Jump to content

hayho1

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Posts

    66
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

1 Neutral

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. I’ve been here before with private car parks so be sure to ensure the Reg is correct but it is possible, although I question it being wrong twice. I’ll be in the vicinity tomorrow so will go and take pics of all signage thank you
  2. Many thanks for advice and apologies for delay - have been away on business. Please find attached second sheet as requested. (merged to pcn in post 1 - dx) Please answer the following questions. 1 Date of the infringement 30/09/2021 2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 05/10/2021 3 Date received 07/10/2021 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] YES 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? YES 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] NO Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up N/A 7 Who is the parking company? Car Parking Partnership (CPP) 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Shepherd Street, Liverpool. For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. British Parking Association (BPA) If you have received any other correspondence, please mention it here: Parking Charge Notice Reminder received today (19/10/2021) dated 14/10/2021
  3. I parked at Shepherd Street Car Park in Liverpool (Thursday 30/09/21). I used the automated machine to enter my registration as required and followed instructions for card payment (no error/fault message re: payment being declined). Car park did not require a ticket to be displayed in car and therefore did not provide any ticket/receipt. I returned to the automated machine before the time was due to run out and paid for an additional stay. The process this time was the same as above. I received the Parking Charge Notice on 07/10/21 (attached). Upon checking my bank I could see a payment had not been taken. I have since checked my bank (12/10/21) and there has been two payments (£3.50) taken on the same day (Friday 01/10/21) with the reference: Bexfield Properties, Liverpool. I have not made contact with the company to make any type of appeal. Would appreciate any advice on proceeding. Many thanks. H CCP PCN.pdf
  4. Thank you all for the advice now and along the way. I May not have received costs but I have won in many ways. Rather than using my money to fill dirty pockets I have made a donation to the CAG team for the tremendous support throughout. Two people within our household have now won separately owing to this support. Thank you again
  5. After submitting my schedule of costs to the courts (and being notified that this was passed over to the SOLS), I have since received a response letter from the courts (attached). I have today returned from holiday, hence the early date on the letter. Any advice would be appreciated re: next step. Many thanks letter re costings.pdf
  6. Thanks EB. I'll amend the document and send it tracked tomorrow. I rang the courts yesterday and they confirmed the case has been discontinued.
  7. thanks for clarifying. And of course I'd more than happy to donate for the fantastic support of the CAG team throughout this process.
  8. I still haven't heard from the courts so will follow up with a call tomorrow. In the meantime, I have produced my costings letter (attached). Any feedback would be appreciated prior to sending. COSTINGS.pdf
  9. apologies for this. For my reference, please could you confirm what details were showing? I tripled checked and more and cannot see where I have missed. Thank you.
  10. I received my new court date (30.05.18) after the 1st hearing was adjourned on the grounds that the Claimant claimed to have not received the defendant WS. As required, I submitted my WS to all parties 2 weeks prior to the court date. This was sent by special delivery on Tuesday and received/signed by SOLS wednesday. Today I have received an email from the SOLS (from yet another email address which has now been blocked). This states that the Claimant has issued the court with a notice of discontinuance and this matter is now concluded! I will not be trusting the email and will be ringing the court myself for clarification. I have attached the notice which looks suspect to me and has not yet been authorised by the court/judge! Any advice regarding next move would be much appreciated. I already have my schedule of costs produced which I will rely upon in court if we get there letter of discontinuance.pdf
  11. Thanks for advice. I will have the new bundle produced, including costings. I will take multiple copies with me in case.
  12. 2 emails received from SOLS to date - SOLS obtained my email following online defence submission. I will continue to return and block SOLS as advised. I will also send the WS + evidence bundle to the courts, particularly given that I am including new documents which I intend to rely on in court. To clarify, shall I send my bundle before receiving the court date - I wondered if I would be receiving a new reference number? Finally, as you will see from post #109, it seems the judge did not have the Claimant WS to hand nor has anything been submitted to the court. Yet I only learn this through speaking to someone within justice support. This is incredibly frustrating and a breach of the court conditions. Do I need to do something about this? Can you advise please
  13. And now I have been contacted: The feedback I am given is that neither party could produce evidence of what they had / not sent Re: the Claimant court bundle, this has still not been located ("could be lost/somewhere in the office") .... Defendant was informed Claimant needs to provide proof of delivery to Court and Defendant (WS was by email!) BUT MY QUESTION IS .... if the judge did not have the Claimant WS to hand, why did he allow the trial to go ahead and adjourn it on basis of both parties not being able to prove x,y, and z. When in fact it looks as though the Claimant failed to ever submit anything to the court and therefore the case should have been dismissed! Still , I only learn of this information through the caller and not the court notes!
  14. so the plot thickens.... (Approx 12:49) - I (the defendant) contacted the court to discuss my concerns re: the loss of Defendant WS Pt2 (rebuttal of Claimant WS). Defendant also explained they had submitted proof of delivery (and signage by SOLS) to rely upon in court. Defendant was transferred to a member of the filing/evidence dept. He insisted he would investigate. (Approx 12:57) - The court member returned the call. He informed the defendant that the Defendant WS (full bundle) was there, and was able to quote the full appendix range. Yet the judge did not have this on his person and suggested it had been lost???? The caller also seemed concerned / confused by the judges notes from the hearing. These appeared to indicate that it was in fact the defendant claiming they had not received the other parties WS, and could not defend themselves against this. The caller was therefore confused why the defendant was calling to submit proof of delivery of WS to Claiamant!!! DOES THE DEFENDANT HAVE THE RIGHT TO REQUEST COPIES OF COURT DOCUMENTS? Then the caller officially LET THE CAT OUT OF THE BAG..... apparently all of the Defendant's documents had been received and were on file but there was NOTHING RECEIVED BY THE COURT FROM THE CLAIMANT!!!! After airing extreme concerns and frustration re: all of the inconsistencies, the caller again sounded concerned and suggested he needs to speak to the judge AGAIN. I'm still waiting .....
  15. today was the court hearing... . The case was adjourned on the basis that the Claimant alleged they had not received the defendant WS! The claimant arrived with no papers and only an IPAD to rely upon. The Judge seemed unimpressed and allowed a ten-minute break for the Claimant to review the Defendant' copy of their own WS. The Claimant insisted this was too comprehensive, and they would be unable to defend at this time. To make matters worse, the judge didn't even have a copy of Part 2 of the Defendant' WS (Rebuttal of Claimant' WS). The judge stated this must have been lost within the court system! What a waste of time. Attempt was made by the Claimant to settle out of court - he was told we would meet again in court.
×
×
  • Create New...