Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • he may be using a different name but cars and vans/vans and cars it’s all the same Gerard Bird/Gerry Bird/G Bird aka Gurdip Singh Virdi He is still doing the same thing, operating from the same premises at 101a Longford, I’m guessing during Covid they got the great idea to rip people off remotely and charge people for the pleasure. they now deliver cars that are shocking quality and refuse to even accept the issues you find. Then Gaslight you into thinking your the problem and call you an idiot for buying a used car instead of a new one. Buyers beware this thread is vitally important     
    • Changes to China's state secrets law requires internet firms to monitor information shared by users.View the full article
    • The only way to verify whether there is any financial reward for the management is seeing the agreement. That would be required during disclosure IF court proceedings went ahead... Unless you could bring pressure to bear and get a copy?
    • god they've got at you haven't they. told you all the usual utter BS. a CCJ vanishes from your credit file on it's 6th B'Day regardless to being paid off or not or paying or not. same with any debt with a registered defaulted date - it vanishes from your file on the DN's 6th B'day regardless. creditfix are Knightsbridge, (they renamed) there are 100's of threads here on Knightsbridge, if i remember rightly 2 of the directors of a certain very big IVA provider were struck off for embezzling £1m's out of debtors. pers i'd stop paying now.  end of . just ignore them all. 99% of your debts are to utterly powerless DCA's and probably were never owed in the first place only goes to firm up my belief from post one..you got had blind. its very easy to deal with the debts even those with CCJ's. can you copy and paste what you credit file says regarding the IVA please?   
    • The airline says it is investigating reports that customers can view other passengers' personal information.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Helping my Mum against Abbey


lee_s
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5950 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All

 

Just would like some advice/pointers - or just some encouragement that I am going along the right lines.

 

Couple of years ago, I succesfully got £4K ish back from Abbey by following guidelines here on this website. My mum was widowed 2 yrs ago and is on minimum income ie: small pension and since reduction in income she started to go into the red which Abbey who have penalised her quite heavily. She's not in the best of health and has a habit of sticking her head in the sand but after a while of me nagging she finally agreed to start a new account elsewhere and let me help her reclaim her charges. Basically the small amount she had coming in was being swallowed up by Abbey charges.

 

Intial letters sent to Abbey and standard responses came back.

Got the info finally with details of charges and asked for these back.

Same std letter from Abbey saying they wouldn't refund, so CC claim started.

Luckily, she didn't have to pay the court for application due to low income. Claim was filed and Abbey responded with their standard defence.

Then they applied for a stay which was granted without any option to have our say.

We've now submitted the N244 and again due to her financial situation didn't have to pay a fee. We did it on the grounds of hardship + other arguments made here ie: human rights etc.

She's had a letter back from court saying a hearing has been set for 6th December and assumption is that a copy of her application and witness statement have been sent to Abbey as well. (she received a duplicate of her original application along with the notice of hearing)

 

My thoughts are the court know why we've applied to have stay lifted. Copies would have been sent to Abbey's Solicitors as well.

 

I have asked her to complete an income /expenditure sheet showing current financial status (with copies of pension details/benefits) to prove she is finding it hard to get by.

 

Do we need to submit anything further to the court prior to hearing ?

 

At what point would abbey start making an offer to settle. Is it prior to the full blown hearing - as opposed to lifting of a stay ?

 

Thanks in advance for any advice you can give.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, what did the notice of hearing say, is it an allocation hearing or a hearing for the lifting of the stay?

 

something you could try is an email to [email protected], detailing everything re charges and that you mother is a real hardship case, only has pension to live on etc etc, attach the spreadsheet and invite them to make you an offer to settle :-)

Lula

 

Lula v Abbey - Settled

Lula v Abbey (2) - Settled

Lula v Abbey (3) - Stayed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Lula,

 

It's a hearing to try and get the stay lifted, which is due next week.

 

Court hasn't put any directions on the hearing notice, but I assume that the application which we put together has been sent to Abbey. The application submitted by us was mainly around the hardship / ill health points but followed up with all the other reasons as well.

 

My mum has had no contact from Abbey apart from stock/standard letters, none specifically from legal side of Abbey.

 

At this point in time my mum would be open to an offer. This sort of thing plays havoc with her nerves. I am doing the leg work for her so she has nothing reallly to worry about but all the same its not nice for her.

 

Thanks Lula for your advice, I'll try emailing the contact above to see whether they're willing to play ball.

Lee

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update - went to court today to get stay lifted. The judge said that before we started that she could not accept a request to lift the stay, but was quite irritated and annoyed that Abbey were pursuing the overdraft balance when it was clear that the amount was in dispute. She also said she couldn't believe that the account had been handed to a debt collection agency when the application for removal of stay was done on the basis of hardship. Wanted to know why Abbey thought this was a good move.

Abbey solicitor didn't look very comfortable at this point and blamed the internet for the problem of overloading Abbey with claims !!

None of the other arguments appeared to carry any weight ie: Human Rights, Balance of conveniece, UTCCR etc.

One result though is Abbey have been ordered to stop debt collection action and any further breach will give grounds to have stay lifted.

Tried the man at Ashursts and says he will look into it.

Fingers crossed because I want my Mum to have a worry free Christmas !

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is quite an achievement getting them to stop chasing the debt. Its very unlikely at this stage that stays will be lifted with the test case so soon.

 

It would also be good to report them to FSA for breach of the waiver conditions. They have an obligation to deal with claims of hardship promptly and chasing a disputed debt would certainly constitute a breach.

 

You could also go to the Ombudsman as they are still dealing with claims involving hardship.

 

All the best

 

Zoot :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Happy New Year all,

 

Just by way of a quick update, since the court's intervention the Abbey have stopped harassing my mum for repayment although it hasn't stopped them adding interest each month.

 

I took Lula's suggestion and contact Ashursts to see if they were willing to help especially as my mum is truly suffering financial hardship. After emails backwards and forwards, they have responded and said the Abbey doesn't believe my Mum is suffering financial hardship. They also said that Abbey were being sympathetic by not chasing the debt ... seemed to forget the fact that they had no choice ... the court ordered them to leave my Mum alone.

 

I am determined to get this fixed for my mum and will be pressing ahead with the Financial Ombudsman and by whatever other means available.

 

We gave a true breakdown of income and expenditure and it clearly shows she doesn't have enough to live on. (Pension only - essential expenditure like food, electric, council tax )

 

How they can determine she isn't suffering is beyond me. Wouldn't be so bad but they owe her 5 times what she owes them.

 

Can anyone please point me to the right place to progressing this with the financial ombudsman and how you go about coimplaining to FSA about the breach of the waiver ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update:

 

I've registered a complaint with the Financial Ombudsman.

 

They've confirmed that banks are supposed to be looking at progressing hardship claims as it was a condition of the waiver agreement. They've agreed to take this up on our behalf. I've passed them all the details but in a nutshell :

 

Income Expenditure sheet showing finances

Fact that County Court waived all Court Fees due to little income

Copy of Letter that went to Abbey 5 months ago saying my mum was having problems due to charges, explaining ill health and little income and pleading to get charges back so she could clear overdraft

Copy of application to remove stay on grounds of financial hardship

 

Interesting enough, the bank is supposed to let people know that if they are not happy with their decision that you have the right to escalate this with the Financial Ombudsman as an independant adjudicator. Their letter said nothing of the sort so they've broken the rules on this point as well. I'll will be interested to see how they wriggle out of this one.

 

I'll keep you all posted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...