Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

BlackHorse PPI battle?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5912 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Well after joining this forum a few weeks back I realised we had been sold a PPI by blackhorse with our loan - this is a seperate payment and attracts interest but comes out each month with the loan figure.

I didn't even know we didn't need the PPI until BlackHorse told me themselves they shouldn't "hard sell" such things? So ive used the standard initial letter from the forum and today I have received a reply?

 

BlackHorse have told me to get stuffed basically.

 

They say as I didn't cancel during the 30 days as stated we now can't cancell - what 30 days? nobody emphasised that one?

 

They say I can complain to the financial ombudsman service if I want to?

 

They say that when I applied for the loan I was asked certain criteria to show I needed the PPI, again since when was this explained to me - they have sent a copy of this criteria and its all BS.It states that we couldn't make the payments if we became critically ill or suffered loss of life - I have cover through work for this but it shows a No against this question - ie showing we need the cover. This again was never explained to us.

 

They have covered their tracks well and sold the PPI by hiding it in gumph when we applied and now they are refusing to cancell it and obviously won't repay the last 6 payments we have made.

 

Where do I go from here on this one?

 

Also interestingly enough I have also received a letter about PPI's today from ther competition commision concerning being mis sold PPI's and stating they may contact me shortly to get my views, WEird how this arrives same day as BlackHorse tell me to go play on the motorway?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would ask BH for a copy of their complaints procedure, as you cannot get the FOS involved uness you can show you have formally taken this route.

 

If they refuse to take your complaint, you can contact the FOS straight away.

All help is merely my opinion only - please seek legal advice if you need to as I am only qualified in SEN law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...