Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yup, well so far they have lied to me about responding to a CCA,  are threatening me with a default notice that they don't have, produced a knocked up version of my NOA, sent me 29 pages of spew for an agreement. No wonder they pay 5 p in the pound for that crap.
    • Paragraph 2. I think there should be further down and also you should make the point that the payment to was made unilaterally and without the imposition of any conditions. Paragraph 3 – this is unnecessary because you are not claiming as an entitled third-party. This worries me because it makes me feel that you haven't fully read around because this is a paragraph which you would include where you were suing EVRi as a beneficial third party because you had actually made your contract with Packlink or some other broker. I think you need to revisit and do some more reading. I'm afraid I have a sense that you have simply copied this from somebody else's witness statement without understanding that it wasn't necessary. Please can you post the amended draft. Other than the suggestions above, it looks okay – but let's see it again for a further appraisal. In terms of the evidence, parties bundle, I think it might be an idea to start off with the correspondence with EVRi and then go onto the other evidence. You will have to amend the index page accordingly. You could shorten this bit. Take 19 is pretty well blank and you may as well miss it out also, there seems to be some repetition of emails and the email chain. I think will be worth going through and getting rid of duplicates if you can. 49 pages is a bit long and it would be a good idea to try and reduce the number. I have a feeling that 50 pages as the County Court limit anyway. The judge will be happier with you if the bundle is smaller. Maybe you could reduce the size of some of the images or messages et cetera. You have got several messages which straddle onto a second page so that things like sign off information and standard confidentiality information become orphans. A bit of manipulation and they could be joined to their parents I think. Page 31 as an example. So is page 19. You may only be up to shorten the whole thing by 56 pages – but I think it would be a good idea. 56 pages is, after all, 10%. If you can do more then so much the better
    • Investment by Dutch brewing giant will create 1,000 new jobs and reopen dozens of closed pubsView the full article
    • Qantas agrees to pay millions to settle lawsuit accusing it of selling tickets to cancelled flights.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Nationwide - Response


stubbarama
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1889 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I received my response letter from the Nationwide this morning, merely stating if I told them what charges I was on about they would look into it.

 

As I had used the template letter on Bank Action Group so I thought it was very clear and to the point, I rang them and despite not geting the person who originaly sent the letter, spoke to a young girl who was more than aware of the situation and fobbed me off with the " You have to ask the branch for them " as I pointed out to her my original letter was addressed to the branch and why should I have to do it again ? She became very anoid and cited that she was going over the same thing again and again, well if I dont get a suitable answer Im going too !!

 

I asked to speak to a supervisor/manager and was told they were all in a meeting, so I asked for her to get someone to call me when they were out. She put me on hold and then came back saying they were looking for my letter. Then came back saying that I had ask for a list of charges, not a list of statements. I was getting a bit hett up now and ponted out she was being a bit picky. but still she went on.

 

So finaly I said to get a manager to call me, when voila one appeared out of no where, and said she would call the branch for me, and get them to liaise with me. I told her that I wanted a list of charges and not a chat and she agreed.

 

Dont think this is going to be easy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send in £10 with a letter to their head office saying the following:

 

Dear Sirs,

 

Please send me all of the information which I am entitled to under the Data Protection Act 1998. I require you to enclose copies of all bank statements.

 

Your faithfully

 

They have 40 days to comply (which they will, quite happily). After that add up all the charges and send them a letter threatening court within xxx days if the money isn't returned.

Robertxc v. Abbey - £3300 Settled in full

Robertxc v. Clydesdale - £750 Settled in full

Nationwide v. Robertxc - £2000 overdraft wiped out, Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Style Card - Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Abbey (1) - Data Protection Act action. £750 compensation

Robertxc v. Abbey (2) - Data Protection Act action. £2000 compensation, default removed

 

The opinions on this post are those of Robertxc and not necessarily the opinions of the group and do not constitute sound legal advice. You are advised to seek professional legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Robert, I already sent Daves template letter out of the libary. Therfore asking for the list of charges.

 

I pointed this out to her, but she didnt want to know. I ended up talking to a team leader who dealt with it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, are they sending the info or not?

Robertxc v. Abbey - £3300 Settled in full

Robertxc v. Clydesdale - £750 Settled in full

Nationwide v. Robertxc - £2000 overdraft wiped out, Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Style Card - Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Abbey (1) - Data Protection Act action. £750 compensation

Robertxc v. Abbey (2) - Data Protection Act action. £2000 compensation, default removed

 

The opinions on this post are those of Robertxc and not necessarily the opinions of the group and do not constitute sound legal advice. You are advised to seek professional legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think this is a good illustration of why it's important to follow the Data Protection request route. They have an entire department set up to deal with DPA requests, and you'll find that it's an entirely straightforward process to get all your information out of them. Nationwide will dend you a hefty ring bound folder with absolutely everything in it, provided you ask for it is the proper way, through a formal data protection request.

