Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Today , after a lotof years i recieved a letter from this lot. Very friendly, "Were writing to remind you that we havent had any contact from you in a while".  The velvet fist, followed by  a veiled threat to get their preferred debt collectors involved. Yep dead right. In 1992/3 I took out a Student load under duress from DHSS. uP TO 2000 I hadsucessfully gotten deferment on low income. But rarther thansign on as unemployed,I decided to be self employed. I applied and they asked for all sorts of documents. I obliged and then correspondance ceased from them, circa 2001. To date  I have had no correspondance from Student Loans. I was made  redundant in 2009 and  reached 65 in 2012 , at which age the loan should have been cancelled. Now ,today, 12 years on retirement and 11 ( at least years after last contact) I get a letter with veiled threats. Do I , as I smell a scam a) ignore it and hope that Erudio will think that this phishing attempt has failed or b) respond with a statute barred letter or c) remind them of legal terms that loan should be cancelled 12 years ago or d) combination of b) +c)      
    • But I'm not mixing and matching. Sure, when researching I do check multiple avenues, but when speaking, I will open a single post. The Fb post was made in March, it is now June, time has passed, and when the suggestion was made, no further information was given on how I should progress beyond "send a letter", which has meant that I've needed to start another stream - this one, but only after taking the time to research first.
    • hes not turning you away he is simply saying that you should stick to one channel of advice. he is perfectly happy with that channel being this forum, and he will help you   all he is saying, and I agree, is that you should stick to one help channel, not mix and match 3/4
    • As long as we are clear . Do the reading and post your letter of claim in draft form as requested and we can go from there.    
    • Hold on @BankFodder, that was a bit harsh. I spoke with the EVRi complaints Facebook group to begin with, a user on that group told me to send a letter but didn't give any specifics. Here at CAG, I was looking more for specific help as I've never raised such a claim before, and wanted to be sure that my claim was correct, which is why I've researched information with the other groups too, to be sure; but you seem to have assumed that I've made some form of contact with the other groups, such that I find your comments and tone to be very unfair. And I do know a thing or two about forums, that forum users are unpaid volunteers, I happen to be a Tableau Ambassador, and so perform a very similar role helping others in an unpaid capacity  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Gross misconduct hearing


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5952 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everybody, I have a disciplinary hearing next week for alleged gross misconduct. The company have followed all the rules regarding meetings and such like but this is the first time that I have seen all the statements from others involved. The problem now is that all the statements contradict almost everything that I have said at previous meetings. This is compounded by the fact that because I work in the motor trade and all the witnesses are sales related I cannot get anybody to be a witness for me. Most of the possible witnesses are sales executives and the company can easily limit the amount of their salaries, so not keeping in with the boss will cost them money. The hearing now looks like being very one sided and I do not hold out much hope of a "fair trial". If I was to resign before the hearing is due would I still have to go through with it, (I have to give one months notice), bearing in mind that I have been suspended for 10 weeks whilst the investigation was carried out. Hope someone can point me in the right direction.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, in answer yes you could still be made to go through the meeting and theoretically you could still be dismissed while working your notice.

You could ask if they would except your resignation but if that fails then you could do this (I’ve not told you this) Go to your doctor, tell him your stressed with work etc or have a bad back anything to get a sick line, then hand that in, you can not be made to attend a meeting while sick, now resign and use your time off sick as your notice period.

Not really a nice thing to do but a practical one.

If my comments have been helpful please click my scales

Link to post
Share on other sites

It looks like you feel your employer has decided you are going to be sacked before the meeting even takes place. In this case you could approach your employer and ask them if they will consider a Compromise Agreement, whereby you resign for a package, eg a few months salary plus a clean reference? This would save your employer having to go through disciplinary hearing, appeal hearing and probably tribunal, thereby saving everyone time, money and hassle.

 

If they accept this, you can approach a solicitor who will deal with this agreement on your behalf, and the best thing here is that the employer is usually responsible for paying the fee to your solicitor.

 

Check Yell.com for a solicitor who will offer an free initial consultation.

