Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Much appreciated for the ammendment. The snottier the better right!   What I am assuming is that this response is to be posted to Gladstones? However, I am seeing some users sending this as an email instead, which is a little confusing.  If we're happy with this response, what would you suggest is the best way to send it over to them (post/email), and is there anything additional I could include (if necessary)?  Thanks again! 
    • Hi @BankFodder I've read through other threads to better inform me of the process from here onwards. When I put in the MoneyClaim it gave me a claim number and it currently says to wait for the defendant to respond, they have until 7 August.  It seems their most likely action is to extend that a further 14 days to about 21 August - this hasn't happened yet, of course, as it is only 27 July but I'm anticipating that may be the case. So when the expected defence action is taken by EVRi I will need to submit DQ with these responses A1 - no mediation B - my contact details C1 - yes to the small claims track D1 - No.  If No please state why.  I believe the defence will provide some rebuttal to the particulars of claim and so I need to include details as to why the claim requires a hearing.  Is there some certain templated text I can include here or will it vary depending on what the defendant comes back with? I see on the form it mentions the following: Relevant reasons include that there are factual disputes which will need the judge to hear from witnesses directly or the issues are so complex they need to be argued orally.  Hoping to reach out to see what may be the most effective statements for D1 reasoning. E1-5 are pretty straightforward. I want to get ahead of things and be ready to take the next step so I appreciate what advice you may have about the DQ.  Thanks!  
    • Rachel Reeves is set to reveal a public finances shortfall of billions on pounds after a snap audit.View the full article
    • Hi What they have asked in what you have highlighted isn't unusual at all as Councils have numerous different departments that deal with specific different areas within that council. So if what you are asking in your DSAR is say specific to Housing Benefit, Council Tax Benefit, Planning Permission etc then just let them know that specific area. On the other hand if you want every bit of DATA they hold on you then simply tell then ALL DATA they hold on you it's them up to then to go through all depts to check for it. 
    • A growing number of couples are booking a content creators to capture their special day.View the full article
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Need some good advice


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6078 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I guess it's best to start at the beginning. In 1994 I very stupidly sold my house and with the proceeds opened a Craft shop with my wife. I would like to say that I didn't do it blindly because I discussed everything with my Bank Manager who thought it was a good idea and found premises in a Heritage village which attracted funds from various government agencies, the Tourist Board, Princes trust and various others. We were given forecasts and promises by the people who were put in charge of running the village. Everything thing looked absolutely rosy and the wife and I looked forward to being able to work together and do something that we enjoyed. We prepared a Business plan and formed a company, bought equipment and materials and for a couple of months everything looked good. Then came the winter and it was as though we had fallen into an abyss in fact we were lucky to have two customers a day. Never mind we thought; because we had expected a downturn in the winter and looked forward to the spring of 95. Well the spring arrived and so did the problems. The various agencies pulled out, the advertising stopped, the promised coach parties didn't arrive and by May the companies finances and my mental health were in pieces. It was apparent we had lost everything.

In short I had a mental breakdown and signed on; first on the sick and then as unemployed while my wife struggled to try and keep the business alive. I was with the Midland Bank and we were buying groceries with our cheque book and paying my benefit into the bank to repay it. Then the Bank started hitting us with bank charges claiming that there was a delay between the outgoing and the cash being paid in. I soon owed them about £1900 in total and they sent me a demand for immediate payment which of course I couldn't cover.

They closed my account after I contacted them and said I couldn't pay and agreed to stop the interest and let me pay them back at £10 a month. This was handled by a company called Brittania I believe; although it changed it's name somewhere along the line. To start with they gave me a paying in book and then later a plastic card which automated the system. I have never missed a payment but about six months ago I started getting phone calls saying that they were looking for me to pay more. I explained that I couldn't as I have never managed to find full time employment since I lost the business and basically do odd jobs. Suddenly Two weeks ago I was telephoned by a company called Rockwell who said that they had bought the debt and were looking for immediate repayment of the balance which now stands at a little over £1000. I explained that I could not do it and so then they changed tack and said they wanted a bigger repayment which again I explained I wasn't in a position to do. Then there was quite a few nasty things said but it became apparent they do not know my current address because all the original arrangements were made from the business address and they think I am still on the sick rather than doing odd jobs. I did not say anything to the contrary because the guy was being really unpleasant and I was panicking a bit. They said they would write to me but of course I wont receive it. I know it's not a huge amount of money but I am finding it very hard to deal with the situation. It brings everything hurtling back about that terrible time and I literally do have a panic attack if I think about it. What should I do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should start the process of reclaiming the charges. Do you have all your old statements? If not you need to send a SAR to the bank to get a breakdown of the charges applied (they may very well end up owing you money). A template for the SAR is here http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/516-1-data-protection-act.html You also need to spend some time reading through the FAQ's here http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/faqs-please-read-these/

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't offer any legal advice but I can do emotional. Calm down! I know it feels like the end of the world but it really isn't.

