Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi,   A few pointers from yesterday to take note of evris cpr 27.9 failed again so we should really make issue of this also their WX fail to comply with CPR so again we should take issue with their statement of truth  you cant get tort if you get damages under subsection 7 of CRA because its double recovery  - not sure what we think of this? however its the first time i saw the judges make reference to your non automatic rights from s49 which s54 and 57 assist with. We should start stating this specifically for claims as I think its much better than just 49 and 57 as we need to make it clear where our non automatic rights come from as 54 automatic frankly dont help  I have sent the claim form and defences to the admin email because I can’t upload them for some reason as it wont let me but thought this may help as its the first time we’ve taken tort to trial. although i think the DDJ was honestly struggling to understand some parts of the law because he was asking me about them and how he should interpret them, especially for the automatic. Will apply for transcript if you want it?
    • I decided on confrontation - which I hate.  Omg the arrogance of the driver.  They refused to say who had given them the alleged permission to park on the private land - unless I proved ownership.  I couldn't believe they could be so objectionable.   They advised they couldn't take public transport to work as they lived too far away.  They couldn't rent a local garage as none were available. I simply said that's their issue not mine. It was infuriating that this person had such misplaced entitlement.  However I decided to humour them and show them the title deeds.   They couldn't respond.  Although at this point they alleged some guy in a city up north - whose name they couldn't remember - gave permission!!    They then asked if they could buy the garages and land!! Yet can't afford to park on a meter !! They seemed to back down and agree to now park elsewhere.  I hope so. 
    • I've worked out the contractor invoiced apx 250k - Without adding vat to the invoices.  So based on above he should have added vat to all invoices once he reached 85k?  Obviously he had to pay his labourers - would those payments get taken off what he received?  Or it doesn't matter cos he invoiced for the high sum?
    • Greetings, I'm writing to seek assistance with an ongoing issue I'm having with Manchester Council.  I parked my car in a residential area behind Wilmslow Road to go purchase some food, not realizing it was a no-parking zone. I later received a letter stating I had failed to make the required payment, and the penalty had increased. I appealed the fine, explaining that I had parked there but never received the original Penalty Charge Notice (PCN), so I was unaware of the need to pay. However, the council's reply did not address my initial concern. Is there anything I can do in this situation? I admit to parking there, and I was willing to pay the original fine, but I don't think it's fair for them to demand a doubled amount when they failed to send me the initial PCN.  Any advice or guidance you can provide would be greatly appreciated. Thank you in advance for your assistance.   MK Document.pdf
    • If you look at some of the other debt related threads will see that one of the first things which will be asked will be for you to list out your debts in a brief chronological order, including date of debt, amount, creditor, amount outstanding, defaulted – yes/no – date of default, date of last payment made, have you acknowledged the debt at all to the creditors. That lot at least. I expect that my colleague @dx100uk will be along but will meet to know at least that information
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Money paid into account after closed??


Level103
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6001 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I recently had my account at Natwest (Student account) closed because of inactive usage for 6 months. They said that I owe them £1000 which is my student overdraft.

 

I said I agree to pay them £60 a month, and have been doing so for the last 3 months.

 

HOWEVER...

 

Today a large sum of my student loan got paid into the account that was closed; £1100 to be precise. I knew this was going to happen because the student loan company wouldn't allow me to change my bank details a week ago as it was too close to the time the transfer was going to be made into my bank.

 

How do I go about's retrieving the £1100 back? Does this now mean they owe the money?

 

It simply means the money has gone into the wrong account; and I can continue paying them £60 right?

 

Looking forward to your responses :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Similar thing happened with me and Barclays, ring up Student Loans and tell them that the money has been paid into the wrong account as the account has been closed.

 

The student loans company will have to re-call the money stating to Natwest that the money transaction was made by error.

 

You should get your money back.

 

Good luck.

 

IM

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that!

 

I'll give them a call, however you think I will be able to get the money over the counter at Natwest? By simply ringing them and telling them the payment went into the wrong account?

 

A

Link to post
Share on other sites

Grrrrrrrrrr

:mad:

 

Rang Natwest, who said the account wasn't fully closed, so I could make my repayments at £60 per month back.

 

I was then told the debt had been cleared by my student loan; which leaves me with no student loan.

 

I then said we had an agreement of £60 per month, not paying the full amount at once; which obviously happened when my loan went in.

 

They said he didn't know what to do, and that he had gone through.

 

I said I'll call student loan office and I did...

 

They then said that they cannot recall the payment unless it was their fault, but it wasn't...

 

How can I go about getting my student loan bank? Any letters I can send?

 

Also Natwest, said they will open my account back up in ten days maybe after review...Shall I just reopen my overdraft?

 

Grrrrrr :mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Level103

 

My advise was to speak with Student Loans only, not Natwest.

 

Ring Student Loans again and be firm with them explaining that you did contact them originally that the account was closed and you was told that it was too late as the money had already been sent to Natwest. Make it clear to Student Loans that you do not have access to that money and what are they expecting you to live on etc. They need to and should recall that money back. This really isn't a big deal for the student loans to deal with.

 

As far as Natwest are concerned, they've got their money, and it is highly unlikely that they will give you an overdraft again due to the previous issues.

 

Try again.

 

IM

Link to post
Share on other sites

UPDATE:

 

Student loan company said they won't give the loan a recall, so I'm left with £0 at the moment from my loan. :mad:

 

I'm going to write a letter to NatWest stating that we had an agreement on £60 per month, and they are going against there agreement by taking funds that are not to do with our agreement.

 

What do you all think?!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...