 

Hope this helps

 

BD

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that Big Dub, all along I have felt that this was just the excuse that they wanted to get rid of me. How would I go about this compromise deal? Should I approach my manager or go straight to the HR dept at head office? Also what are my chances of success, do firms do this or would they just bluff it out like they have so far. Whilst on suspension I have felt that they would love me to give in and quit but I have stuck it out, now I have seen the statements made against me I sort of wish that I had.

 

Does anyone know what happens about the hearing if you do go sick, does it happen in your absence and therefore go on record if anyone was to ask for a reference? Anymore info gratefully received as I will have to decide very soon.

Thanks everyone

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just been through the same thing. If your sick in my case they can have the hearing without you but a union rep would present your evidence. Something I wish I'd done is prepare a script. Write down everything you want to mention and include it in your summary. They will do this. Theres lots of people on this forum who will help you out with preparing your defence and the terminology to use

Link to post
Share on other sites

No they can not hold the hearing if your off sick, the hearing has to be held at a mutually convenient time and it must be held in work time.

 

If you’re off sick you are unfit to attend work and you can demand the hearing be postponed.

If my comments have been helpful please click my scales

Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as I know, your employer does not have to agree to a compromise, however, if they want to save the hassle of going to a tribunal etc, then it would probably be in their interests.

 

Hope it works out.

 

BD

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have just contacted the HR department and they refered me back to the manager concerned. Spoke to him and he is not interested in any form of deal, I get the impression that he just wants me sacked. I suppose I will have to go through with the "kangaroo court" and wait for the result. Thanks for the replies everyone will let you know what happens.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the support old_andrew2007, not looking forward to the meeting let alone going for a tribunal. Will be on after Monday to find out whats involved in that, (loads more stress I presume) but I really will need to clear my name so will definitely have to go for it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, I have just gone through a disciplinary hearing and the decision was to sack me for gross misconduct so I understand how you must be feeling. I have appealed against the decision and and currently waiting a reply.

 

I was signed off work for severe stress and anxiety (due mainly to bullying) and was off work for six months. against doctors orders I returned to work, I lasted 5 mins in the office as I was suspended on the spot pending a disciplinary hearing.

 

They say that I failed to provide sick notes and failed to notify them of my change of address (as I moved whilst off) so was in breach of contract.

 

I submitted a sick note every month and also provided a letter from my GP saying that he had issued notes.

 

I did notify them of my change of address and had received correspondence from other departments within the firm at my new address.

 

One thing I would like to know is if anyone can help me with the following:-

 

As they said they didn't receive any sick notes they stopped paying me and I did not even receive SSP. they owe me six months wages and even though they are in receipt of the letter from my doctor, they are still refusing to pay me. I cannot claim any benefits and have been living off my savings, which have now run out, and I am struggling to be able to put food on the table for my son.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Old_andrew2018

Hi

Not an expert by any means I hope some one with the experience needed can reply to you, am am aware the some members have HR, and trade union experience

 

Regards

 

Andrew

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can’t answer about the sick pay issue except to say speak to the CAB about that. If you have been six months without any pay I’m sure there is something that can be done.

In regards of the appeal for dismissal, if what you are saying is true, then the dismissal would be unfair (how long have you worked there?) As for appealing, you would be invited to another hearing. Produce all your sick notes (your doctor can re issue back dated sick notes) and the letter, bring in copies of the letters from the other depts too.

If this fails then go see an employment lawyer.

If my comments have been helpful please click my scales

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your employer should consider one postponement of the hearing. If you beg off the second date set then they may go ahead in your absence.

Also, you say that the sales employees are basically covering themselves. You can write to your employer before the hearing and request that these colleagues are available as witnesses at the hearing and say you would like to question them in front of the chair. If your employer refuses then you possibly have a care for tribunal.

If your colleagues decline to be questioned use that in your defence. It may not work at the hearing but a tribunal will consider it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and thanks for replying. I have worked for them for over ten years, my doctor has already supplied them with a letter saying that he has issued continuous sick notes for a valid medical reason. after they were in receipt of the letter I asked my employers when they were going to pay my outstanding salary and they said well you tell us how much you think we owe you and we will consider it.

 

I have already consulted a solicitor and when I told him what they had said he said that how could I be expected to work out my salary when they are the ones dealing with the pay role.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...