed term required refers to Credit so it stands to reason that in this case the word Limit does not suffice

 

this is the opinion given by a barrister who was senior counsel in Wilson and Hurstanger

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Just a 2 quick questions,who would i send the letter to egg or the dca and is there a letter any where on the site i could copy and adapt.

 

barns66

 

Hi, I would send it to the DCA, as they are handling the account at the moment and they will refer back to Egg anyway. The letter I've drafted below might be of some use and you can adapt it if you want. Good luck, Magda

 

Further to your letter dated........ To reiterate, the documents provided in response to my CCA request were a follows: a two page document – the signature document being the second page and not containing any of the prescribed terms. The terms and conditions relevant to the account were not provided.

 

I would also draw your attention to the prescribed terms contained within the document sent to me. The first page (unsigned) states “we will tell you from time to time the approved limit we have set and if different the individual limit you have chosen for the account.” This does not conform to the requirement of the Consumer Credit Act, as although the limit may be advised from “time to time,” the wording must be: “credit Limit” and not merely approved limit or such like.The words Credit limit MUST be used, no other word is permissible. The use of the term “Credit Limit” is essential in order for the agreement to be in the prescribed form and to contain all of the prescribed terms.

 

I am pleased to see that you confirm this as a true copy of the original agreement executed by yourselvesHowever, as you must realise this “agreement” does not conform to sections 60(1) and 61(1) of the Consumer credit Act and is therefore unenforceable under section 127(3) of the same act.

 

You entered into default of my request some time ago. Whilst the account is in dispute, you are not permitted to ask for any payment, nor am I obliged to offer any payment to you. Furthermore, whilst the dispute remains, you are not entitled to charge any interest on the account, make any further charges to the account or pass the account to anybody else.Please note you may also consider this letter a statutory notice under Section 10 of the Data Protection Act to cease processing any data in relation to this account with immediate effect. This means you must remove all information regarding this account from your own internal records and from my records with any credit reference agencies including any defaults.

 

Should you refuse to comply, you must within 21 days provide me with a detailed breakdown of your reasoning behind continuing to process my data. It is not sufficient to simply state that you have a ‘legal right’, you must outline your reasoning in this matter and state upon which legislation this reasoning depends.

 

Should you fail to respond within 21 days, I will expect that this means you agree to remove all such dataI shall also be considering further action to recover unlawfully applied interest and charges that have been levied on the “Agreement."

 

Yours faithfully

Edited by MAGDA
Link to post
Share on other sites

hello just want to ask hou can you take defaults off your credit history report to do with barcleys bank somebody please HELP PLEASE......

 

Hi Archey, probably be better if you start your own thread where you can go into a bit more detail, and that way I'm sure you will get some help, Magda

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, I would send it to the DCA, as they are handling the account at the moment and they will refer back to Egg anyway. The letter I've drafted below might be of some use and you can adapt it if you want. Good luck, Magda

 

Further to your letter dated........ To reiterate, the documents provided in response to my CCA request were a follows: a two page document – the signature document being the second page and not containing any of the prescribed terms. The terms and conditions relevant to the account were not provided.

 

I would also draw your attention to the prescribed terms contained within the document sent to me. The first page (unsigned) states “we will tell you from time to time the approved limit we have set and if different the individual limit you have chosen for the account.” This does not conform to the requirement of the Consumer Credit Act, as although the limit may be advised from “time to time,” the wording must be: “credit Limit” and not merely approved limit or such like.The words Credit limit MUST be used, no other word is permissible. The use of the term “Credit Limit” is essential in order for the agreement to be in the prescribed form and to contain all of the prescribed terms.

 

I am pleased to see that you confirm this as a true copy of the original agreement executed by yourselvesHowever, as you must realise this “agreement” does not conform to sections 60(1) and 61(1) of the Consumer credit Act and is therefore unenforceable under section 127(3) of the same act.

 

You entered into default of my request some time ago. Whilst the account is in dispute, you are not permitted to ask for any payment, nor am I obliged to offer any payment to you. Furthermore, whilst the dispute remains, you are not entitled to charge any interest on the account, make any further charges to the account or pass the account to anybody else.Please note you may also consider this letter a statutory notice under Section 10 of the Data Protection Act to cease processing any data in relation to this account with immediate effect. This means you must remove all information regarding this account from your own internal records and from my records with any credit reference agencies including any defaults.

 

Should you refuse to comply, you must within 21 days provide me with a detailed breakdown of your reasoning behind continuing to process my data. It is not sufficient to simply state that you have a ‘legal right’, you must outline your reasoning in this matter and state upon which legislation this reasoning depends.

 

Should you fail to respond within 21 days, I will expect that this means you agree to remove all such dataI shall also be considering further action to recover unlawfully applied interest and charges that have been levied on the “Agreement."

 

Yours faithfully[/quote

 

Hi Magda

Thanks for the letter and i will use it when i get in touch with the cca,if thats ok with you.

 

barns66

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Hello. I'm hoping someone can help. Not sure if I'm posting on the right page either, however, its about EGG and I need some help.

 

I have followed, like many people, the route as above, however, have received the following letter from EGG.

 

They state that LIMIT is referred to in Condition 3 of the Agreement which states, 'we will tell you from time to time the Approved Limit we have set and if different the Individual limit which you have chosen for the Account'

 

They also refer to parts of the agreement for my challenge on the APR and default charges !

 

Can anyone help from here ?!? Letters I should write, action I should take ?!?!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...