Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello I hope someone can give me some advice here, as I am at a bit of a loss on how to proceed. This relates to alleged offences under the RTA. Yesterday I received a notification from the local police of intention to prosecute for the following offences: 1 driving without due care and attention 2 failing to stop at a road traffic accident 3 failing to report a road traffic accident At this stage they have only asked me to say whether I was the driver at the time or not and provided a blank sheet of paper to give information about the incident. Going by the location (just round the corner from where I live) I can only imagine this relating to one recent incident, which wasn't actually an accident but more of a road rage event. I was driving past someone unloading or working next to his lorry which had stopped in the road. I wasn't going fast or anything, while I went by lorry man turned around and punched and kicked my car whilst going past him. I stopped and got out and wanted to know what he thought he was doing punching and kicking my car. He then hurled some verbal abuse at me, swearing and he was quite aggressive. I still didn't know what his problem was and said I would report him to his company for threatening behaviour and vandalism for punching my car. I got my phone and tried to take a photo of his lorry and number plate but at that moment he came right at me, still shouting and swearing, so I was worried he may hit me next, as he already punched my car. I thought if the guy hits me I will come off second best, so I decided to retreat. I quickly got back into my car and left. When I checked my phone later the photo I tried to take was blurred and useless, so I thought it was pointless to report the incident to the police, as the guy would not be traceable. Over that I forgot about it until I got the letter yesterday in the post. This is the only thing I believe this can relate to, but I have no idea based on what the three above allegations come from There was no road traffic accident, more of a road rage incident. So I am at a loss what to do. I have 28 days to respond. Should I just say yes I was the driver and was there and see what happens next, or should I already make a written statement on the attached piece of paper they sent me and send that with it ? Is there anyone here who would have a rough idea what to do next ? I tried my legal advice line through my Union, but they have sent me from pillar to post, now say it needs to go to a different department again and that would be chargeable as the RTA comes under Criminal Law. So any advice would be appreciated Many Thanks
    • So a quick update got bounced around two different departments and managed to speak to a DVLA bod , explained the situation and they could see the overlap and that DD payments had been made from Feb , also no formal remiders prior , they gave me a number for the legal dept who I am calling this morning to see what they can do in terms of the SJP notice , still have time to submit this online.  Will update after my chat this morning 
    • Also, I am trying to understand how invoicing a large sum in a 6m period becomes tax fraud?   Is it because if he had invoiced over the £85k threshold he should have been obligated to charge vat?  Which would have meant hmrc would have benefited from the vat amount? So by not charging it Hmrc have lost out on £s revenue?  Is that what makes it tax fraud? So as a self-employed contractor, let's say he invoiced one Co for 200k.  Should he have charged vat on the full 200k (£40k)? Or just on the sum above the threshold (£23k)?  And that by not charging vat, he has knowingly withheld tax £s from Hmrc? And is the payer complicit ?
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Clamping On Private Land


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6070 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there,

 

I'm a 17 year old who go's to college in central Brighton - there is a staff car park which staff display a permit to use. If a car is parked in there which doesn't display a permit the caretakers clamp the car and release it for free after 5pm (trying to be a nuisance since lessons finish at 4).

 

They are not SIA licenced and thus I would assume, reading from the citizens advice bureau's guide, that they are comitting a criminal offence by clamping my car.

 

However on confronting the caretakers they said that it was legal to clamp vehicles on private land so long as they don't charge for the release. This sounds dubious but there is nothing about this on the web that I could find.

 

Could anyone comment on the legality of this matter? (If you could it would help a cash strapped student who would otherwise have to pay £6 a day to park in a parking bay opposite the college..!)

 

Regards,

 

Louis

Link to post
Share on other sites

On private property

Wheel clamping on private land is treated differently. The Courts in England and Wales have accepted that it is lawful for a landowner to clamp any one who is parked on his land without his authority. However the landowner must have displayed a clear notice of the fact that cars parked without authorization will be clamped.

The courts consider that anyone who parks the car on private land in spite of having seen the notice has consented to their car being clamped. The owner of the vehicle is not allowed to cause criminal damage to the clamp by trying to remove it. The release fee must be reasonable, easily payable and result in prompt release. In Scotland clamping on private land is unlawful because it is seen as extortion.

 

The release fee must be reasonable,
No charge for release is certainly reasonable.

Private clampers must be licenced, but they are clamping for profit on behalf of a third party.

Exactly what the position would be regarding licensing, in tis case, I don't know. The caretaker is an employee of the owner of the carpark. provided there are adequate signs regarding clamping, I would have thought that it was legal.

Like someone parking a car on your own drive and you clamping it.

 

That is my opinion. I don't pretend to have a definitive answer but no doubt, somebody wii be able to supply that, shortly.

 

Regards, Rooster.

If this has been useful to you, please click on the scales at bottom left of post. Thanks.

