Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • she and  johnson need to be kicked off the taxpayers credit card - for starters I'm certain there is cause - taking up 'jobs' when they shouldn't, bringing the nation into disrepute with their antics .. I'm sure it would be a very popular act from a new labour guv
    • Please have a look at this draft letter. It is modelled on yours but I have cut out a load of the unnecessary information. Also, the responsibility lies with the finance company because the vehicle was brought on hire purchase. You send it to them and a copy to big motoring world.   Let us know if there's anything that you disagree with, which is wrong, which you think should be added
    • According to Alastair Campbell on Twitter, anti-Le Pen parties are pointing to RN's fiscal policies and saying they'll cause a 'Truss-style market meltdown'. Liz Truss charged taxpayers for Amazon Prime subscription - Mirror Online WWW.MIRROR.CO.UK The subscription costing £95 gives the ex-PM free shipping from the retail giant, as well as the ability to stream films and TV shows such as My Fault...  
    • Thank-you @BankFodder, your statement is a correct understanding of my position and I agree, it is actually really what I was looking for in starting this thread, as I too believed that the maximum I could claim for is that which I sold it for, even though this was substantially below market value at the time. And so, this sold value is what I shall be claiming for + the other expenses. @dx100uk I get your point, but this is just not what I want to expose myself to. Unfortunately I was one of the unlucky ones to have my details stolen in the Peoples Energy hack, and in 2020 I discovered that those details had been used to take out car insurance, and that the insured was then involved in a collision and my details were dragged through the mud. Despite Aviva cancelling the claim and treating as though it never were, even though I have the letters from them to say that they have removed this claim from the insurance database, I still get refused insurance and credit products to this day until I send across the letter from Aviva which explains that I was a victim of fraud. So you'll forgive me for not jumping up and uploading my data to a server utility for which I have no control over its retention policy, or where the server is located globally, its legal jurisdiction, or its security protocols.
    • Speeding (Revised 2017) – Sentencing (sentencingcouncil.org.uk)  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Urgent help needed


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6072 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I know I have probably dug a hole for myself slightly, but please help me dig my way out!

 

I gave notice on a shorthold tenancy and an end date was agreed. We moved out, but because the landlord had been quite difficult on occasion I witheld the last months rent.

 

The landlord attended the property about 2 weeks before the end of the tenancy and agreed that as long as the house was cleared of my possessions when we left and the carpets were cleaned they were happy with the state of the property.

 

We arranged that as they would be away when the tenancy ended, we would call them with details of the carpet cleaning company, and they would let them into the property.

 

They have now replaced the carpet and sent me a bill for £300, it was rubbish carpet, but they are claiming it is beyond cleaning (which I don't think is true). They claim that it was new when I moved in, I have been there for 21 months

 

What can I do?

PLEASE READ THE FAQ's

Link to post
Share on other sites

Was an inventory taken at the beginning of the tenancy?

 

Ask Landlord to see receipts and the three quotes which he should have taken before the work was done.

All help is merely my opinion only - please seek legal advice if you need to as I am only qualified in SEN law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then I would send a letter refuting hsi allegations and asking for the inventory, receipt for the carpet prior to you moving in, receipt for the carpet that has just been bought and the three quotes he had taken to show this was a competitive price.

 

Basically, all he can do is take you to court which wouldmean you would have to defend the action, but he would have to provide evidence to the court. Do you by any chance have any recent photos which would show the state of the carpet?

All help is merely my opinion only - please seek legal advice if you need to as I am only qualified in SEN law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Tiglet

 

I don't think I have any recent photos of the carpet, but it really wasn't that bad. When the carpets were cleaned a year ago after a fire they were in a worse state than they are now and came up perfectly.

 

When I moved in I had to have the carpets fumigated for fleas, which the landlord paid for.

 

Although the final months rent wasn't paid and they seemed ok with this, they are now threatening to take me to court for breach of contract as well as the carpet, could they do this?

PLEASE READ THE FAQ's

Link to post
Share on other sites

To be honest, I'm not sure about the breach of contract.

 

However, it would be up to the landlord to prove the problem, not you.

 

Plus, if you had to get the carpet fumigated, I can't see that it could have been that new.

 

Do you still have your contract?

All help is merely my opinion only - please seek legal advice if you need to as I am only qualified in SEN law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK.

 

Ask in your letter which part of your contract they deem you to have broken as you have made a verbal agreement about the last month's rent.

 

I think that should be OK, but it's not really my area, if you see what i mean, so hopefully a legal bod who knows about tenancy law will pop along and give some more advice.

All help is merely my opinion only - please seek legal advice if you need to as I am only qualified in SEN law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The landlord might sue for arrears of rent, if you have not paid the rent in full up to the date of the termination.

 

You don't say why failed to pay the rent. Why? By not paying you are exposing yourself to a lawsuit by the landlord for the rent arrears, a claim which you will seemingly have no defence to.

 

That's an open invitation to him to sue you, give that he wants £300 for the carpet, too.

 

You could try to negotiate a payment, to be made "in full and final settlement of all the landlord's claims against the tenant arising under the tenancy agreement", agreeing it in writing, and using those exact words. Try offering the amount of the arrears.

 

 

 

Advice & opinions on this forum are offered informally, without any assumption of liability. Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified and insured professional if you have any doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...