 

I bet someone will log on tomorrow and advise you to send a CCA letter to find out whether anyone in that chain has a properly executed agreement in order to enforce the debt and, furthermore, I bet that no bugger has one!

 

Please, give the site some time and help will come. I promise.

:p Wanting out of the red and into the pink! :p

 

If I've been nice please tip my scales. If I've been naughty, tip 'em twice! ;)

 

CURRENTLY CAGGING -

 

NatWest Bank - no response to S.A.R - (Subject Access Request), 40 days passed

 

Natwest CC - no response to CCA, 12+30 days passed. Calls continue, I ignore.

 

Sainsburys CCs x 2 - Current T&Cs rec'd in response to CCA request. Letter sent re lack of prescribed terms. Calls continue, mobile set to auto ignore.

 

Capital One - Copy application form rec'd in response to CCA. Letter sent re lack of prescribed terms. Standard final response received. Calls continue, I ignore.

Link to post
Share on other sites

LOL! See? Rory even beat me to it.

 

Ooooh, I love this place ;)

:p Wanting out of the red and into the pink! :p

 

If I've been nice please tip my scales. If I've been naughty, tip 'em twice! ;)

 

CURRENTLY CAGGING -

 

NatWest Bank - no response to S.A.R - (Subject Access Request), 40 days passed

 

Natwest CC - no response to CCA, 12+30 days passed. Calls continue, I ignore.

 

Sainsburys CCs x 2 - Current T&Cs rec'd in response to CCA request. Letter sent re lack of prescribed terms. Calls continue, mobile set to auto ignore.

 

Capital One - Copy application form rec'd in response to CCA. Letter sent re lack of prescribed terms. Standard final response received. Calls continue, I ignore.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Take Auntie's advise, dont let it get you down.....I felt like sh*t today, a son in panic mode, daughter in law, who thinks I am the dregs of the earth, a granddaughter I have never seen, no money, no way home and then a load of sh*t from DCA's,

 

Then I found this site, and all of a sudden, I'm not alone anymore

 

Keep your chin up.......All the best

Link to post
Share on other sites

It seeme to me that they're well out of time. The Midland? This was taken over by HSBC later on. Given the timescales, it appears they have sold a very old debt on to a 'hopeful' who can try and get something back from you.

 

Also, from the sounds of it, you were sold a 'dream', which would never materialise.

 

Be strong, stand up for yourself, and before you accept ANY claims against you, ask for cast iron proof of any claimed debt.

 

If you want to empower yourself, give them a two week time limit, and then start hounding them for information (dates, details etc).

 

If you find they are trying it on, ask when and from whom they got your personal information from.

 

Tide

Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem with reclaiing after all this time may be that the information on the account is not available. Bearing this in mind it would be worth while at the same time to dispute the account, you could do this through a CCA request to the company now dealing with the account. Basically when credit is granted in most instances there needs to be a credit agreement (in the case of the overdraft this would be a letter from the bank stating the amount of credit, the interest rate, charges and cancellation rights). The credit agreement is governed by the Consumer Credit Act, hence the term CCA request.

 

I would be very suprised if after all this time a copy of the agreement would exist. If there is no agreement the debt is not enforceable even in a court of law.

 

A template for a CCA request is here http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt/20758-creditors-dcas-letter-templates.html template N. I would advise that you send this via recorded delivery.

 

They have 12 working days from receipt of your request to supply a copy of the agreement after which they default on supply the agreement. Once they are in default you can legally withhold any payment on the account until a copy of the agreement is produced.

 

Please be aware that when you dispute a debt with a DCA they will in most instances send you threatening letters e.g. we may take you to court, etc. These are empty threats in nearly all instances and if you receive any such letters you should post back on here for reassurance. I appreciate that this can be a harrowing experience, but the more you know about your rights the less worried you will become.

 

Remember if there is anything you are not sure about or just need general support and reassurance please just post.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Because they have only communicated with me personally by telephone I do not have their address. They say that they have written to me and they are obviously using the business address that I had when things went wrong. Should I contact them and advise them of my present address?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you use this link just enter tha companies name (second box down) and it will give you the companies registered address http://www.esd.informationcommissioner.gov.uk/esd/search.asp

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The page will not load for me; maybe the server is down or busy. I will try again tomorrow. I am still not clear on whether or not I should advise them of my address? Is there anyway of doing this without letting them know where I live. I don't think I could face a visit from them right now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As long as you are picking up the mail and dealing with this then, while strictly not correct, I see no reason to change the address that they consider yours (although someone may correct me on this). In an ideal world you would but it avoids the possibility of harassment. It is highly unlikely that any home visits would be made anyway as this almost never happens.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have no access to mail sent to the previous address so it looks like I have no other option. The other thing that I wanted to pick your brains about is the CCA request. As this debt is best described as an unauthorised overdraft made up of mostly bank charges would the rules still apply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Overdrafts come under section 10 of the Consumer Credit Act.

