Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

HFC BANK Marbles card and CCA issues mr.p.


phatram
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4942 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 244
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi,

I recieved the same lackluster response to a CCA from HFC, it`s a joke BUT!!! they have also said that they DO NOT have my original CCA. They have been trying to phone me for days now and today i got to speak to them, the person i spoke to didnt know what a CCA was (or so he said) and he said that he could`nt understand why this was another complaint, so i explained that HFC are in default and are in summary default by admiting the do not have my original CCA, therfore can not enforce any agreement i have with them, i have also sent for SAR )Subject,Access,Request), they have a copy of my passport so i should have that by the end of feb, as for the CCA they are on the backfoot and when approx 16 days are over if i`m no further forward with my CCA request then i am sending a big complaint to the OFT/Trading Standards/ the Information Comissioners Office.

Do you know of what penalties the above groups can enforce as i have other issues, the mis-selling of PPI being one of them.?

 

Regards

Gordon

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is on its way to Marbles.

 

 

 

 

22/01/08

 

 

 

HFC Bank Ltd

PO Box 3607

BIRMINGHAM

B1 2XJ

 

 

 

 

Your Ref: xxxx/xxxx

 

 

Marbles ACC NO - xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx

 

 

 

 

Dear Ms Mulligan

 

Thank you for your letter of 16/01/08 in response to my legal request and complaint.

 

A I stated in my previous correspondence to Ms S Smith however, the document that HFC have so far provided is mostly illegible and nothing more than a pre-contractual Application Form; complete with application number. It contains no prescribed terms, APR, credit limit and/or terms and conditions. Therefore, contrary to the comments in your letter as well as in Ms Smith’s, this document does not comply with my legal request under The Consumer Credit Act, 1974 in any shape or form and neither does it represent a legally binding Agreement under the above Act.

 

At no point did I point out to Marbles that the account was “unenforceable”, as you have stated in your recent correspondence. Neither did I request that it should be “closed”. What I have in fact stated is that with the documentation you have so far supplied, the account remains in dispute which means that it is legally unenforceable on those grounds. At no point have I ever stated that I was ceasing payments to you either.

 

In your response, you also appear to have included some interesting interpretations of your legal obligations under The Consumer Credit Act, 1974, which have included your sending “a copy of the original credit agreement” upon request. As no such documentation has so far been supplied, not even under the Consumer Credit (Cancellation Notices and Copies of Documents) Regulations 1983, I am a little surprised that you are not more familiar with your legal responsibilities under the above Act. The signature box on the Application Form that you sent is merely a signature on a pre-contractual Application Form and is meaningless in terms of legal enforceability.

 

 

Please also note that as HFC are now in criminal default of a legal request, all payments may now be suspended until such times as you are able to comply.

 

For your information, the following rules apply to all disputed accounts under The Consumer Credit Act, 1974:

 

You/your agents/solicitors may not demand any payment on the account, nor am I obliged to offer any payment to you.

 

 

You/your agents/solicitors may not add any further interest or charges to the account.

 

 

You/your agent/solicitors may not pass the account to any third party.

 

 

You/your agent/solicitors may not register any information in respect of the account with any of the credit reference agencies.

 

Contrary to some of your other comments, whilst you remain in default of this request, you are unable to provide any signed authority to process my personal data under The Data Protection Act, 1998. A formal request for you to cease and desist from doing so will therefore be sent to you under Section 10 of the above Act, should this prove to be necessary.

 

I trust this clarifies my position and yours and look forward to your considered response in due course. Please note however, that all attempts to reach me by telephone will continue to be logged, before being rejected.

 

 

 

Yours sincerely,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good luck guys... HFC have now removed my 'phone numbers from their database !! Result. I'm still expecting to hear something in due course though, but whether they refer me to Weightmans/Restons or flog the acccount out remains to be seen....

 

All very quiet for now though...

 

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi PriorityOne,

If HFC have removed contact details, and if they flog the account, will you have to go through it all again with DCA`S or whom may have taken the account over? or can you pre-empt their next strike?, just with my opinion, i would think that because HFC have not fullfilled their legal obligations, then surely "IF" they did sell, and who ever it maybe that takes it over surely they`ve no hope at all of a resolution in this case as at the first attempt HFC were and have been in default from the outset, if that is the case they are very very silly in the presumption that they`ll get what they want without any legal compliance.