 

Advice & opinions of Rooster-UK are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Please use your own judgment.

-------------------------------------------------------

LOOK! Free CAG Toolbar.

Follow link for more information.

 

------------------------------------------------------

Please donate,

Help us to help others.

 

 

LINKS....

 

Forum Rules.

FAQs....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your swift reply - I certainly think its a tricky one because presumably whether they are acting for profit or otherwise they would still need to be licensed to do the clamping - presumably if I were to clamp someone parking on my driveway taht would still be classed as an act of tresspass on my vehicle even if I didnt ask for a fee for its removal?

 

Thanks again,

 

Louis

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think an SIA licence is required if there is no release fee. However there still must be signs warning of the clamping and the vehicle must be released promptly. Whether 1 hour is promptly is dubious if it would be practical to release it sooner.

Post by me are intended as a discussion of the issues involved, as these are of general interest to me and others on the forum. Although it is hoped such discussion will be of use to readers, before exposing yourself to risk of loss you should not rely on any principles discussed without confirming the situation with a qualified person.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I got clamped on private land (car park) behind a pub, and got clamped by the owners.

It wasnt very well lit and no clear signs were to be seen.

the day before I seen a programe of watchdog about rogue clampers and I assumed the same happened to me.

Since I had the tools in the back of the car i removed the clamps myself.

 

The owners dragged me to court and the case got thrown out because there were no signs + the court told me that they never got my permission to clamp me. (didnt know that existed) unless its stated that they will clamp.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there,

 

I'm a 17 year old who go's to college in central Brighton - there is a staff car park which staff display a permit to use. Could anyone comment on the legality of this matter? (If you could it would help a cash strapped student who would otherwise have to pay £6 a day to park in a parking bay opposite the college..!)

 

Regards,

 

Louis

 

 

I'm sure clamping aside the College will take a dim view of you parking there everyday and you could get thrown out of college for not obeying College regulations. Is the wording 'staff car park' not clear enough to put across the point that it is NOT for students?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Told you... If you'd have asked how we knew that we could have shown you the email from the SIA who regulate this sort of thing telling us what we could and couldn't do without a full clamping license. Also, for future reference, you may have more success being polite and humble about trying to get released from a clamping as opposed to coming mob handed and telling us the error of our ways! :)

 

Thanks Green and Mean for being the only person here who seemed to give a sensible answer... There is signage on the outside fence, the gates and a wall within sight of the entire car park, as well as being in the student contract that they sign on coming to this college.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, for future reference, you may have more success being polite and humble about trying to get released from a clamping as opposed to coming mob handed and telling us the error of our ways!

 

You are required to release the vehicle promptly free of charge. Their politeness or humbleness is irrelevant.

Post by me are intended as a discussion of the issues involved, as these are of general interest to me and others on the forum. Although it is hoped such discussion will be of use to readers, before exposing yourself to risk of loss you should not rely on any principles discussed without confirming the situation with a qualified person.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Arthur v Anker

 

Nor might the clamper justify detention of the car after the owner had indicated willingness to comply with the condition for release: the clamper could not justify any delay in releasing the car after the owner offered to pay, and there had to be means for the owner to communicate his offer

 

In this case, the the condition for release must legally be nothing.

Post by me are intended as a discussion of the issues involved, as these are of general interest to me and others on the forum. Although it is hoped such discussion will be of use to readers, before exposing yourself to risk of loss you should not rely on any principles discussed without confirming the situation with a qualified person.

Link to post
Share on other sites

And as an informational aside, clamping (whether private or public) is illegal in Scotland. It was the result of a High Court case that found clamping 'deprived the owner of his full enjoyment' of the vehicle. The risk to the clampers of being made to pay high compensation for such a deprivation brought things to an abrupt halt. (They now use the contractual equivalent and buy the Registered Keeper data from the DVLA to pursue the driver.

Link to post
Share on other sites

And as an informational aside, clamping (whether private or public) is illegal in Scotland. It was the result of a High Court case that found clamping 'deprived the owner of his full enjoyment' of the vehicle. The risk to the clampers of being made to pay high compensation for such a deprivation brought things to an abrupt halt. (They now use the contractual equivalent and buy the Registered Keeper data from the DVLA to pursue the driver.

And what do they do if they get a don't know/won't tell who the driver was response from the keeper?

********************************************

Nothing in this post constitutes "advice" which I may not, in any event, be qualified to provide.

The only interpretation permitted on this post (or any others I may have made) is that this is what I would personally consider doing in the circumstances discussed. Each and every reader of this post or any other I may have made must take responsibility for forming their own view and making their own decision.

I receive an unwieldy number of private messages. I am happy to respond to messages posted on open forum but am unable to respond to private messages, seeking advice, when the substance of that message should properly be on the open forum.

Many thanks for your assistance and understanding on this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...