Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Do you want to shake your groove thing but don’t know any steps? Even dad dancing beyond you? Then order ‘Dancing with The Don’ and let Felon Trump teach you all the 'hottest moves Starring classic moves like: whackamole a child, flossing your nostrils, shaking the cell bars, and pointy pointing    
    • Thank you. Please will you repost your images in one single multipage PDF file – the right way round et cetera.  
    • And just to reiterate – I'm sorry if the message above sounds a bit harsh. We have to get the message out to other people who visit this thread as well. I realise that you are having a difficult time and we will do our best to help you, of course
    • The last photo shows the overflow carpark looking at the block which our room was located. When we got out of the car my partner thought that the building was for staff accommodation.  The unsecured bedroom window opened onto this car park.
    • Also I see that you are doing a lot of this on the telephone – and without any written confirmation. This is a big mistake. You need to start taking this matter seriously and so everything should go in writing. If you have telephone calls then they should normally be recorded. Read our customer services guide. You should make notes about every telephone call and then you should send an email to your telephone correspondence confirming what they have said or what they have agreed. It is important that you keep detailed paper trails here. Of course we may be jumping the gun and maybe big motoring world will step up to the mark – but I'm afraid that they have a lousy reputation has you have seen and so you need to start practising survival techniques and protecting yourself. You say for instance in your letter of rejection that the mechanic told you on the telephone that the gearbox needed replacing. Do you have any other evidence of this conversation? This is going to sound a bit harsh – but other people will be visiting this thread as well for their own purposes. You conducted their research about this company before you bought the vehicle. You now are fully aware that this is a company which can be very difficult to deal with and causes a lot of problems for many of their customers and yet you are still taking a telephone/verbal approach. Do I need to say any more? Also one of the documents you put up is an email exchange but it is not clear who is writing to who or what dates. If you showed this email to somebody in a pub they would be asking lots of questions about who sent the first message, who sent the second message, what dates were they sent et cetera. Please think about this before you post things. Please can you clarify the details of that email exchange. Please will you present the information carefully. We are all volunteers here and we have to rely on you to do the spadework
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Holiday pay


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5971 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I have a quick question which i cannot figure out and do not know the legal rights for. I work in Scotland - if that makes a difference.

 

It seems that due to low staff numbers a few of my colleagues including myself are not able to take our entire annual leave. It is my understanding that my employer will not pay us the money that we should have got for the unused annual leave days. We cannot carry these days over to the next year either. So that means that even though we have worked for enough hours to allow us the maximum number of days holiday we cannot take the days or be compensated. There are other staff who have taken all their holiday entitlement - so does that mean that those of us who have not are losing out???

 

Your help would be much appreciated

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Without knowing if there is a difference in Scotland (probably not) then you are entitled by law to your holiday and no employer can do anything about it. If they are too busy, that is their problem and they must get more staff in to cope.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yep, same rules apply all over the UK. I'd advise raising this as a grievance i.e. you're not being allowed to take holiday.

Any posts submitted here on the Consumer Action Group under the user name GlasweJen may not necessarily be the view of the poster, CAG or indeed any normal person.

 

I've become addicted to green blobs (I have 2 now) so feel free to tip my scales if I ever make sense.;-)

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It rather depends on circumstances, though.

 

If they have prevented you from taking your holiday and they won't compensate you for it - then they're in breach of contract, end of story.

 

If, however, you just didn't take all of your entitlement because of work pressure, then it can be more of a problem. In the past I have failed to take all of my holiday entitlement - it was there to take, I just had too much to get done. At the end of the year the holiday entitlement was cancelled - and that was that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is a good point VR.

Have you come to the end of the holiday year without taking all the holidays due. If so then it is as VR says, you will loose them and compensation will not be paid, a lot of employers will not carry any holidays over to the next year.

What does it say on your contract, or more correctly, your terms of employment say?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advice,

 

Under the Holidays section of my contract it states:

 

You must give at least 2 week snotice of proposed holiday days and these must then be approved by your manager. The Company reserves the right to refuse any holiday request and to nominate days which must be taken as holiday as part of your entitlement.

 

You may not carry any unused entitlement forward to a subsequent year.

 

It doesn't mention anywhere about compensation but it does say that if you terminate your employment "you will be entitled to pay in lieu of any unused holiday pro rated",

 

Would you say that being paid for holiday entitlement that you have earned if you leave employment is correct, but that if you do not leave but haven't taken your holiday you should be due the money that would balance out not taking holidays??

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, paying you your entitlement on leaving (or being dismissed) is another law they cannot get around.

They can also tell you when to take your holiday. If they have warned you that you cannot carry over holiday until the next year, then it is up to you to put in for and take that holiday before the holiday year ends.

 

It seems that due to low staff numbers a few of my colleagues including myself are not able to take our entire annual leave.

 

Are you saying that the holiday year has not finished yet and you are being denied the time off??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, paying you your entitlement on leaving (or being dismissed) is another law they cannot get around.

They can also tell you when to take your holiday. If they have warned you that you cannot carry over holiday until the next year, then it is up to you to put in for and take that holiday before the holiday year ends.

 

Are you saying that the holiday year has not finished yet and you are being denied the time off??

 

OK - we can play this "by the rules" (assuming that we have enough time left before the end of their financial year).

 

Put in for all of your remaining holiday - fill out the form and submit it.

 

If they then refuse to allow you to take your holiday - then it's down to them that you didn't get to take it, and you're in a much better position - ask them, as they are not allowing you to have your holiday, whether they would allow you to carry some of it forward and compensate you financially for the rest. You can point out that, by their contract with you, you are entitled to a certain amount of holiday - and they have denied this to you by refusing to allow you to take it, therefor (if you can't come to some amicable agreement) they will actually be in breach of contract.

 

If, however, there is not enough time left until the end of their year to be able to comply with their holiday booking rules, then it's likely that you've lost it.

 

Of course it's up to you how "Bolshy" you want to be with them - it's one thing to hack off the local electrical goods supplier - something different when it's your own employer!

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes, the holiday year isnt finished yet there is 6 weeks or so left, my employer says that they cant give us the holidays we are due because there is not enough staff left to cover your leave. But i would assume that it would probably be cheeper for them to just pay us for the loss of holiday days instead of the alternatives. That is, denying us holiday without compensation and therefore lowering staff morale and motivation to work or having to employ agency staff to cover us when we are off (which would probably cost more financially and time wise what with training)

Link to post
Share on other sites

This isn't your problem g83, it is bad management.

 

The choice is yours, you can (AND SHOULD), put in for your holiday, they must give it to you. They could make a compensation offer, but it is up to you whether you agree to that.

If they should make an offer of extra payment don't accept less than a minimum of double time, the day you are entitled to have off and being paid for, and payment for working on that day, otherwise they will be underpaying you.

 

If you should go for the extra payments (if it's offered), whatever you do, don't let them dither over it so that your time expires. Ensure that you put in for your holiday the minimum time allowed or longer if possible.

 

As VR has said in his post - put in for all your remaining holiday NOW, then you will have the full weight of the employment law behind you, and can discuss it further knowing that you can't loose that holiday.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...