Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Robinson Way & Ebay fees


LordLee

Recommended Posts

Just a quick question...

 

I was in dispute with Ebay over some fees (under £40).

Ebay were uncooperative

They past the debt to Robinson Way.

After pulling my hair out with Robinson Way's incompetence I just decided to pay my ebay fees directly to ebay and unsuspended my account. Just put it all down to a bad experience.

 

I'm now free to use Ebay again.

 

But RobisonWay are still pursuing me for their 'additional costs'.

 

Where do i stand with these charges?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The OFT Guidelines on Debt Collection are quite clear on such costs.

 

Examples of unfair practices:

 

a. Claiming collection costs from a debtor in the absence of express contractual or other legal provision

b. misleading debtors into believing they are legally liable to pay collection charges when this is not the case, for example, when there is no contractual provision

c. not giving an indication in credit agreements of any charges payable on default

d. applying unreasonable charges, for example, charges not based on actual and necessary costs

e. applying charges which are disporportionate to the main debt

 

You need to check the Ebay UA (I can't do it on this computer), to see whether colection charges are mentioned. In any case, d. and e. above probably apply even if the others don't, though you don't say how much RW are claiming.

 

I have previously successfully argued in similar circumstances (when the original debt has been paid to a creditor), that no contract exists between the debtor and the DCA. The creditor having accepted the overdue amount, it would seem that the charges are not theirs, and the DCA should look to their client, with whom they have a contract, for their costs. If you really want to rub salt in, tell them that if they believe that it is acceptable to levy a charge where no contract exists, the fee for your letter is £50, and would they be kind enough to send a cheque.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
i paid my ebay fees of £29. Robinson way seem to think i still owe them £8. And constantly pester with phone calls and aggressive staff.

 

do you, ScarletPimpernel, know exactly what procedure i should proceed with? or does anyone know?

 

 

all this for £8? ha ha ha!!!!

 

talk about desperate! dear me RW, what a bunch of leeches!!

post office WON 12/11/06

 

abbey.LBA sent 30/10/06.MCOL claim submitted 8/11/06.allocation questionnaire sent 16/12/06.schedule of charges sent 16/12/06.WON

 

2nd abbey claim SAR sent 3/1/07.WON.complaint letter sent 18/1/08

 

alliance and Leicester.WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd send a letter telling them that as far as you can see the fees they claim you owe them are contrary to the OFT guidelines, and that in any case you have no contractual relationship with them, so they should look to their client, with who they do have a contractual relationship, for their fees. Tell that you will not enter into any further correspondence in the matter, and that you will charge a handling fee of £50 for any further letters they send; the sending of any more drivel will constitute their acceptance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...