Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

No Signed agreement


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5386 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have two defaults registered against my name by HSBC and MBNA. I wrote to both company under s77/78 requesting copies of signed agreements. Both banks wrote back saying "We are unable to provide copy of your original application form and as your account was sold to Link Financial we are unable to provide a copy of statement.

 

I wrote to Link Financial asking for a copy of agreement etc and served them s10 and 12 notice. It has been over a month I heard nothing from them. I wrote to Financial ombudsment and they said they have asked the Banks to investigate further which could take 8 weeks or more.

 

Now I am stuck, I am unable to get a secure loan because of these two defaults.

 

Can someone please advice me what action should I take now to get these defaults remove.

 

How can I get these two defaults removed quickly?

 

Thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome to the site.

You have followed the correct procedures that a County Court Judge would want to see before listening to any claim.Have you written to the CRAs requesting that the information be removed ? CRAs always try to pass the buck...they have no legal authority but will say they cannot remove without the creditors permission.So tell them you want it removed they will say they will contact the creditors for an answer.It wont be the original creditor but the dca who bought the debt and re-registered in their name.They will write to the owners of the debts and ask for permission....the permission is likely to be refused so can be seen as non compliance to your S10......because by refusing permission they are still processing.

The FOS are stretched to the limit as we speak...If this were me I would file a claim in the small claims court for non compliance together with a compensation request.(I have the same claim in court myself)....Basically you are asking for an order to force the creditors to remove the adverse information and cite non compliance of s10 under the Data Protection Act. (you can state that you have not been given written confirmation that they will comply ) My claim was filed on an N1 it requests compensation at the Courts discretion and also removal of adverse info.

You can lodge and have it served in a couple of days.

There is a chance that they will remove it.

Make your request to the Cras quickly You may have your response within 2 weeks...which will run alongside your County Court Claim. If it does reach allocation stage I would ask in your form that the court considers ordering the data controller him/Herself to appear at any hearing. It should not get this far.

There is no fast way to deal with this it has to involve the Court or the FOS....They know the Fos is stretched

However you should bear in mind if you do go the Court route then the FOS will leave it to the Court.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have contacted both Credit reference Agencis and both replied saying they will not remove the information because they verified it with the DCA. I asked them for evidence but they did not send any and even refused to reply.

 

I have never applied to Court, is there anyone can give me a sample claim form please.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can claim damages for injury to your credit rating as per the case of

Kpohraror v Woolwich Building Society - [1996] 4 All ER 119 which i have attached a copy

 

there are many different views on how to deal with default removal, however none are very fast

 

you would need to issue a N1 no matter and take this through the county court as CRAs always claim "because they have been told by the creditor its right then its gotta stay"

 

Regards

 

paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

after four months I have received a reply from Link Financial stating that "Your MBNA account was assigned to us in Jan 2003. The responsibility to manage the information placed with the CRA by MBNA was also passed at the same time of purchasing and the decision to process your information to CRA is not based solely on automatic means. Therefore, we not believe we are in breach of our responsibility under the Act with regards to your details"

 

Please can someone advice me what reply I shall send them before proceeding to County Court. It will be appreciated if a sample letter is provided.

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can claim damages for injury to your credit rating as per the case of

Kpohraror v Woolwich Building Society - [1996] 4 All ER 119 which i have attached a copy

 

there are many different views on how to deal with default removal, however none are very fast

 

you would need to issue a N1 no matter and take this through the county court as CRAs always claim "because they have been told by the creditor its right then its gotta stay"

 

Regards

 

paul

 

Hi can you please send a copy of Kpohraror v Woolwich Building Society - [1996] 4 All ER 119.

 

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...