Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well we can't predict what the judge will believe. PE will say that they responded in the deadline and you will say they don't. Nobody can tell what a random DJ will decide. However if you go for an OOC settlement you should still be able to get some money
    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Landlord witheld deposit, now going to court


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5888 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

We were in court on thursday against our landlord who was claiming 1200 pounds in dilapidations trying to justify why he was witholding out deposit.

 

We won, because apart from the fact he was a greedy, lying nasty piece of work, we outsmarted him and were more prepared.

 

He has to prove work has been carried out and then the judge will decide who is liable, based on probability.

 

For example: He claimed replacement of two doors and two blinds and a shower head.

 

We proved the doors and blinds had not been replaced by contacting the new owners of the property and asking them if we could take photos they luckily agreed. So he said that the blinds needed replacing and therefore this represented financial loss. As he had not replaced them he had no receipts or proof of payment. the judge through it out.

 

Regardign the shower head, again, no receipt and the judge informed us that it is the landlords responsibility to ensure all 'claening' aparatus is in good working order. So it's not your responsibilty to replace a shower that does not work.

 

If you need any help building a case I am by no means an expert but we were fully prepared and just were honest all the way.

 

He was sent packing by the jusdge, tail between his legs!!

 

Any help I can give I will

 

Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I am by no means an expert, but there are key things here that stand out as somewhat 'iffy' about your landlords claims.

 

1) Have you been provided with quotes

2) Have you been given an invoice

3) Have you a copy of an invoice or proof that the work has been carried out and the flooring and sofa replaced?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

We have been provided with the Quote that the residential company have obtained from another company, for the laminate flooring to be replaced for £1505. (Although on the scaned copy they have sent me, Invoice has been scribbled out) So as yet i think that this has not been replaced.

 

And we have received an actual invoice that the residential company have received from other company, for the sofa to be replaced, so it looks like this has already been replaced.

 

There is nothing else that we have been provided with, so there is no deffinate proof as to whether it has been replaced or not.

 

 

You dont' have any proof that the laminate flooring that was in the house cost £40 psm, fact: you can buy laminate flooring for £10 psm or less, why would they use the most expensive for a rental property?

 

I'd do some research and try to find out which company built the house and find out what grade of flooring would have been used. If they paid £10 psm originally then there's no reason why you should pay for more expensive flooring. Also you could argue that the sofa is over priced? What if they bought the original from IKEA and then went and got a better one from leather world...?

 

Just a thought .....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

We have been provided with the Quote that the residential company have obtained from another company, for the laminate flooring to be replaced for £1505. (Although on the scaned copy they have sent me, Invoice has been scribbled out) So as yet i think that this has not been replaced.

 

And we have received an actual invoice that the residential company have received from other company, for the sofa to be replaced, so it looks like this has already been replaced.

 

There is nothing else that we have been provided with, so there is no deffinate proof as to whether it has been replaced or not.

 

 

You dont' have any proof that the laminate flooring that was in the house cost £40 psm, fact: you can buy laminate flooring for £10 psm or less, why would they use the most expensive for a rental property?

 

I'd do some research and try to find out which company built the house and find out what grade of flooring would have been used. If they paid £10 psm originally then there's no reason why you should pay for more expensive flooring. Also you could argue that the sofa is over priced? What if they bought the original from IKEA and then went and got a better one from leather world...?

 

Just a thought .....

Link to post
Share on other sites

No one can say for sure if you would have a good case or not.

It largely depends on the landlord, how far they are prepared to take it and also on the judge on the day.

Unfortunately no one can tell you what to do. If you believe you are right and don't want to pay anything over and above the deposit, but you are happy for them to keep your deposit, then write to them and state this. If you believe it is unfair for them to keep all of your deposit, then work out what proportion you feel is a fair contribution, was the floor really that bad?

I wouldn't offer anything until I was sure the landlored wasn't attempting betterment, so you need to ascertain if the original flooring was expensive (not sure how tho) also the landlord may fit the floorring himself and charge you for fitting which is why they need to give you a breakdown of renovations which will state cost of floor, how much it's costing to fit etc.

I think if the flooring was so badly damaged it needed replacing, then you have to accept some liability, but if you believe he is trying to rip you off then you need to fight your corner.

First things first, decide if you are happy to not get back any of your deposit, if you think it is unfair, then write to them stating the contribution you feel to be fair deduction from your deposit, for example £500, and then state that if they still refuse to return your security deposit within 14 days, you will proceed to the small claims court to recover the rest of your deposit. It costs about £80.00 ish to go to court, it is not as scary as it sounds and will probably force them to come to some sort of compromise.

no one will be able to advise the outcome, all I can say is if I were in your shoes I would be thinking that they want me to say, just keep the deposit and call it quits, unfortunately not all landlords are honest people and scare tactics like issuing you with a bill for £1500 is intended to scare you into either just paying up or accepting that they keep your deposit.

Do you have a copy of your tenancy agreement?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Try and look at it in a different way.

 

You buy and furnish a brand new house, you rent it out for 12 months.

 

The sofa has a stain that cannot be removed and a replacement cushion cannot be sourced. You would naturally want the item to be replaced.

 

The laminate flooring is noticeably scratched from shoe marks and is not as attractive in appearance as it was 12 months ago, you would seek some compensation.

 

For the replacement laminate you would get 3 quotes and then you would expect to negotiate with the tenants. I don't know where you stand by not having a check in or check out report (signed) it probably won't stand in your favour, you are not disputing that there were scratch marks, you are disputing that they are damage.

 

I wouldn't think that it would be fair wear and tear if it needed replacing after a year. But you can find out if it was a cheap floor to start with, it doesn't sound hard wearing. As for settling up with your friend you both rented it and need to sort the financials out between you. Make your landlord and offer to keep the deposit and then ask your friend who caused the stain to give some money back to your other friend who paid a deposit. Really you could ask your friend how much they are willing to pay considering it has cost you £500 for their stain. If I had caused damage and knew my friend was footing the bill, then I would offer to pay. So speak to your friends first and see what they say.

 

Mr Shed is probably right in the sense that your case is lacking in evidence and therefore wouldn't give the judge much to go on. But before you pay anything, insist on 3 quotes and receipts.#

 

Then make what you feel is a fair offer and tell them you'd like to settle to avoid court action.

Good luck

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...