 

Regards Gordon

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they flog the account on... then I'll get the bubbly out, before writing to let them know that the account is still in dispute through the original request.

 

If HFC haven't got a CCA, then a DCA is not likely to have it either... otherwise there'd be no point in HFC farming out the account in the first place.

 

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi PriorityOne,

So basically their goosed, they seem to like arguing the toss about what we can and cannot except, stuffum,stick in there and we`ll all open the bubbly when they try and take us for granted.

I watch with interest as i`m in a similar postion.

 

Nice one

Regards gordon

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Received today,

 

Debt Litigation and Recovery Services

P.O. Box 13501, Birmingham, B2 2FB, Office Hours 9am-9pm Mon-Friday, 9am-3pm Saturday.

 

 

 

 

29th January 2008 Dear Mr xxxxxxxx

 

Client: HFC Bank Ltd

 

Credit Card Number: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx

 

Balance: £xxxx,xx

 

We have received instructions from the above named client to initiate formal debt collection proceedings for the unpaid debt as detailed above.

You must telephone our office within 72 hours to confirm the date on which full payment of the above balance will be made, or to make immediate payment via Debit or Credit Card. If paying by cheque your payment must be sent to us at the address above.

If there is a genuine reason why you cannot settle this debt immediately please call me now on freephone 0800 0121 417.

Failure to make full payment may result in legal proceedings being issued, and additional costs being charged to you.

Please do not underestimate the seriousness of this matter. We strongly recommend

 

that you act on this immediately.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

Recoveries Department

Please note calls may be monitored or recorded for training and security purposes.

 

Debt Litigation and Recovery Services is a trading name of D.L.R.S. Limited

 

Registered in England No 632204. Registered Office 288 High Street, Slough, Berkshire, SL1 1MB.

 

Consumer Credit Licence No. 270639

 

They still have not replied to my last letter, so what should I do now?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Phatram,

If i were in your position, i would send all copys of all correspondance to the above, what they are trying (in my view) is trying to put the frighteners on you, they have not fully responded with your request, so ask them again with all (as i said) documentation as proof of being sent, if they dont comply they are still in the

wrong, WHAT MAKE A PHONECALL SO THEY CAN CHARGE YOU MORE, EVEN THOUGH THEY HAVE FAILED TO HONOUR YOUR REQUEST, Ball hooks my friend, if you've got them.......then use them, if you dont have them then courage is best, stand firm and send the mail ( correspondance), they can not enforce without complying to your request, then take it from there.

 

Regards

Gordon

Link to post
Share on other sites

Received today,

 

Debt Litigation and Recovery Services

P.O. Box 13501, Birmingham, B2 2FB, Office Hours 9am-9pm Mon-Friday, 9am-3pm Saturday.

 

 

 

 

29th January 2008 Dear Mr xxxxxxxx

 

Client: HFC Bank Ltd

 

Credit Card Number: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx

 

Balance: £xxxx,xx

 

We have received instructions from the above named client to initiate formal debt collection proceedings for the unpaid debt as detailed above.

You must telephone our office within 72 hours to confirm the date on which full payment of the above balance will be made, or to make immediate payment via Debit or Credit Card. If paying by cheque your payment must be sent to us at the address above.

If there is a genuine reason why you cannot settle this debt immediately please call me now on freephone 0800 0121 417.

Failure to make full payment may result in legal proceedings being issued, and additional costs being charged to you.

Please do not underestimate the seriousness of this matter. We strongly recommend

 

that you act on this immediately.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

Recoveries Department

Please note calls may be monitored or recorded for training and security purposes.

 

Debt Litigation and Recovery Services is a trading name of D.L.R.S. Limited

 

Registered in England No 632204. Registered Office 288 High Street, Slough, Berkshire, SL1 1MB.

 

Consumer Credit Licence No. 270639

 

 

They still have not replied to my last letter, so what should I do now?

bump

Link to post
Share on other sites

Debt Litigation and Recovery Services

P.O. Box 13501,

Birmingham, B2 2FB,

Dear Sirs,

Thank you for your letter dated 29th January 2008, although I must admit to being a little surprised as to why you have felt the need to write to me.

My account with HFC is in dispute for reasons I will only discuss with HFC.