 

10.—(1) For the purposes of this Act—

(a) running-account credit is a facility under a personal credit agreement whereby the debtor is enabled to receive from time to time (whether in his own person, or by another person) from the creditor or a third party cash, goods and services (or any of them) to an amount or value such that, taking into account payments made by or to the credit of the debtor, the credit limit (if any) is not at any time exceeded; and

(b) fixed-sum credit is any other facility under a personal credit agreement whereby the debtor is enabled to receive credit (whether in one amount or by instalments).

(2) In relation to running-account credit, " credit limit" means, as respects any period, the maximum debit balance which, under the credit agreement, is allowed to stand on the account during that period, disregarding any term of the agreement allowing that maximum to be exceeded merely temporarily.

(3) For the purposes of section 8(2), running-account credit shall be taken not to

exceed the amount specified in that subsection (" the specified amount") if—

(a) the credit limit does not exceed the specified amount; or

(b) whether or not there is a credit limit, and if there is, notwithstanding that it

exceeds the specified amount,—

(i) the debtor is not enabled to draw at any one time an amount which, so far as

(having regard to section 9(4)) it represents credit, exceeds the specified

amount, or

(ii) the agreement provides that, if the debit balance rises above a given

amount (not exceeding the specified amount), the rate of the total charge for credit increases or any other condition favouring the creditor or his associate comes into operation, or

(iii) at the time the agreement is made it is probable, having regard to the

terms of the agreement and any other relevant considerations, that the debit balance will not at any time rise above the specified amount.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

From the Consumer Credit Act 1974:

 

Facts. The manager of the C Bank agrees orally with D (an individual) to open a current account in D’s name. Nothing is said about overdraft facilities. After maintaining the account in credit for some weeks, D draws a cheque in favour of E for an amount exceeding D’s credit balance by £20. E presents the cheque and the Bank pay it.

Analysis. In drawing the cheque D, by implication, requests the Bank to grant him an overdraft of £20 on its usual terms as to interest and other charges. In deciding to honour the cheque, the Bank by implication accept the offer. This constitutes a regulated small consumer credit agreement for unrestricted-use, fixed-sum credit. It is a debtor-creditor agreement, and falls within section 74(1)(b) if covered by a determination under section 74(3).

 

Facts. F (an individual) has had a current account with the G Bank for many years. Although usually in credit, the account has been allowed by the Bank to become overdrawn from time to time. The maximum such overdraft has been is about £1,000. No explicit agreement has ever been made about overdraft facilities. Now, with a credit balance of £500, F draws a cheque for £1,300

 

Analysis. It might well be held that the agreement with F (express or implied) under which the Bank operate his account includes an implied term giving him the right to overdraft facilities up to say £1,000. If so, the agreement is a regulated consumer credit agreement for unrestricted-use, running-account credit. It is a debtor-creditor agreement, and falls within section 74(1)(b) if covered by a direction under section 74(3). It is also a multiple agreement, part of which (i.e. the part not dealing with the overdraft), as referred to in section 18(1)(a), falls within a category of agreement not mentioned in this Act.

 

Facts. Under an oral agreement made on 10th January, X (an individual) has an overdraft on his current account at the Y bank with a credit limit of £100. On 15th February, when his overdraft stands at £90, X draws a cheque for £25. It is the first time that X has exceeded his credit limit, and on 16th February the bank honours the cheque.

Analysis. The agreement of 10th January is a consumer credit agreement for running-account credit. The agreement of 15th-16th February varies the earlier agreement by adding a term allowing the credit limit to be exceeded merely temporarily. By section 82(2) the later agreement is deemed to revoke the earlier agreement and reproduce the combined effect of the two agreements. By section 82(4), Part V of this Act (except section 56) does not apply to the later agreement. By section 18(5), a term allowing a merely temporary excess over the credit limit is not to be treated as a separate agreement, or as providing fixed-sum credit. The whole of the £115 owed to the bank by X on 16th February is therefore running-account credit.

 

Facts. The G Bank grants H (an individual) an unlimited overdraft, with an increased rate of interest on so much of any debit balance as exceeds £2,000.

Analysis. Although the overdraft purports to be unlimited, the stipulation for increased interest above £2,000 brings the agreement within section 10(3)(b)(ii) and it is a consumer credit agreement.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am just about to send off my request for a copy of the CCA however I am still a bit confused. Rory you say overdrafts come under section 10 of the consumer credit act and then give examples which fall within section 74. The template for requesting the CCA refers to Consumer Credit Act 1974 (Sections 77−79) should I amend this and if so to what? Sorry for being a pain but I am not clear what to do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No you don't need to amend it. The request for a copy of the agreement falls under sections 77-79 of the Act which are to do with the duty of a creditor to give information (e.g. a copy of the agreement) for fixed sum credit, running account credit and hire agreements.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, as it re-affirms your position.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...