Robertxc v. Abbey - £3300 Settled in full

Robertxc v. Clydesdale - £750 Settled in full

Nationwide v. Robertxc - £2000 overdraft wiped out, Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Style Card - Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Abbey (1) - Data Protection Act action. £750 compensation

Robertxc v. Abbey (2) - Data Protection Act action. £2000 compensation, default removed

 

The opinions on this post are those of Robertxc and not necessarily the opinions of the group and do not constitute sound legal advice. You are advised to seek professional legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope they dont give me everything. :D

 

Could take a while to sort through 6 years worth of info.

 

I did a quick tally up on the likely charges and it seems to be approx 2100 (A few statements missing) and interst of £700.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Provided you document every charge, you shouldn't have too much trouble getting it all back

Robertxc v. Abbey - £3300 Settled in full

Robertxc v. Clydesdale - £750 Settled in full

Nationwide v. Robertxc - £2000 overdraft wiped out, Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Style Card - Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Abbey (1) - Data Protection Act action. £750 compensation

Robertxc v. Abbey (2) - Data Protection Act action. £2000 compensation, default removed

 

The opinions on this post are those of Robertxc and not necessarily the opinions of the group and do not constitute sound legal advice. You are advised to seek professional legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have received the statements this morning, With a letter stating that in Feb 2001 I got a refund of £25 and that it was the Nationwides policy to only refund on a first offense ( despite it not being the first ).

 

Should I send them back a letter asking for the total amount or go straight to the online claim ? if I do send them a letter can I ask for the 8% Apr ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you're going to go to court, it's best to have your facts right. I suggest you get all your previous statements and add it all up. Then when you start your claim you can provide a detailed list of every charge. A little bit of patience and preparation at this stage is definitley worth while. Also, when you go back with your detailed list, you'll be sending a messager that you're dead serious.

Robertxc v. Abbey - £3300 Settled in full

Robertxc v. Clydesdale - £750 Settled in full

Nationwide v. Robertxc - £2000 overdraft wiped out, Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Style Card - Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Abbey (1) - Data Protection Act action. £750 compensation

Robertxc v. Abbey (2) - Data Protection Act action. £2000 compensation, default removed

 

The opinions on this post are those of Robertxc and not necessarily the opinions of the group and do not constitute sound legal advice. You are advised to seek professional legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should now total it all up and ask for it back first and let them know the basis on which they should return the money.

When you say 8% interest, what are you referring to?

 

If you are claimimg money which the banks have taken from you unlawfully, then you certainly have grounds for claiming interest.

 

However, if their charges had resulted in or were included in an overdraft, then they would have been charging yo interest on the value of the charges. This would be the interest which you should be claiming

I think that the 8% you are referring to is the County Court rate. But you only claim that when you have started your action.

 

Actually, I think that there is a good basis for saying that there is an implied term of mutuality or reciprocity in all bank contracts. If this would be the case then as the seizure of money by the bank amounts to unauthorised borrowing by them and that therefore they should pay you interest on the the sum at their own unauthorised borrowing rate. However, this gets us into contraversial waters and you might prefer simpoy to go in for a quick kill. :twisted:

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Nationwide have 4 days left to acknowledge the claim, and after speaking with Gary Clay they are more than likely to post it at the last minute.

 

Just wondering whether if they do acknowlege the claim, we can get some press coverage on the back of them backing down at the last minute against Gary ? see if they will actualy get it into court this time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm just about to send them a letter requesting the return of my £725. However you might be interested to know just got of the phone with a Sarah Watson of Nationwide, and she called the charges a FINE.

 

When I pointed out to her that she had just called it a fine, she become very flustered

Link to post
Share on other sites

So have you tried to apply for judgment?

Try it and see if the system lets you or whether you have to wait until tomorrow or Monday.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yum yum!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont suppose you have a recording of the call do you ?

 

They probably will have. You can request under DPA

The law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich as well as the poor to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal bread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Q. I am entering judgment by default but a message comes up stating you cannot enter judgment by default at this time, why does it say this?

 

A. This is because the defendant's time for filing a response has not yet passed. If their deadline fell on a weekend or bank holiday they are given the next working day to respond. It may also be because the defendant has filed an acknowledgement of service, which gives them an extra 14 days to respond.

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1889 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...