I have no problem enclosing copies of my correspondence to HFC so you can see for yourselves that you have no right to order me to do anything.

HFC have failed to comply with my CCA request and are now committing a criminal offence by their failure to do so.

I have nothing more to say on this matter to yourselves and remind you that I have done nothing wrong, unlike HFC!

Yours faithfully

How does that sound?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Again,

Have you reported them to/complained to trading standards, the OFT,commissioners information office or the FOS ? if not then i think you should do this ASAP, then you can attach the responses you recieve to you outgoing letter that you send to the people your dealing with now, as this would add a bit clout and should start getting you results.

 

Regards

Gordon

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suspect that these guys are part of HFC's in-house brigade.... as the addresses are very similar.

 

A brief letter ( by recorded delivery) pointing out that the account remains in dispute through non-compliance of a CCA request made on xx/xx/xx should be enough. No dealings on the 'phone though...

 

Mine are normally along the lines of :

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

Your Ref :

 

Thank you for your letter of xx/xx/xx. However, a legal request was made for a true copy of my Consumer Credit Agreement (Consumer Credit Act, 1974) on xx/xx/xx.

 

Until such times as your "client" is able to comply, the account remains in dispute and is legally unenforceable. I therefore suggest that you liaise with your "client" before contacting me again.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

 

If yours hasn't gone off by rec. delivery, then I suggest you re-send it.

 

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are no templates on here as far as I know. Situations will probably differ between people... so it's best to draft up your own complaint and post it up here for checking, if you're unsure.

 

Personally, I would hold fire for now.... and if you get any more grief, file a complaint then.

 

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've sent this,

 

06/02/08

 

 

 

 

 

Debt Litigation and Recovery Services

 

P.O. Box 13501,

 

Birmingham, B2 2FB,

 

ACCOUNT NUMBER xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

Thankyou for yourletter of 29th January 2008. However, a legal request wasmade for a true copy of my Consumer Credit Agreement (Consumer Credit Act,1974) on02/11/07.

 

 

 

Until such times as your "client" is able to comply, the account remains in dispute and is legally unenforceable. I therefore suggest that you liaise with your "client" before contacting me again.

 

 

 

 

 

Yours faithfully,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Phatram,

Yes this seems fine, below is a second response made by me to a lackluster CCA from HFC, you can use it as an example and edit as you see fit.

http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj161/nodrog1972/responsetoCCADaramola.jpg

http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj161/nodrog1972/responsetoCCAdaramolaa.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

This just arrived from DL AND R

Debt Litigation and Recovery Services

P.O. Box 13501, Birmingham, B2 2FB, Office Hours 9am-9pm Mon-Friday, 9am-3pm Saturday.

 

7th February 2008

Dear Mr xxxxxxxx WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Credit Card Number: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Balance : £xxx.xx

DLRS would like to offer you the opportunity to settle the outstanding debt on the above account at a reduced amount, which could represent as little as 60% of the current balance.

If you can pay a reduced settlement amount either in one lump sum, or by monthly repayments, please contact Debt Litigation and Recovery Services now on 0800 0121 417 to find out how much discount you are eligible for.

This offer is valid from 14 days from the date of this letter. After this period, this offer will lapse. If you are unable to take advantage of this short settlement offer, you must still call us immediately to make a satisfactory arrangement to repay this debt.

Please do not miss out on this genuine opportunity to settle this account at a substantial discount and help to resolve your financial difficulties.

Unfortunately, if we do not hear from you, we will have no option but to take Court proceedings against you to recover the full outstanding balance. This will add legal costs and further interest to the debt and, unless you settle the full amount, will result in a County Court Judgement being registered against you. We may then enforce this judgement by applying for: -

An Attachment of Earnings Order, to have repayments deducted directly from your salary and sent to the court by

your employer; . A Charging Order to have the debt secured against your property, or:

A County Court Bailiff to visit your home to seize goods to the value of the judgement debt.

This is your final opportunity to resolve this matter, your action will decide the outcome. Yours sincerely,

Recoveries Department

Please note calls may be monitored or recorded for training and security purposes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

60% off the current balance.... yes, I bet they would.... :cool: Wonder if I'll get one of these soon ?

 

You can probably ignore this one, as they've already had a bog off letter... If you don't want to though, I'll be back with an appropriate response later on, unless someone else beats me to it. I have to log off in while...

 

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...